Skip to content

Are Malts Better for You Than Shakes?

4 min read

According to a nutritional comparison study, a 100g serving of malt contains 85 calories while a comparable serving of milkshake has 112 calories. This initial insight prompts a deeper look into the core ingredients and nutritional profiles to determine if malts are better for you than shakes.

Quick Summary

This article explores the nutritional differences between classic malts and shakes, examining key components like malted milk powder, sugar, and calories. It breaks down the facts to help you make an informed choice for your diet.

Key Points

  • Malt vs. Shake: The primary difference is the addition of malted milk powder, which gives malts a toasty, nutty flavor and a thicker consistency.

  • Slight Nutritional Edge: In some comparisons, malts have been found to contain less sugar and calories per 100g, along with more iron and magnesium, than milkshakes.

  • High in Sugar and Fat: Both traditional malts and shakes are high in sugar and saturated fat due to the use of ice cream and flavorings, making them indulgent treats.

  • Healthy Alternatives Exist: Homemade versions can be made healthier by using low-fat milk or milk alternatives, frozen bananas instead of ice cream, and natural sweeteners.

  • Moderation is Key: Regardless of which you choose, both malts and shakes are best enjoyed in moderation as part of a balanced diet.

In This Article

What Defines a Malt Versus a Shake?

At its core, a malted milkshake, or 'malt', is simply a regular milkshake with the key addition of malted milk powder. A standard milkshake typically consists of milk, ice cream, and flavorings like fruit or chocolate syrup. The malting process involves germinating and drying grain, usually barley, to create the distinctive powder. This powder gives malts a characteristically rich, toasty, and sometimes nutty flavor, along with a thicker consistency, compared to the smoother, creamier texture of a classic shake.

The Nutritional Differences: Malted Milk Powder's Impact

The inclusion of malted milk powder is the primary reason for any nutritional divergence. Malted barley is rich in B vitamins, antioxidants, and fiber, which may contribute certain benefits. However, it's crucial to evaluate the overall nutritional composition, including sugar and saturated fat, which often come in substantial amounts from the ice cream and syrups in both drinks. The idea that the small nutritional boost from malted milk powder significantly outweighs the high levels of fat and sugar is largely a misconception.

Calorie, Sugar, and Fat: The Real Comparison

When looking at the raw nutritional data, the differences become clearer, though the overall health profile remains similar. Based on a 100g serving size, one study found that a milkshake has higher calories, carbohydrates, and sugar content than a malt. Specifically, milkshakes reportedly have more than double the sugar content of malts in this comparison.

However, serving sizes can vary wildly, and many malts are made with the same high-calorie and high-sugar ingredients as shakes. Most health experts agree that both are indulgent treats that should be consumed sparingly, not viewed as 'healthy' options. The distinction often comes down to the amount of added sugar, which depends on the specific recipe and portion size. While the malt's inherent ingredients might offer a minor nutritional edge in some minerals like iron and zinc, the overall high content of saturated fat and sugar in both beverages should be the primary consideration.

Comparison of Key Nutritional Metrics (per 100g)

Nutrient Milkshake Malt Difference Source
Calories 112 kcal 85 kcal -27 kcal (Lower in Malt)
Carbohydrates 17.75 g 11.2 g -6.55 g (Lower in Malt)
Sugar 17.75 g 6.68 g -11.07 g (Lower in Malt)
Protein 3.86 g 3.37 g -0.49 g (Slightly Lower in Malt)
Saturated Fat 1.886 g 1.883 g -0.003 g (Comparable)
Calcium 146 mg 98 mg -48 mg (Lower in Malt)
Iron 0.1 mg 0.21 mg +0.11 mg (Higher in Malt)
Magnesium 12 mg 15 mg +3 mg (Higher in Malt)
Vitamin D 48 IU 0 IU -48 IU (Lower in Malt)

Are There Healthier Alternatives?

Given that both malts and traditional shakes are high in sugar and fat, moderation is key. However, for those who crave a healthier option, there are several ways to enjoy a similar treat without the guilt. Homemade versions offer the most control over ingredients. Using alternatives like low-fat or plant-based milk, swapping ice cream for frozen bananas or Greek yogurt, and controlling added sugars are all effective strategies. For example, a high-protein, low-calorie anabolic malt can be made using ingredients like unsweetened almond milk, protein powder, Greek yogurt, and natural cocoa powder.

Ways to Create Healthier Versions

  • Modify the Base: Use skim milk, low-fat yogurt, or milk alternatives like almond or coconut milk.
  • Replace the Ice Cream: Frozen bananas provide creaminess and natural sweetness, while frozen berries or mango can add flavor.
  • Control Sweeteners: Opt for natural sweeteners like dates, a little honey, or even a small amount of carob powder to capture a malty flavor without added sugar.
  • Boost Nutrients: Add a scoop of protein powder, a spoonful of nut butter for healthy fats, or flax seeds for fiber.
  • Rethink the Toppings: Replace whipped cream and syrup with fresh fruit, a sprinkle of cocoa powder, or a few chopped nuts.

The Final Verdict

Ultimately, the question of whether malts are better for you than shakes isn't a simple yes or no. The core nutritional profile of both is very similar when made in a traditional style, with the main variations depending on the specific recipe and portion size. While a classic malt may contain slightly less sugar and offer a few more minerals due to the malted milk powder, these differences are not significant enough to classify one as a "healthy" choice over the other. The key is mindful consumption and moderation, or for a truly healthy alternative, preparing a homemade version with controlled ingredients. For more information on nutritional guidelines, you can visit the American Heart Association.

Conclusion

While a malt might contain slightly more minerals like iron and zinc due to the malted barley, and potentially less sugar than some milkshakes, the difference is not substantial enough to categorize it as a healthy beverage. The high content of saturated fat, sugar, and calories from the ice cream in both treats means they should be enjoyed as an occasional indulgence. For those aiming for healthier options, modifying the recipe with alternative ingredients is the best approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is that a malt contains malted milk powder, while a shake does not. This powder, made from malted barley, wheat flour, and evaporated milk solids, gives the malt its characteristic nutty flavor and thicker texture.

Not always. A study indicated that a 100g serving of malt has fewer calories (85 kcal) than a milkshake (112 kcal). However, calorie counts can vary significantly based on recipe and portion size, so this is not a universal rule.

The addition of malted milk powder provides some extra vitamins and minerals like iron, magnesium, and B vitamins. However, the overall health impact is minimal compared to the high levels of sugar and saturated fat from the ice cream and syrups in both beverages.

Based on one comparison, a traditional milkshake has significantly more sugar than a malt. A 100g serving of milkshake had 17.75g of sugar, while a malt had 6.68g. This is heavily dependent on the recipe and added syrups.

Yes, you can make a healthier version at home by controlling the ingredients. Use alternatives like frozen bananas or Greek yogurt instead of ice cream, plant-based milk, and control the added sugar.

Both malts and shakes contain milk and ice cream, which provide calcium for strong bones and teeth. However, the high sugar content can have negative effects on overall health if consumed excessively.

You can try blending frozen fruit with low-fat yogurt or plant-based milk. For a malty flavor, use a smaller amount of malted milk powder or a natural alternative like carob powder with a touch of vanilla.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.