Skip to content

Does Eel or Tuna Have More Protein? A Nutritional Showdown

4 min read

Gram for gram, fresh tuna generally contains more protein than eel, with some varieties offering around 30 grams per 100-gram serving compared to eel's approximately 18-24 grams. However, this simple answer doesn't tell the whole nutritional story, as both fish provide unique benefits that cater to different dietary needs. A deeper look at their fat content, vitamins, and minerals reveals a more complex picture than just a protein comparison, making it important to consider all aspects before deciding which to include in your meal plan.

Quick Summary

This article compares the protein content and overall nutritional profile of eel and tuna. It analyzes macronutrients, fat types, vitamins, minerals, and potential health considerations for both seafood options, helping you make an informed dietary choice.

Key Points

  • Tuna Has More Protein: Fresh tuna provides more protein per 100-gram serving compared to eel.

  • Eel is Fattier: Eel has a higher fat content, with beneficial omega-3s, while tuna is leaner.

  • Tuna for Low-Fat Diets: If you're focusing on a high-protein, low-fat intake, tuna is the better option.

  • Eel for Healthy Fats: For a boost in heart-healthy monounsaturated and omega-3 fatty acids, eel is an excellent choice.

  • Vitamins and Minerals: Both fish provide essential vitamins and minerals, though their profiles differ, with tuna offering more B12 and eel providing more vitamin A.

  • Mercury Concerns: Larger tuna species can contain higher mercury levels; smaller species and eel are typically lower.

  • Variety is Best: Including both eel and tuna in moderation offers a diverse range of nutrients for a balanced diet.

  • Preparation Matters: How each fish is cooked affects its nutritional values, with water-packed tuna being leaner and grilled eel retaining its natural oils.

In This Article

Eel vs. Tuna: A Detailed Nutritional Comparison

While the search for a high-protein food often leads to lean fish, the choice between eel and tuna involves more than just a single macronutrient. Both are excellent protein sources, but they differ significantly in fat content, vitamin profiles, and overall nutritional benefits. Understanding these distinctions is key to making the best choice for your health goals, whether you're building muscle, managing weight, or boosting your intake of healthy fats.

The Protein Verdict: Tuna Takes the Lead

In a head-to-head comparison, most types of tuna outmatch eel in terms of raw protein per 100-gram serving. Fresh tuna, such as yellowfin, can contain upwards of 30 grams of protein, while canned tuna is also a formidable contender, with around 25 grams. Eel, while still a great protein source, typically falls in the range of 18 to 24 grams per 100 grams, depending on the species and preparation. However, the story doesn't end there; their fat content is a critical differentiating factor that impacts total calories and other health benefits.

Fat Content and Omega-3 Profile

One of the most notable differences between eel and tuna is their fat content. Eel is a fattier fish, which contributes to its rich, distinctive flavor. This fat, however, is predominantly monounsaturated and rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which are beneficial for heart and brain health. Tuna, particularly water-packed canned tuna, is much leaner, making it a lower-calorie, lower-fat option. While fresh tuna contains omega-3s, some canned tuna varieties may have lower levels, especially if packed in water. For those prioritizing a lower-fat, higher-protein ratio, tuna is the clear winner. For those seeking a higher dose of healthy fats, particularly omega-3s, eel offers a significant advantage.

A Comparative Look at Vitamins and Minerals

Beyond protein and fat, both fish provide a robust array of essential vitamins and minerals. The nutritional content can vary based on preparation and species, but here is a general overview:

  • Vitamin A: Eel is an exceptional source of vitamin A, which supports vision and immune function.
  • Vitamin D: Both are good sources of Vitamin D, which is crucial for bone health and immune regulation.
  • B Vitamins: Tuna is particularly rich in B vitamins, including B12, which is vital for nerve function and red blood cell production. Eel also contains B vitamins, including B12.
  • Minerals: Both contain important minerals like selenium, phosphorus, and potassium. Eel also provides a good amount of calcium.

The Health and Diet Context

Your dietary needs and health goals should guide your choice. For instance, athletes and bodybuilders focused on maximum protein intake with minimal fat might lean towards tuna, especially the leaner canned varieties. Individuals looking to boost their intake of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids, perhaps for cardiovascular or cognitive health, might prefer eel. It's also important to consider the potential for mercury contamination, which is a concern with larger predatory fish like tuna. Health recommendations often suggest limiting tuna intake, particularly for certain populations like pregnant women, while smaller fish like skipjack (often used in canned light tuna) have lower mercury levels.

Eel vs. Tuna Comparison Table (per 100g)

Nutrient Fresh Tuna (Yellowfin) Eel (Mixed Species, Cooked)
Protein ~24-30g ~18-24g
Fat <1g (raw) ~15g
Calories ~109 kcal (raw) ~236 kcal (cooked)
Omega-3s High in fresh, lower in some canned Very high
Vitamin A Present, but less than eel Abundant
Vitamin B12 High Good source
Vitamin D Good source Good source
Selenium Good source Present
Iron Present Present
Mercury Higher levels in larger fish Lower due to smaller size

How to Incorporate Both Into a Healthy Diet

There's no need to pick just one. Both eel and tuna offer distinct advantages and can be part of a healthy, varied diet. Use canned tuna as a convenient, lean protein for salads and sandwiches, and enjoy fresh tuna steaks seared or grilled. Reserve eel for special meals where its rich, flavorful fat and high omega-3 content are the stars, like in sushi or unagi dishes. The key is moderation and variety, ensuring you reap the benefits of both while being mindful of factors like mercury content in larger tuna species.

Conclusion

While tuna typically packs a slightly higher protein punch per gram, eel is an undeniably nutrient-dense food, especially for those seeking healthy omega-3 fatty acids and other vitamins. The best choice ultimately depends on individual dietary needs and health goals. For a high-protein, low-fat option, tuna is the winner. For a more balanced nutrient profile rich in healthy fats, vitamins A and D, and minerals, eel is a fantastic contender. Integrating both into your diet can provide a wide range of nutrients, supporting a healthier and more varied eating plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, eel is generally a better source of omega-3 fatty acids, as it is a fattier fish overall. Some fresh tuna varieties also contain good amounts of omega-3s, but for a consistently high source, eel often has the edge.

Tuna, especially canned tuna packed in water, is typically a better choice for weight loss. It has a higher protein-to-calorie ratio and is much lower in fat, helping you feel full longer without adding excess calories.

Yes, there is a significant difference. Tuna, being a larger predatory fish, can accumulate higher levels of mercury. Smaller, canned tuna varieties like skipjack have lower mercury, while eel, being smaller, generally has lower levels than larger tuna.

Fresh tuna can sometimes contain more protein per gram than canned tuna, though they are often very similar. Canned tuna, however, remains a very convenient and cost-effective source of high-quality protein.

Both fish are nutrient-dense. Eel is especially rich in Vitamin A and healthy fats, while tuna is an excellent source of B vitamins, particularly B12. Your best bet is to include both in your diet for a broader range of nutrients.

No, eel should always be cooked before consumption. Raw eel contains a toxin in its blood that is destroyed by cooking. Never eat raw eel.

The fat in eel is high in beneficial monounsaturated fatty acids and omega-3s, similar to salmon or mackerel. This makes it a great choice for heart health, though its overall fat and calorie content are higher than very lean fish.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.