Skip to content

Is BHT in gum bad for you?

5 min read

According to the U.S. FDA, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) has been considered "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) for use in food since 1959, but a growing number of consumers and regulators are now asking: is BHT in gum bad for you? Mounting evidence from animal studies and regulatory changes abroad are putting this preservative under renewed scrutiny.

Quick Summary

BHT is an antioxidant added to chewing gum and other foods to extend shelf life, but its safety is a subject of debate due to potential health concerns identified in some studies.

Key Points

  • Regulatory Debate: Although the FDA has historically deemed BHT as "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) for use in low concentrations, its safety is under active re-evaluation by regulatory bodies in the US and globally.

  • Conflicting Evidence: High-dose animal studies suggest potential risks like organ toxicity, endocrine disruption, and carcinogenicity, but human data is limited and conclusive evidence is lacking for low-level dietary exposure.

  • The Cocktail Effect: A key concern for health advocates is the cumulative exposure to BHT from multiple sources (including gum, other foods, and cosmetics), which may increase overall health risks.

  • Growing Alternatives: The consumer trend toward "clean labeling" has led many manufacturers to replace synthetic antioxidants like BHT with natural alternatives, such as rosemary extract or tocopherols (Vitamin E).

  • Read the Label: To avoid BHT in gum, consumers should always check the ingredient list for "BHT" or its European code, "E321," and look for products explicitly labeled as having no artificial preservatives.

  • Informed Choice: Given the ongoing debate, consumers must weigh the available information and decide for themselves if avoiding BHT is a priority for their personal health and wellness.

In This Article

What is BHT and Why is it in Chewing Gum?

BHT, or butylated hydroxytoluene, is a synthetic antioxidant widely used as a preservative in processed foods, including chewing gum. Its primary purpose is to prevent fats and oils from oxidizing, which can cause them to become rancid and spoil. In chewing gum, this helps to maintain the product's flavor, color, and freshness over time. Without BHT, the gum base and flavorings would degrade much more quickly, limiting shelf life and product quality.

The substance has been part of the food supply for decades. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted BHT its "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) status back in 1959. However, this designation is based on the amounts typically found in food products, and some regulatory and consumer advocacy groups argue that the safety of synthetic antioxidants like BHT deserves a modern re-evaluation.

The Arguments for BHT's Safety

Proponents of BHT's safety primarily point to its long-standing approval by regulatory bodies like the FDA. The GRAS status implies that, based on the low concentrations found in foods like chewing gum, BHT is not considered a health risk. Multiple studies support this position, with one 2000 Dutch study finding no increased risk of stomach cancer in individuals who consumed BHT in typical amounts. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) also regulates its use, allowing it in controlled amounts. Additionally, in cosmetic applications where BHT is also used, studies suggest that it does not significantly penetrate the skin and is efficiently metabolized and excreted by the body when absorbed.

The Arguments Against BHT's Safety

Despite its regulatory status, significant concerns surrounding BHT persist, largely fueled by animal studies and regulatory actions in other parts of the world. A key issue is that many studies showing adverse effects involved high doses of BHT, leading to potential health risks such as:

  • Organ System Toxicity: Animal studies have linked high doses to liver and kidney damage. BHT has also been associated with inflammatory effects in the lungs and potential heart damage.
  • Endocrine Disruption: Some research suggests BHT can interfere with hormone function, potentially acting as an endocrine disruptor. Some European authorities have listed BHT as a substance with potential endocrine-disrupting effects in animal studies.
  • Carcinogenicity: While human data is inconclusive, animal studies have raised concerns about BHT acting as a tumor promoter in certain situations. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has provided limited evidence for its carcinogenicity in animals.
  • Behavioral Effects: Some animal studies have shown links between BHT exposure and hyperactivity and altered behavior.
  • The Cocktail Effect: As highlighted by the Danish Consumer Council, while one piece of gum with BHT may not be problematic, cumulative exposure from multiple sources (food, cosmetics, etc.) is a concern that regulatory bodies are beginning to address.

Regulatory Actions and Consumer Trends

In response to these growing concerns, some regions are taking action. The European Union restricts or bans BHT in some foods, and a 2024 test by the Danish Consumer Council showed an increase in BHT-free chewing gum options. In the US, the FDA announced in May 2025 that it would accelerate the review of BHT and other food chemicals as part of a new post-market oversight program. This follows legislative action in states like Louisiana and Texas to restrict BHT in public schools. A trend toward "clean labeling" is pushing food manufacturers to voluntarily phase out controversial additives like BHT and replace them with natural alternatives.

BHT Gum vs. BHT-Free Gum Comparison

Feature BHT-Containing Chewing Gum BHT-Free (Natural) Chewing Gum
Preservatives Synthetic antioxidant BHT (E321) Natural antioxidants (e.g., tocopherols, rosemary extract)
Shelf Life Extended due to BHT's efficacy in preventing rancidity May be shorter; relies on natural preservatives and advanced packaging
Ingredient List Contains 'BHT' or 'E321' listed among the ingredients Often boasts 'no artificial preservatives' or lists natural antioxidants
Cost Typically more affordable due to low cost of BHT preservative Often more expensive due to cost of natural alternatives and production methods
Consumer Perception Viewed with caution by health-conscious consumers due to controversy Seen as a healthier or "cleaner" option by a growing market segment
Regulatory Status FDA-approved (GRAS), but facing increased state-level and federal re-evaluation Generally not subject to the same level of safety scrutiny as synthetic additives

Natural Alternatives to BHT in Gum

The push for cleaner ingredients has spurred innovation in natural food preservation. A number of natural substances offer effective antioxidant properties without the associated concerns of BHT.

  • Tocopherols (Vitamin E): A powerful antioxidant that can stabilize fats and oils. It is a safe and effective replacement used by many manufacturers.
  • Rosemary Extract: Derived from the rosemary plant, this extract contains carnosic acid and carnosol, which are potent antioxidants. The European Union approved its use in 2010, and it is frequently used to replace synthetic preservatives in products like chips and vegetable oils.
  • Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C): As an antioxidant, it can slow down the oxidation and ripening process, extending a food's shelf life.

Beyond natural ingredients, advanced manufacturing techniques such as modified atmosphere packaging can also reduce the need for synthetic preservatives.

How to Find BHT-Free Gum

Reading the ingredients list is the most direct way to determine if a gum contains BHT. Look for terms like "BHT" or "E321" on the packaging. A growing number of brands are marketing their products as "no artificial preservatives" or "clean label," signaling the absence of such ingredients. Choosing products from companies that explicitly advertise their use of natural alternatives like tocopherols or rosemary extract is another reliable method.

Conclusion

While the U.S. FDA continues to classify BHT in low amounts as generally safe for consumption, significant controversies remain regarding its potential health effects, particularly with long-term, cumulative exposure. The debate is complex, involving conflicting animal studies and limited human data. However, growing consumer preference for natural ingredients and recent regulatory actions abroad and within the US indicate a shift away from this synthetic preservative. Ultimately, whether BHT in gum is "bad for you" depends on your personal comfort level with the existing scientific research and your risk tolerance. For those with concerns, the good news is that viable, BHT-free alternatives are increasingly available, allowing for a more informed and conscious choice. You can stay up-to-date on FDA regulatory actions on their official website.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, BHT is banned or its use is restricted in certain foods in some countries, particularly in Europe. Additionally, states in the U.S. like California and Louisiana are taking steps to ban or restrict its use in school foods.

Chewing gum containing BHT is not considered to pose an acute or immediate health risk. The primary concern among health advocates is the potential long-term effect of cumulative exposure to small doses from various sources.

You can identify if your chewing gum contains BHT by reading the ingredients list on the packaging. Look for the acronym 'BHT' or the European food additive code 'E321'.

Natural preservatives used as alternatives to BHT include tocopherols (Vitamin E), rosemary extract, and ascorbic acid (Vitamin C). Many manufacturers are switching to these to meet consumer demand for cleaner ingredients.

Concerns surrounding BHT include potential organ toxicity (liver and kidneys), endocrine disruption, and carcinogenicity, based largely on findings from high-dose animal studies. However, human data is limited.

No, BHT is a versatile synthetic antioxidant used in a wide range of products besides chewing gum. These include other processed foods like cereals and snacks, cosmetics, and packaging materials.

The FDA has not formally changed its official stance that BHT is GRAS. However, in May 2025, the agency announced plans to begin a systematic review of BHT and other food chemicals due to rising concerns.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.