Skip to content

Understanding the Difference Between Biological Value and Digestibility Coefficient

5 min read

While protein quality is often discussed, less than a quarter of people understand the specific metrics used to evaluate it. Two key measurements, biological value and digestibility coefficient, are frequently confused, but they assess distinctly different stages of protein utilization.

Quick Summary

Digestibility coefficient measures how much dietary protein is absorbed by the body, whereas biological value assesses the efficiency of the absorbed protein's utilization for tissue synthesis. Both are crucial for determining a protein's overall nutritional quality.

Key Points

  • Digestibility Coefficient: Measures the percentage of dietary protein absorbed from the digestive tract into the body.

  • Biological Value: Measures the percentage of absorbed protein that is actually retained and utilized by the body for growth and repair.

  • Key Difference: DC focuses on absorption efficiency (getting protein into the body), while BV focuses on utilization efficiency (what the body does with the protein).

  • Overall Quality: A protein's overall nutritional quality is a function of both its digestibility and its biological value, as captured by metrics like Net Protein Utilization (NPU = BV × DC).

  • Factors: Factors like food processing and fiber content primarily affect digestibility, whereas a protein's essential amino acid profile is the main determinant of its biological value.

In This Article

What is a Protein's Digestibility Coefficient?

The digestibility coefficient (DC) focuses on the initial stage of protein utilization: digestion and absorption. It quantifies the proportion of a dietary protein that is broken down and absorbed by the body rather than being excreted as waste. A high digestibility coefficient indicates that a significant amount of the protein consumed is successfully processed and made available to the body.

How is Digestibility Coefficient Determined?

The determination of the digestibility coefficient typically involves measuring the nitrogen intake from a specific diet and comparing it to the amount of nitrogen excreted in the feces. The calculation follows this basic principle:

  • An animal is fed a test protein diet.
  • The nitrogen content of the intake is measured.
  • The nitrogen content of the feces is measured.
  • The amount of non-ingested nitrogen in the feces is corrected for. This can come from sources like endogenous enzymes and mucosal cells.

Calculation: $DC = \frac{(Nitrogen\, intake - Fecal\, nitrogen)}{Nitrogen\, intake} \times 100$

Factors Affecting Digestibility Coefficient

Several factors can influence a protein's digestibility coefficient, including:

  • Protein Source and Structure: Animal proteins, like those from dairy or meat, are generally more digestible than plant-based proteins, which have more complex structures and cellular matrices.
  • Processing and Preparation: Methods like heating, fermentation, and milling can break down protein structures and anti-nutritional factors, thereby improving digestibility. For example, cooked soybeans are more digestible than raw ones.
  • Anti-nutritional Factors: Some plant proteins contain compounds, such as trypsin inhibitors or lectins, that can interfere with the activity of digestive enzymes, lowering digestibility.
  • Fiber Content: A high fiber content can increase the rate at which food passes through the digestive tract, reducing the time for complete digestion and absorption.

What is Biological Value?

Biological value (BV) assesses the second stage of protein utilization: how efficiently the absorbed protein is used for tissue repair and growth once it enters the body. It measures the percentage of absorbed nitrogen that is retained by the body and incorporated into its own proteins. BV is a measure of the protein's overall usability and its essential amino acid profile. A protein with a high BV is considered more nutritionally complete because it provides all the essential amino acids in a proportion that closely matches the body's needs.

How is Biological Value Determined?

BV is traditionally measured by calculating the proportion of retained nitrogen to absorbed nitrogen, often through nitrogen balance studies. A protein-free diet is used to establish baseline nitrogen excretion, and a test diet is used to measure absorption and retention.

Calculation: $BV = \frac{(Nitrogen\, retained)}{Nitrogen\, absorbed} \times 100$

Where: Nitrogen retained = (Nitrogen Intake - Fecal Nitrogen) - Urinary Nitrogen Nitrogen absorbed = Nitrogen Intake - Fecal Nitrogen

Factors Affecting Biological Value

  • Amino Acid Profile: The composition and balance of essential amino acids are the most significant factor. A protein lacking one or more essential amino acids will have a lower BV, regardless of its digestibility.
  • Physiological State: The body's need for protein, which varies with age, health status, and physical activity level, can affect BV. A growing individual or an athlete may utilize protein more efficiently than a sedentary person.
  • Dietary Context: Consuming a high-protein diet can lead to a reduced BV for all protein sources, as the body's rate of protein synthesis may be the limiting factor, not the supply of amino acids.

Comparison: Biological Value vs. Digestibility Coefficient

The fundamental distinction lies in what each metric measures: one looks at the entry of protein into the body, while the other looks at its retention within the body. The comparison below provides a clearer overview.

Feature Digestibility Coefficient (DC) Biological Value (BV)
Measurement Focus Measures how much of the protein is actually absorbed. Measures how efficiently the absorbed protein is utilized.
Stage of Utilization Assesses the initial digestion and absorption stage. Assesses the post-absorption stage of utilization for body functions.
Key Factors Affected by protein source, anti-nutritional factors, processing, and fiber content. Primarily influenced by the protein's essential amino acid profile and physiological needs.
Calculated From Nitrogen intake and fecal nitrogen excretion. Nitrogen absorbed and nitrogen retained (absorbed nitrogen minus urinary nitrogen).
Inclusivity Does not account for urinary nitrogen loss or retention efficiency. Does not account for indigestible protein lost in feces.
Relationship A high DC means more protein is available for the body. A high BV means the protein is of high quality and usable by the body.
Example Raw soybeans have a low DC due to anti-nutritional factors. Casein protein has a lower BV than whey because its slower absorption impacts nitrogen retention.

How Do They Relate?

The two metrics are not mutually exclusive but rather represent different parts of the same overall story of protein quality. They are combined in other, more modern evaluations of protein quality, such as Net Protein Utilization (NPU).

The relationship is often summarized by the formula: $NPU = BV imes DC$

This equation demonstrates that a protein's overall nutritive value is a product of both its digestibility and its biological value. A protein could have a high BV, but if its DC is low (e.g., from a raw, unprocessed source), its net utilization will be poor. Conversely, a protein might be highly digestible but have a low BV if it lacks essential amino acids.

The Role of Each in Nutritional Evaluation

For a comprehensive assessment of a protein source, both the digestibility coefficient and biological value must be considered. For example, soy protein concentrate has a high BV but its anti-nutritional factors can lower its digestibility, affecting its overall utility. Comparing this to whey protein, which is both highly digestible and has a high BV, reveals why whey is often favored in sports nutrition contexts requiring rapid, efficient protein delivery.

Understanding these distinct concepts allows for a more nuanced approach to nutrition. For instance, individuals on plant-based diets can combine different protein sources to compensate for limiting amino acids and poor digestibility, ensuring a high overall net protein utilization. Processing techniques like fermentation can also improve the digestibility of plant proteins, further enhancing their nutritional quality.

Conclusion

The difference between biological value and digestibility coefficient is that the former measures the internal utilization efficiency of absorbed protein, while the latter measures the external efficiency of a protein's absorption from the digestive tract. You can think of DC as the gatekeeper, determining how much protein gets inside the body. BV is the architect, measuring how well the building blocks that made it past the gate can be used to construct and repair tissue. Evaluating both is necessary for a complete understanding of a protein's overall quality and its potential health benefits. The concepts underpin more modern protein quality scores, and they remain fundamental principles in nutritional science.

For further reading on protein assessment methods, consult this Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) report: Methods of Estimating Protein Quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary factor affecting a protein's biological value is its essential amino acid composition and balance. A complete protein that contains all essential amino acids in the right proportions will have a high BV, while one that is deficient in a key amino acid will have a lower BV.

Cooking and other processing methods primarily affect the digestibility coefficient by breaking down protein structures and inactivating anti-nutritional factors, making them easier to absorb. While cooking can potentially damage some amino acids, a protein's fundamental biological value is more dependent on its inherent amino acid profile.

Neither metric alone is a complete indicator. The most accurate assessment of a protein's nutritional quality requires considering both its digestibility coefficient and its biological value together, as they measure different aspects of the protein's journey from food to body tissue.

This can happen if their essential amino acid profiles differ significantly. One protein might be easily digested, but if it lacks a sufficient amount of a particular essential amino acid, its biological value will be lower because the body cannot efficiently use it for protein synthesis.

In modern nutrition, these concepts are often integrated into more advanced scoring systems like the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS). These newer methods provide an even more accurate measure of protein quality based on both digestibility and the amino acid profile.

Yes. A good example is gelatin, which is highly digestible but has a low biological value because it lacks certain essential amino acids. The body absorbs it well, but it cannot be efficiently utilized for building new tissue.

Combining different plant proteins allows them to complement each other's amino acid profiles. For example, pairing grains (low in lysine) with legumes (low in methionine) can create a complete protein source, effectively increasing the overall biological value of the meal.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.