Skip to content

Is Chick-fil-A Mac and Cheese or Fries Worse for You?

3 min read

According to nutritionists and official data, Chick-fil-A's Mac and Cheese is often cited as the less healthy option, despite the popular perception that fries are always the worse choice. A side-by-side nutritional breakdown reveals surprising differences that answer the question: is Chick-fil-A mac and cheese or fries worse for you?.

Quick Summary

This article analyzes the nutritional content of Chick-fil-A's Mac and Cheese and Waffle Fries, focusing on key metrics like calories, fat, and sodium. It provides a detailed comparison, helping customers understand which side dish is the less healthy option. The content covers the impact of high sodium and fat, alternative healthier choices, and provides an expert-based final verdict.

Key Points

  • Mac and Cheese vs. Fries Calories: At 450 calories for a medium, the Mac and Cheese has more calories than the 420-calorie medium Waffle Fries.

  • Mac and Cheese Higher in Saturated Fat: The medium Mac and Cheese has a staggering 16g of saturated fat (80% DV), compared to just 4g in the medium Waffle Fries.

  • Mac and Cheese is a Sodium Bomb: With 1,190mg of sodium, the Mac and Cheese contains nearly five times the sodium of the medium Waffle Fries (240mg).

  • Fries are Higher in Carbs: The Waffle Fries have more total carbohydrates (45g) than the Mac and Cheese (28g), but the Mac and Cheese's fat and sodium are more concerning.

  • Mac and Cheese Provides More Protein: The Mac and Cheese offers 20g of protein compared to the fries' 5g, but this benefit is outweighed by its unhealthy fat and sodium content.

  • Consider Healthier Alternatives: For the health-conscious, options like the Kale Crunch Side, Fruit Cup, or Side Salad are significantly better choices than either the mac and cheese or fries.

In This Article

Unpacking the Nutritional Facts

When deciding between Chick-fil-A's creamy Mac and Cheese and their classic Waffle Fries, the choice seems simple. Most people assume the fried potatoes are the clear winner for the "less healthy" title. However, a deeper look at the nutritional information tells a different story. The data reveals that Mac and Cheese, particularly the medium size, contains significantly higher amounts of certain metrics like saturated fat and sodium, while the fries hold more carbohydrates.

The Breakdown: Mac and Cheese vs. Waffle Fries (Medium Sides)

To provide a clear comparison, here is a detailed nutritional breakdown based on the medium serving size for each side dish. Values may vary slightly by location and source but provide a consistent overall picture.

Mac and Cheese (Medium Side)

  • Calories: 450 calories
  • Total Fat: 29g
  • Saturated Fat: 16g (80% of Daily Value)
  • Sodium: 1,190mg (52% of Daily Value)
  • Carbohydrates: 28g
  • Protein: 20g

Waffle Fries (Medium Side)

  • Calories: 420 calories
  • Total Fat: 24g
  • Saturated Fat: 4g (20% of Daily Value)
  • Sodium: 240mg (10% of Daily Value)
  • Carbohydrates: 45g
  • Protein: 5g

Comparison Table

Nutritional Metric Mac and Cheese (Medium) Waffle Fries (Medium) Worse Off For...
Calories 450 420 Mac and Cheese
Total Fat 29g 24g Mac and Cheese
Saturated Fat 16g (80% DV) 4g (20% DV) Mac and Cheese
Sodium 1,190mg (52% DV) 240mg (10% DV) Mac and Cheese
Carbohydrates 28g 45g Waffle Fries
Protein 20g 5g Waffle Fries (less filling)

Deeper Dive: The Real Health Implications

While a higher carbohydrate count in fries might seem like a strike against them, the other nutritional metrics are far more concerning in the long term. The exorbitant saturated fat and sodium levels in the Mac and Cheese pose significant health risks. A single medium serving of Mac and Cheese nearly hits the recommended daily intake for saturated fat and is over half of the recommended daily intake for sodium.

Saturated Fat

High intake of saturated fat can lead to increased LDL cholesterol, which raises the risk of heart disease and stroke. The Mac and Cheese has four times the saturated fat of the Waffle Fries, which is a major red flag for cardiovascular health.

Sodium

Excessive sodium consumption is linked to high blood pressure, kidney issues, and other cardiovascular problems. With nearly five times the sodium of the fries, the Mac and Cheese is a sodium bomb. This is particularly concerning for individuals with or at risk for hypertension.

Carbohydrates

While the Waffle Fries contain more total carbohydrates, potatoes do offer some nutritional benefits like potassium and fiber. However, the frying process significantly diminishes these benefits and adds a high fat content. The Mac and Cheese has a lower carb count, but its fat, saturated fat, and sodium content are much more problematic.

The Takeaway

The protein content in the Mac and Cheese is higher than the fries (20g vs 5g), but this is not enough to offset its severely negative nutritional profile. The mac is high in unhealthy fats and sodium, making it a worse choice overall for regular consumption. While both are high-calorie, indulgent sides, the fries present a less severe nutritional hit.

Healthier Alternatives at Chick-fil-A

For those seeking a healthier side, Chick-fil-A offers several better options. These alternatives provide more nutrients and fewer unhealthy ingredients, allowing you to enjoy your meal without the heavy nutritional cost of the Mac and Cheese or fries.

Healthier side choices include:

  • Kale Crunch Side: A great low-calorie, low-sodium option with a good amount of fiber.
  • Side Salad: Paired with a light vinaigrette, this is a fresh, nutritious choice.
  • Fruit Cup: The lowest-calorie and most nutritious option available.
  • Grilled Nuggets: A lean, high-protein choice that can be ordered as a side.

For more detailed nutritional information on these and other menu items, you can visit the official Chick-fil-A nutrition guide.

Conclusion: Which is the Worse Offender?

Based on the nutritional data, Chick-fil-A's Mac and Cheese is the worse of the two side dishes. Its significantly higher saturated fat and sodium content pose greater health risks for regular consumption compared to the Waffle Fries. While both are best enjoyed as occasional treats rather than dietary staples, the mac and cheese should be reserved for true indulgences. The Waffle Fries, despite their fried nature, are the lesser of two evils when it comes to long-term health metrics. For those truly concerned about their diet, opting for a fruit cup, side salad, or Kale Crunch side is the best route.

Frequently Asked Questions

Chick-fil-A's medium Mac and Cheese has 450 calories, slightly more than the medium Waffle Fries, which contain 420 calories.

The Mac and Cheese has significantly more sodium, with a medium side containing 1,190mg, while the medium Waffle Fries have only 240mg.

The medium Mac and Cheese contains 16g of saturated fat (80% of DV), which is four times the amount found in the medium Waffle Fries (4g).

Yes, from a nutritional standpoint, the Waffle Fries are a slightly better choice. They contain lower levels of saturated fat and drastically less sodium than the Mac and Cheese.

Healthier alternatives include the Kale Crunch Side, Fruit Cup, or Side Salad. These options are much lower in calories, fat, and sodium compared to both the mac and cheese and fries.

The Mac and Cheese is one of the unhealthiest options due to its very high saturated fat and sodium content. For example, a medium size contains 1,190mg of sodium, over half the recommended daily intake.

Official and up-to-date nutritional information is available on the Chick-fil-A website.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.