Skip to content

Exploring: What is the safest and most common alternative of sugar?

5 min read

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), average American adults consume an excessive amount of added sugar daily, far exceeding recommended limits. This has led many to question, what is the safest and most common alternative of sugar? This guide delves into the most popular low-calorie and zero-calorie sweeteners, focusing on safety and common usage to help you make an informed choice for your health.

Quick Summary

This nutritional guide compares popular sugar substitutes, including Stevia, monk fruit, and erythritol. It details their origins, safety profiles, taste characteristics, and ideal uses to help readers select a sugar alternative that fits their dietary needs and preferences.

Key Points

  • Purified Stevia Extract: Derived from the stevia plant, it is a zero-calorie, zero-carb sweetener with a strong safety record and is considered GRAS by the FDA.

  • Monk Fruit Extract: Sourced from the monk fruit, this zero-calorie sweetener is intensely sweet, does not affect blood sugar, and is also FDA-approved as GRAS.

  • Erythritol: A sugar alcohol used for its low-calorie, sugar-like taste and bulking properties, but recent studies have raised potential cardiovascular health concerns, suggesting cautious use for some individuals.

  • Not all 'Natural' is Equal: 'Natural' sweeteners like honey, maple syrup, and agave are still sugars with calories that impact blood sugar and should be used in moderation.

  • Mindful Consumption is Key: The healthiest approach is to reduce your reliance on sweet flavors overall by consuming more whole foods and retraining your palate.

  • Consider Your Needs: The best sweetener depends on your health goals, taste preference, and intended use, such as baking, which may require specific properties.

In This Article

Why Search for Sugar Alternatives?

Excessive consumption of added sugars is a known contributor to several major health issues, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and dental cavities. For many people, reducing sugar intake is a crucial step toward better health. This has led to a booming market for sugar substitutes, which offer sweetness without the associated calories and blood sugar spikes. These alternatives fall into a few main categories: naturally derived sweeteners, sugar alcohols, and artificial sweeteners. While each category has its place, some options are widely considered safer and more common than others.

The Contenders: Safest and Most Common Sugar Replacements

Choosing the 'best' alternative depends on individual health goals, taste preferences, and how the sweetener will be used. However, among the most popular and FDA-approved options, purified Stevia extract and monk fruit extract stand out due to their natural origins and strong safety records.

Stevia: The Plant-Derived Sweetener

Derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, purified stevia leaf extract is a zero-calorie, zero-carbohydrate sweetener that is 200–400 times sweeter than table sugar.

  • Benefits: Studies show that pure stevia extracts do not affect blood sugar or insulin levels, making them safe for people with diabetes. The FDA has granted high-purity steviol glycosides (the sweet compounds in stevia) GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status. Unlike other alternatives, purified stevia has a long-standing history of use and research supporting its safety.
  • Drawbacks: Some people report a slightly bitter or licorice-like aftertaste, especially with certain blends. Crude stevia extracts and whole leaves are not FDA-approved due to a lack of research. Many commercial stevia products are blended with other sweeteners or fillers, so it is important to read labels.

Monk Fruit: A Natural, No-Calorie Option

Monk fruit, or luo han guo, is a small melon native to southern China. Its intense sweetness comes from compounds called mogrosides, which contain no calories and do not impact blood sugar.

  • Benefits: Like stevia, monk fruit extract is zero-calorie and has a negligible effect on blood glucose, making it ideal for diabetics and those on low-carb diets. The FDA has also deemed monk fruit extract GRAS. Some research suggests mogrosides have antioxidant properties.
  • Drawbacks: It is a relatively newer entrant to the commercial market, so long-term human studies are more limited than with stevia. Some users report a slight aftertaste, and its high potency requires using very small amounts, which can affect the bulk and texture of baked goods.

Erythritol: The Most Popular Sugar Alcohol

Erythritol is a sugar alcohol found naturally in some fruits and fermented foods. It is commercially produced by fermenting glucose and is about 70% as sweet as sugar with very few calories.

  • Benefits: It has a clean, sugar-like taste and does not raise blood sugar levels. It is also tooth-friendly, as oral bacteria cannot metabolize it. It is often used to provide bulk in low-calorie and keto-friendly products.
  • Drawbacks: Recent studies, particularly from Cleveland Clinic researchers, have raised concerns about a potential link between high blood levels of erythritol and an increased risk of cardiovascular events like heart attack and stroke. While more research is needed, this has prompted many to favor other alternatives, especially for regular, long-term consumption. High doses can also cause digestive issues like bloating, gas, and diarrhea.

A Comparison of Sugar Alternatives

To better understand the differences, this table compares purified stevia, monk fruit, and erythritol based on key factors:

Feature Purified Stevia Extract Monk Fruit Extract Erythritol
Sweetness 200–400x sweeter than sugar 150–250x sweeter than sugar 60–70% as sweet as sugar
Calories Zero Zero 0.24 kcal/g (very low)
Glycemic Index 0 0 0
Common Use Drinks, baking (often blended) Drinks, baking (often blended) Baking, low-calorie products, bulking agent
Taste Sweet, with potential aftertaste Sweet, with potential aftertaste Clean, sugar-like taste
Safety Profile Strong, supported by decades of research Generally safe, but newer to market Recent studies link high levels to cardiovascular risk; digestive issues possible with high intake

How to Choose the Right Sugar Substitute for You

  • Prioritize Safety: Based on current research, purified stevia and monk fruit extracts are generally considered the safest options for regular, long-term consumption. The recent findings regarding erythritol may warrant caution, especially for individuals with cardiovascular risk factors.
  • Consider Application: Erythritol's sugar-like texture and bulking properties can be useful for certain baking applications, but recipe adjustments are needed when substituting high-intensity sweeteners like stevia or monk fruit. For general sweetening in drinks or cereals, pure liquid extracts or single-serving packets are convenient.
  • Listen to Your Body: Pay attention to how your body reacts. If digestive issues arise with sugar alcohols like erythritol, scale back or try an alternative.
  • Read Labels Carefully: Many products use proprietary blends of sweeteners. Always check the ingredient list to know what you are consuming, as some blends may contain other additives or fillers.

Tips for Reducing Your Reliance on Sweeteners

Ultimately, the healthiest approach is to reduce your overall preference for sweet tastes. Here are some strategies:

  • Retrain Your Palate: Gradually decrease the amount of sweetener you add to your coffee, tea, or food. Your taste buds will adapt over time, and you'll begin to appreciate less sweetness.
  • Choose Whole Foods: Use naturally sweet whole foods to satisfy cravings. Mash a banana into oatmeal, add berries to yogurt, or blend dates into smoothies.
  • Stay Hydrated with Water: Often, we reach for sugary drinks out of habit. Replace sodas and sweetened teas with plain or naturally infused water (e.g., with lemon, cucumber, or mint).
  • Explore Flavor Enhancers: Use spices like cinnamon, nutmeg, or vanilla extract to add flavor and a perceived sweetness without adding sugar or substitutes.

The Bottom Line: What is the safest and most common alternative of sugar?

When it comes to safety and common use, purified stevia extract and monk fruit extract are the leading contenders. Both are zero-calorie, have a neutral glycemic impact, and are derived from natural sources, making them a good choice for people managing blood sugar or body weight. The FDA considers both purified extracts to be generally safe. While erythritol is also common and has baking advantages, recent studies linking it to potential cardiovascular risks suggest caution for regular, long-term intake. Ultimately, the best strategy is to reduce overall sweetness dependency, but these naturally derived, low-calorie alternatives can be a helpful tool in that process.

This article provides general information and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare professional or registered dietitian for personalized guidance on diet and sugar alternatives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Natural sweeteners, like stevia and monk fruit, are derived from plants or fruits. Artificial sweeteners are synthetic chemical compounds created in a lab. While both can offer zero or low calories, their source and processing differ.

Yes, many sugar substitutes, particularly those with a glycemic index of zero like purified stevia and monk fruit extract, are considered safe for people with diabetes because they do not raise blood glucose levels.

Yes, sugar alcohols such as erythritol are not fully absorbed by the body. In large quantities, this can cause digestive issues like bloating, gas, and diarrhea in some individuals.

Yes, but be aware that different sweeteners behave differently in baking. High-intensity sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit, for example, do not provide the bulk and texture that sugar does. Recipes may need to be adjusted by adding other ingredients, while erythritol can serve as a bulking agent.

Recent studies have linked higher blood levels of erythritol with an increased risk of heart attack and stroke, especially for individuals with existing cardiovascular risk factors. More research is ongoing, but this has led to increased caution regarding regular, high-dose consumption.

Yes, the FDA has not approved whole stevia leaves or crude stevia extracts for use as food additives due to insufficient safety data. The use of cyclamates was also banned in the U.S. in 1969.

The FDA and other major health agencies have clarified that approved artificial sweeteners do not cause cancer in humans, despite past concerns raised by animal studies. The findings from those early studies were later found not to apply to humans.

Both are intensely sweet, but stevia can sometimes have a lingering, slightly bitter or licorice-like aftertaste. Monk fruit generally has a cleaner, less lingering flavor, though taste can vary by brand and blend.

Replacing high-calorie sugar with low or zero-calorie alternatives can reduce overall caloric intake, which may aid in weight management. However, some studies suggest sweeteners might alter appetite or cravings, and the WHO recommends against relying on them for long-term weight control.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.