Skip to content

How do scientists determine the nutritional value of foods?

5 min read

Over a century ago, early chemists like Carl Friedrich Mohr and Justus von Liebig pioneered methods for analyzing food composition, forming the basis of how scientists determine the nutritional value of foods today. This complex process involves a variety of laboratory techniques, data analysis, and advanced technologies to accurately quantify the nutrients within our food.

Quick Summary

This article details the scientific methodologies for determining food's nutritional worth, including laboratory proximate analysis for macronutrients, advanced instrumental techniques for vitamins and minerals, and the development of comprehensive food composition databases.

Key Points

  • Proximate Analysis: This foundational lab method provides a basic breakdown of a food's moisture, ash, protein, fat, and carbohydrate content.

  • Advanced Instrumentation: High-tech equipment like chromatographs and mass spectrometers are essential for accurately quantifying specific vitamins, minerals, and other trace compounds.

  • Bomb Calorimetry: The energy content of food is determined by burning a sample in a sealed chamber and measuring the heat released, a process called bomb calorimetry.

  • Food Composition Databases: Comprehensive databases, such as those maintained by the USDA, store and standardize nutritional data from lab analyses, which manufacturers can use for accurate labeling.

  • Bioavailability and Epidemiology: Beyond lab tests, scientists study the bioavailability of nutrients (how they're absorbed) and use large-scale population studies (epidemiology) to understand diet's impact on long-term health.

In This Article

Determining the nutritional value of foods is a multi-faceted process that combines laboratory analysis, computational methods, and human studies. From the basic breakdown of macronutrients to the measurement of trace vitamins, scientists employ an arsenal of techniques to build the data that informs nutrition labels, dietary guidelines, and public health policy.

The foundational approach: Proximate analysis

At the core of food analysis is proximate analysis, a set of tests that break food down into its basic components: moisture, ash, crude protein, crude fat, and carbohydrates. While these methods provide a fundamental understanding of a food's composition, they are often a starting point for more detailed analysis.

Measuring water content

Moisture content is a crucial factor, influencing a food's texture, shelf life, and nutrient concentration. Scientists typically measure moisture by weighing a food sample, drying it completely in an oven, and then reweighing it. The difference in weight reveals the amount of water lost.

Determining mineral content (Ash)

Ash content represents the total mineral content of a food. To measure this, a sample is incinerated at a high temperature (typically around 550°C), burning off all organic material (protein, fat, and carbohydrates) and leaving behind only the inorganic residue, or ash. This residue is then weighed, giving a basic measure of the food's total mineral load.

Quantifying crude protein

The Kjeldahl method, a long-standing technique, determines crude protein by measuring the nitrogen content of a food sample. Since protein is the primary source of nitrogen in food, the nitrogen value is multiplied by a conversion factor to estimate the total protein. This method has been refined over the years but remains a standard for many applications. More recently, the Dumas method, which involves combusting the sample, has gained popularity for its speed and accuracy.

Measuring crude fat

Crude fat content is typically measured using solvent extraction. A dried food sample is repeatedly washed with a non-polar organic solvent, such as hexane or petroleum ether, to dissolve and extract all the lipids. The solvent is then evaporated, and the remaining residue is weighed to determine the fat content.

Calculating carbohydrates by difference

Unlike the other macronutrients, carbohydrates are often not measured directly but are instead calculated by difference. This involves subtracting the percentages of moisture, ash, crude protein, and crude fat from 100% to arrive at an estimate for total carbohydrates. This calculation can be less precise than direct measurement, especially for complex foods.

Advanced instrumental analysis for specific nutrients

While proximate analysis covers the basics, determining the precise amounts of specific vitamins, minerals, and fatty acids requires more advanced technology. Analytical chemistry employs a range of sophisticated instruments to achieve this.

  • Chromatography: This technique separates different components of a mixture. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is often used to separate and quantify vitamins, such as the various forms of vitamin A and C. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) is effective for analyzing fatty acid composition and other volatile compounds.
  • Mass Spectrometry (MS): Often coupled with chromatography, mass spectrometry identifies and quantifies the separated molecules by measuring their mass-to-charge ratio. LC-MS/MS is a highly sensitive method used to measure individual folate forms or specific vitamins like D.
  • Spectrophotometry: This method measures how a substance absorbs light at different wavelengths. For instance, colorimetry can be used to measure certain minerals after they are reacted with a chemical to produce a colored compound.
  • Immunological Methods: Immunoassays, such as ELISA tests, use antibodies to detect and quantify specific proteins and certain vitamins. These can be particularly useful for fast and specific testing.
  • Bomb Calorimetry: To determine the total energy (calorie) content of food, a bomb calorimeter is used. A sample is placed inside a sealed container (the 'bomb') filled with oxygen, which is then submerged in a chamber of water. The sample is ignited, and the heat released raises the water's temperature. By measuring the temperature change, scientists can calculate the energy released during combustion.

Beyond the lab: Databases and bioavailability

Raw laboratory data is just one piece of the puzzle. To translate this into meaningful nutritional information, scientists must also account for how nutrients are absorbed and used by the body, a concept known as bioavailability.

Food Composition Databases (FCDBs): Organizations like the USDA maintain comprehensive food composition databases that compile and standardize nutritional data from thousands of lab analyses. When a new food product is created, manufacturers often use these databases to calculate the nutrient information for their labels, rather than re-testing every ingredient. This approach, however, has limitations, as the composition can vary based on growing conditions, processing, and storage.

Bioavailability Studies: The nutritional value of a nutrient isn't just about its quantity in the food; it's about how much the body can actually absorb and utilize. Bioavailability studies can involve both in vitro (lab-based) and in vivo (animal or human) methods. In vitro models simulate digestion to see how much of a nutrient is released from the food matrix, while human studies might track nutrient levels in blood or urine after a meal. For example, the iron in a high-phytate grain is less bioavailable than the iron in meat.

Nutritional Epidemiology: Large-scale population studies known as nutritional epidemiology examine the relationship between dietary patterns and health outcomes. Researchers use methods like food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 24-hour recalls to estimate nutrient intake across a large group. While this data is based on self-reported information and subject to recall bias, it's crucial for understanding the long-term effects of nutrition on public health.

Comparison of nutrient analysis methods

Method Primary Purpose Pros Cons
Proximate Analysis Basic macronutrient breakdown (protein, fat, carbohydrates) Cost-effective, standardized, and widespread Provides general estimates, not specific nutrient types
Chromatography (HPLC/GC-MS) Specific nutrient measurement (e.g., vitamins, fatty acids) High specificity and accuracy for individual compounds Complex, requires specialized equipment and expertise
Bomb Calorimetry Total energy content (calories) Direct and precise measure of heat released Does not account for human digestion efficiency (e.g., fiber)
Food Composition Databases Calculate nutrient content for food labeling Time-efficient and cost-effective Relies on average values, may not reflect specific food samples
Bioavailability Studies Assess nutrient absorption efficiency Accounts for complex food matrix and digestive factors Can be complex, expensive, and sometimes involve ethical considerations
Nutritional Epidemiology Link diet patterns to population health Tracks long-term diet-disease relationships Heavily reliant on self-reported data, susceptible to bias

Conclusion: A symphony of science

Determining the nutritional value of foods is far from a simple task. It requires a sophisticated and multi-layered scientific approach, from the basic breakdown of a food's macronutrients to the high-tech analysis of trace compounds. Scientists rely on a combination of classical laboratory techniques, advanced instrumentation, and robust food composition databases, all while considering the critical factor of bioavailability. This rigorous process provides the foundation for the dietary information that empowers consumers and informs public health strategies worldwide. As technology continues to evolve, these methods become more precise, offering an ever-clearer picture of the complex relationship between the food we eat and our health.

For more in-depth information, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Knowledge Repository offers extensive resources on food composition data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Proximate analysis is a set of standardized laboratory methods used to determine the percentages of the main components in a food sample: moisture, ash, protein, fat, and carbohydrates.

Calories are measured using a bomb calorimeter to burn a food sample and calculate the energy released. However, many food labels use the Atwater system, which calculates calories based on the macronutrient content (e.g., 4 kcal/g for carbs and protein, 9 kcal/g for fat).

Food composition varies based on factors like plant cultivar, soil, climate, processing methods, and storage. Therefore, a database often provides average values, which may not perfectly reflect the specific item you are consuming.

Bioavailability is the extent and rate at which a nutrient is absorbed from a food and becomes available for use by the body. It can be affected by the food's matrix, preparation, and an individual's physiology.

Scientists use various advanced techniques to measure vitamins, including High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and immunoassays like ELISA, which can be highly sensitive and specific.

Lab testing of a specific sample is generally more accurate for that sample. Databases are compiled from multiple tests and provide representative, standardized values, which is efficient for widespread use but less precise for a single food item.

Dietary fiber is often measured using standardized methods like those from the AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). These methods typically involve enzymatic digestion to isolate the indigestible residue, which is then weighed.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.