Skip to content

How much protein is in the grass?

3 min read

The protein content of grass varies significantly, with studies showing crude protein levels in perennial ryegrass ranging from 15% to 28% of dry matter. This variation is influenced by factors such as the grass species, its stage of maturity, and management practices. Understanding these factors is crucial for both livestock farmers and those interested in sustainable food production.

Quick Summary

The protein content of grass is highly variable, depending on factors like species, maturity, and fertilization. It's measured as crude protein (CP), but only ruminants can effectively digest it directly. Researchers are exploring extraction methods to create human-edible protein from grass.

Key Points

  • Variable Protein Content: The protein level in grass varies significantly based on factors such as species, maturity, and fertilization methods.

  • Higher in Young Plants: Young, leafy grass has a higher concentration of protein and is more digestible than mature grass.

  • Ruminant vs. Human Digestion: Humans cannot digest the fibrous cellulose in raw grass, while ruminants possess specialized digestive systems to do so efficiently.

  • Crude Protein (CP) Measure: Protein content is often reported as crude protein (CP), which is an estimate based on nitrogen levels and includes non-protein nitrogen.

  • Processing for Human Use: New technologies can extract protein concentrate from grass, creating a tasteless powder for human consumption.

  • Sustainable Alternative: Processed grass protein can offer higher digestible protein yields per hectare and significantly lower GHG emissions compared to livestock farming.

In This Article

The Grass Is Not Always Greener: Understanding Protein Variation

The protein in grass is typically reported as crude protein (CP), which is calculated based on the total nitrogen content. This calculation, multiplying nitrogen content by 6.25, includes both true protein and non-protein nitrogen (NPN). The percentage of crude protein varies widely and is influenced by several key factors:

  • Grass Species: Different grass types have different protein potentials. For instance, legumes like clover generally have higher protein content than ryegrass.
  • Stage of Maturity: This is one of the most critical factors. Young, leafy swards have the highest protein and digestibility. As the plant matures and produces seeds, the protein content decreases, and the fiber content increases.
  • Soil Fertility and Fertilization: The availability of nitrogen, along with other nutrients like sulfur, is vital for protein formation. Strategic fertilization can boost protein levels in the grass.
  • Environmental Conditions: Climate factors such as temperature, light exposure, and precipitation can affect the synthesis of organic matter and minerals, including protein.
  • Harvesting/Grazing Frequency: More frequent harvesting or grazing, particularly during the early growth stages, can help maintain a consistently higher protein level in the sward by preventing maturation.

Livestock vs. Human Digestion

For most of history, grass has been considered a food source exclusively for ruminant animals like cows and sheep due to the human digestive system's inability to break down cellulose. These animals possess specialized stomach compartments and symbiotic bacteria that efficiently ferment and extract nutrients from the fibrous material. In this process, the rumen microbes convert much of the grass's protein into microbial protein, which is then used by the animal.

In contrast, humans lack the necessary enzymes and stomach structure to digest the high fiber content of raw grass blades. Eating unprocessed grass would provide minimal nutritional benefit and could even cause digestive issues. However, modern food science has found innovative ways to overcome this limitation through processing.

Comparison of Protein Yields: Grass vs. Livestock

Recent research explores the potential of processing grass into a protein concentrate for human consumption, evaluating the nutritional, environmental, and economic trade-offs. This involves extracting and refining the protein from green biomass, typically separating it into a fibrous press cake and a protein-rich fluid. The fluid is further processed to create a tasteless, high-protein powder. The comparison below highlights potential protein yields (digestible kg per hectare) based on Irish farm-level data.

Source Processing Technology Digestible Protein Yield (kg/ha) GHG Emissions (kg CO2-eq per 100g protein) Primary Challenge
Dairy (Milk) N/A 407 2.63 High emissions
Beef (Meat) N/A 51 13.01 Low yield, very high emissions
Perennial Ryegrass Multi-stage Maceration 301–529 0.14–0.22 Scalability, cost
Ryegrass-Clover Mix Multi-stage Maceration 888 0.04 Scalability, cost

Note: Yields for grass protein concentrate depend on target yields (low vs. high) and processing efficiency.

The Future of Grass Protein for Human Consumption

The potential of grass as a direct human protein source is a compelling area of research, primarily for its environmental benefits over conventional livestock farming. A key finding is that processing a ryegrass-clover mix could yield more digestible protein per hectare than milk production, at a significantly lower carbon footprint.

Several challenges remain, particularly in scaling up the technology for cost-effective mass production and ensuring consumer acceptance of this novel ingredient. For human consumption, the protein must be extracted and refined, unlike for ruminants who can utilize the whole plant. The protein concentrate, primarily rich in the enzyme RuBisCO, is a high-quality protein source. Innovative food products, like protein bars and yogurt, are being developed to incorporate this sustainable ingredient. While processing costs and market acceptance are hurdles, the environmental and nutritional potential of grass-based protein for human food systems is clear. This could help diversify our protein sources and improve agricultural sustainability globally.

Visit ScienceDirect for a comprehensive study on grass as a potential protein source

Conclusion

The amount of protein in grass is not a fixed number but a dynamic figure influenced by species, maturity, and management. While humans cannot digest unprocessed grass, advanced processing technologies now allow for the extraction of a high-quality protein concentrate suitable for human consumption. This novel food source holds significant promise for improving agricultural efficiency and sustainability by offering high protein yields with a substantially lower environmental impact compared to livestock products like milk and beef. Continued research and scaling of these technologies will determine the future of grass as a direct contributor to the human diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, humans cannot digest unprocessed grass to get protein because our digestive systems lack the necessary enzymes to break down its high cellulose content.

Researchers use a process called wet fractionation, which involves pressing the grass to separate it into a fibrous cake and a protein-rich juice. The protein is then extracted and refined into a tasteless, high-quality powder.

The stage of maturity is a primary factor. Young, leafy grass contains a higher percentage of protein, which declines as the plant matures and becomes more fibrous.

Yes, research indicates that producing protein from grass for human food has a significantly lower environmental impact, including reduced GHG emissions, compared to animal-based protein sources.

Crude protein (CP) is an estimate based on the total nitrogen content and includes both true protein and non-protein nitrogen (NPN). True protein is the fraction that is more efficiently utilized by animals.

Yes, different species have varying protein levels. Legumes like clover, for example, typically have higher protein content than perennial ryegrass.

Key obstacles include scaling up processing technology to be cost-effective, ensuring consumer acceptance of novel ingredients, and addressing potential changes in flavor and texture in final food products.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.