Skip to content

Is 93/7 the best ground beef for your nutrition diet?

4 min read

A 4-ounce serving of 93/7 ground beef contains approximately 23-25 grams of high-quality protein, an impressive statistic for muscle repair and growth. But, is 93/7 the best ground beef for every diet and dish, or do other factors play a more significant role in nutritional choices?

Quick Summary

The ideal ground beef depends on your health goals and recipe. 93/7 offers high protein with low fat, making it excellent for specific dietary needs, but can be dry. Fattier blends provide more moisture and flavor, which may be preferable for certain dishes like burgers.

Key Points

  • Low Fat, High Protein: 93/7 ground beef is prized for its low fat content (7%) and high protein density, making it ideal for health-conscious diets.

  • Best for Sauces and Casseroles: Its leanness prevents excess grease, making it the perfect choice for dishes like chili, tacos, and pasta sauces.

  • Flavor vs. Juiciness Trade-off: Fattier blends like 80/20 are often preferred for burgers, where the rendered fat adds flavor and moisture, which 93/7 lacks.

  • Cooking Technique is Key: To prevent 93/7 from becoming dry, add moisture (broth, sauce) and use binders (breadcrumbs, eggs) for dishes like meatloaf.

  • Cost Considerations: As a leaner cut, 93/7 ground beef is typically more expensive per pound than higher-fat alternatives.

  • Packed with Nutrients: Despite being lean, 93/7 is a good source of essential minerals like iron, zinc, and a variety of B vitamins, especially B12.

In This Article

The percentages on ground beef packaging, such as 93/7, refer to the lean-to-fat ratio by weight. In the case of 93/7, this means the meat is 93% lean beef and 7% fat. This ratio makes it an “extra-lean” option, appealing to those focused on minimizing fat intake and managing weight. However, whether it's truly the "best" depends on what you're cooking and your overall dietary priorities.

The Nutritional Profile of 93/7 Ground Beef

For those watching their fat and calorie intake, 93/7 offers clear advantages. A 100-gram serving (about 3.5 ounces) of cooked 93/7 ground beef has significantly fewer calories and less saturated fat than fattier alternatives. While the fat content is lower, it remains a nutrient-dense food, providing a rich source of essential vitamins and minerals.

  • High-Quality Protein: Crucial for building and maintaining muscle mass, especially important for individuals in a calorie deficit trying to lose weight while preserving muscle.
  • Essential Minerals: Rich in iron (particularly the easily absorbed heme iron), zinc, and selenium, which support oxygen transport, immune function, and act as antioxidants.
  • B Vitamins: An excellent source of B vitamins, including B12, B3 (niacin), and B6, which are vital for nerve function, DNA synthesis, and energy metabolism.

Comparison Table: 93/7 vs. Other Common Blends

Feature 93/7 (Extra Lean) 85/15 (Lean) 80/20 (Ground Chuck)
Fat Content (by weight) 7% 15% 20%
Ideal For Sauces, chili, tacos, stuffed vegetables All-purpose, balanced flavor and moisture Juicy burgers, meatballs, rich meatloaf
Key Trait Lowest fat and calories, can be dry Versatile balance of flavor and leanness Maximum flavor and juiciness, but higher fat
Calories (per 100g) ~170 kcal ~250 kcal ~288 kcal

When is 93/7 the 'Best' Choice?

93/7 ground beef excels in specific applications and dietary contexts. Its minimal fat content means it cooks with very little grease, which is ideal for dishes where you don't want an oily residue or need to drain a significant amount of fat.

  • Weight Management: For those in a calorie deficit, choosing a leaner blend like 93/7 is an easy way to reduce overall calorie intake without sacrificing protein.
  • Sauce-Based Dishes: In recipes like spaghetti bolognese, chili, or sloppy joes, the extra liquid from sauces prevents the meat from drying out, while the lean beef absorbs the flavor without leaving excess grease.
  • High-Protein, Low-Fat Diets: Athletes or individuals on low-fat diets can maximize their protein intake per serving with 93/7.
  • Mixing with Fillers: If you're mixing ground beef with high-fiber fillers like lentils or mushrooms, the lean beef provides the protein punch while the fillers add moisture and bulk.

The Challenges of Cooking with Lean Ground Beef

While nutritionally superior in many ways, 93/7 ground beef presents a culinary challenge: moisture loss. Without a high fat content to render and keep the meat juicy, it can quickly become dry, tough, and crumbly if overcooked.

To compensate for the lack of fat, skilled cooks employ several techniques:

  • Add Moisture: Incorporate ingredients like diced vegetables (onions, mushrooms), broth, or tomato sauce during cooking.
  • Use Binders: For dishes like meatballs or meatloaf, binders such as eggs, breadcrumbs soaked in milk, or finely ground oats help retain moisture.
  • Avoid Overcooking: Cook only until the meat is no longer pink and avoid overcrowding the pan to ensure even browning rather than steaming.
  • Add a Fat Source: A small amount of a healthy fat, like olive oil, can help enhance the flavor and prevent sticking.

Beyond the Numbers: Flavor and Cost

For many, the debate over ground beef isn't just about nutrition; it's also about flavor and cost. Fat is a significant carrier of flavor, and many find fattier blends like 80/20 to have a richer, more satisfying taste profile. This is a major reason why 80/20 is the classic choice for burgers, where juiciness is paramount. The leaner 93/7, by comparison, has a less intense beef flavor and requires more aggressive seasoning to shine. Leaner ground beef options, due to the cuts of meat used, are also typically more expensive than fattier ones. For some, the flavor and cost benefits of a moderately fatty blend outweigh the caloric savings of a lean cut.

Conclusion

Ultimately, whether is 93/7 the best ground beef depends entirely on your specific nutritional goals and culinary needs. For those prioritizing lower fat and calorie counts, such as for weight management or heart health, 93/7 is an excellent and versatile choice, especially in sauces and chilis where moisture is added. However, for dishes like burgers where rich flavor and juiciness are key, a fattier blend like 80/20 will yield a more satisfying result. The key is to understand the trade-offs between leanness, flavor, and cost and to choose the right tool for the job. By knowing when to use extra-lean versus fatty ground beef, you can master both nutrition and taste in your cooking.

For more in-depth nutritional guidance on incorporating lean beef into a weight loss plan, consider exploring resources from nutritional experts like Noom: Is ground beef good for weight loss? The best type to choose.

Frequently Asked Questions

Most chefs advise against using 93/7 ground beef for traditional burgers because its low fat content can result in a dry, less flavorful patty. It's best reserved for other dishes where moisture is added.

The main difference is fat and calorie content. For the same serving size, 93/7 has significantly less fat and fewer calories, while 80/20 has more fat, calories, and a richer flavor.

To keep it moist, add ingredients like diced onions, mushrooms, or a little broth to the pan. For meatloaf and meatballs, use binders such as breadcrumbs soaked in milk and eggs.

Yes, choosing a leaner blend like 93/7 can support weight loss goals by providing a high amount of protein to promote fullness while significantly reducing overall calorie and saturated fat intake.

93/7 is ideal for recipes where excess grease is undesirable. Excellent choices include tacos, chili, stuffed peppers, and pasta sauces, where the lean meat can absorb flavors from other ingredients.

The 93/7 ratio specifies the lean-to-fat content regardless of the cow's diet. However, grass-fed beef may offer a slightly different nutrient profile, such as more omega-3s, but the fat percentage is the primary factor for leanness.

Yes, due to the cuts of beef used to achieve the low fat percentage, leaner ground beef is typically more expensive per pound than fattier options like 80/20.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.