Skip to content

Are Gorton's Fish Sticks Good? An Honest Review and Nutritional Breakdown

5 min read

Founded in 1849, Gorton's has been a long-standing name in frozen seafood. But for many, the real question remains: are Gorton's fish sticks good, or are they merely nostalgic breading and disappointing fish? This article offers an honest look at the brand's iconic product.

Quick Summary

A detailed look at Gorton's fish sticks, examining their flavor, fish-to-breading ratio, nutritional content, and how they stack up against rival brands.

Key Points

  • Taste Varies: While many enjoy the crispy breading and mild flavor, some find the fish content too low and the taste underwhelming.

  • Nutritional Trade-offs: Gorton's fish sticks provide protein and some Omega-3s but are a processed food with higher sodium content.

  • Superior Crispiness: The breading is a highlight, with an air fryer producing the crispiest results compared to a conventional oven.

  • Contends with Competition: Gorton's holds its own against other brands like Mrs. Paul's, often winning on crunchiness and convenience.

  • Recent Quality Concerns: Some recent customer reviews point to potential inconsistencies in product quality, citing a poor fish-to-breading ratio.

In This Article

The Flavor Profile: What Do Gorton's Fish Sticks Taste Like?

Taste is subjective, and reviews for Gorton's fish sticks reflect this. Many long-time fans praise the classic, crunchy, breaded coating and the mild flavor of the wild-caught fish inside. The signature crispy texture is often highlighted as a major selling point, especially when prepared in an air fryer. Positive reviews also note that they are a crowd-pleasing, kid-friendly meal option and are great for dipping. The taste is often described as pleasantly fishy without being overpowering, which appeals to picky eaters.

However, not all reviews are glowing. Some recent customers and taste-testers express disappointment, citing a perceived decline in quality over the years. A recurring complaint is the fish-to-breading ratio, with some feeling there is far too much breading and not enough fish. The Cheapism review, while not entirely negative, noted that Gorton's had the least flavor of the brands they tried, but was still a decent, crunchy option when dunked in tartar sauce. Ultimately, whether they are considered "good" depends on an individual's expectations for a frozen fish stick—is a nostalgic, salty, and crunchy snack enough, or is a higher fish content and more robust flavor desired?

Nutritional Breakdown and Ingredients

For a packaged frozen food, Gorton's fish sticks offer some appealing nutritional characteristics, but also some less desirable ones. The primary ingredient is wild-caught Alaskan Pollock or Cod, depending on the product, providing a solid source of protein and some Omega-3 fatty acids. According to the manufacturer, they contain no fillers, artificial colors, artificial flavors, or hydrogenated oils.

However, they are a moderately processed food. A serving of Gorton's Crunchy Breaded Fish Sticks (18 ct) contains around 190 calories, 9g of total fat, and 310mg of sodium. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has pointed out the relatively high sodium content and potential concerns with ingredients like canola oil, which can contribute small amounts of artificial trans fat due to high-temperature processing. While a convenient and quick meal, they should be enjoyed as part of a balanced diet rather than a primary fish source, as a piece of fresh salmon would contain significantly more Omega-3s.

Gorton's vs. The Competition

When placed side-by-side with other brands, Gorton's holds its own but isn't always the top choice. In a taste test by Business Insider, Gorton's was deemed the best out of three brands (Gorton's, Mrs. Paul's, and Natural Sea) for its crunch, speed of cooking, and price point. A Taste of Home test ranked Gorton's as a runner-up, praising the crispy crust achieved via oven baking.

On the other hand, a recent Seafood.media ranking placed 365 by Whole Foods Market Breaded Fish Sticks in the top spot, based on flavor, breading, and value. Some comparisons suggest that Gorton's may be less flavorful than rivals like Mrs. Paul's, but offer a superior, crunchier breading. Ultimately, the best brand depends on what a consumer values most: flavor, texture, or nutritional content.

Comparison Table: Gorton's Crunchy vs. Mrs. Paul's Crispy Battered

Feature Gorton's Crunchy Breaded Fish Sticks Mrs. Paul's Crispy Battered Fish Fillets
Fish Type Wild-caught Alaskan Pollock Pollock (varies by product)
Flavor Profile Mild, pleasant fish taste with emphasis on crispy, breadcrumb coating More prominent fish flavor noted by some testers
Texture Known for a very crispy, satisfying crunch, especially in an air fryer Can have a softer, slightly greasier texture depending on preparation
Breading Panko breadcrumbs, classic and crunchy Battered coating, good but potentially less crispy
Sodium (per serving) Moderately high Can be moderately high, depends on specific product
Price Typically mid-range and widely available Can be slightly cheaper, but may not be as good value for some

How to Get the Best Results: Cooking Methods

Proper preparation can significantly impact the quality of Gorton's fish sticks. The manufacturer recommends either a conventional oven or an air fryer for the best results, as microwaving is not advised.

  • Conventional Oven: Baking at a high temperature (425°F) for 12-14 minutes helps achieve a golden, crunchy crust. Flipping them halfway through the cooking time is recommended for even browning. Baking is a simple and reliable method.
  • Air Fryer: For maximum crispiness, many users prefer the air fryer method. It provides an extra-crispy bite without the need for added oil. The instructions typically involve placing them in the basket and cooking for a shorter duration than a conventional oven.

Pros and Cons of Gorton's Fish Sticks

Pros:

  • Convenience: Quick and easy to prepare, perfect for busy weeknights.
  • Taste and Texture: Many enjoy the crispy, crunchy breading and mild fish flavor.
  • Kid-Friendly: A popular and reliable option for children, even picky eaters.
  • Nutrient Source: Made with real, wild-caught fish (Pollock or Cod) and provides protein and Omega-3s.
  • Free From: Gorton's products are free of fillers, artificial colors, and flavors.

Cons:

  • Inconsistent Quality: Some customers report a decline in quality, particularly regarding the fish-to-breading ratio.
  • Processing: As a moderately processed food, it contains higher levels of sodium and is not as nutritionally dense as fresh fish.
  • Flavor Lacking for Some: Certain taste tests have noted a blander fish flavor compared to other brands.
  • Breading Can Be Soggy: Some customer reviews lament a lack of crispiness, even when following cooking directions.

Final Verdict: Are Gorton's Fish Sticks Good?

Ultimately, the question of whether Gorton's fish sticks are "good" depends on individual priorities and preferences. For those seeking a quick, convenient, and nostalgic meal with a satisfyingly crispy crust, Gorton's is a reliable choice that has stood the test of time. They are a great, kid-friendly option and serve as an accessible entry point to seafood.

However, for consumers who prioritize a higher fish-to-breading ratio, lower sodium content, or a more robust flavor profile, other options may be more appealing. The recent surge in negative customer reviews regarding quality issues also suggests that the classic Gorton's experience might be inconsistent. For the most up-to-date product information and ingredients, it is always best to check the manufacturer's website or the product packaging.

If you are a fan of crispy breading and a mild fish flavor, Gorton's is likely a good fit. But if you value an experience closer to fresh fish, or are more concerned about sodium levels, you might want to consider alternative brands or different preparations. They are not a nutritional powerhouse like fresh fish, but they can certainly be part of a balanced diet.

Are Gorton's fish sticks good?

Taste: Many enjoy the crunchy breading and mild flavor, while others find the fish content lacking and the taste bland. Nutrition: They provide protein and Omega-3s but are a moderately processed food with notable sodium levels. Versatility: They are a convenient and kid-friendly meal that is great for dipping and can be used in other recipes. Cooking: Best results are achieved using an oven or air fryer for maximum crispiness. Comparison: While not always a top finisher in taste tests, they are competitive with and often preferred over brands like Mrs. Paul's for their superior crispiness. Consistency: Some customer feedback suggests inconsistent quality over the years, with issues ranging from soggy breading to low fish content.

Frequently Asked Questions

Gorton's uses wild-caught Alaskan Pollock fillets in many of its fish stick products. Some premium varieties are made with wild-caught Cod.

Yes, many consumers and the manufacturer agree that an air fryer provides a crispier finish than a conventional oven, resulting in a more satisfying texture.

They are a source of protein and Omega-3s, but they are also a processed food with moderate-to-high sodium levels. They are not as healthy as fresh fish, and should be consumed in moderation.

This is a frequent complaint from some recent customers, suggesting that the ratio of breading to fish has changed over time. This feedback is subjective and may depend on the specific product batch.

In some taste tests, Gorton's is praised for its extra-crispy, breadcrumb coating, while Mrs. Paul's was noted for a more pronounced fish flavor. Gorton's often wins on crunchiness.

No, microwaving is not recommended by the manufacturer. Using an oven or air fryer will produce a much better texture and more satisfying result.

According to Gorton's, their fish sticks are made with no fillers, artificial colors, or artificial flavors. However, they are still a moderately processed food with some additives in the breading.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.