Skip to content

Is it true that you should eat according to your blood type?

4 min read

Despite the popularity of the 'Eat Right 4 Your Type' book, multiple comprehensive scientific reviews have concluded there is no evidence to support the claims that you should eat according to your blood type. This article will delve into the lack of scientific backing and the potential issues associated with this pseudoscientific fad diet.

Quick Summary

The blood type diet, promoted by naturopath Peter D'Adamo, suggests specific foods are beneficial or harmful based on a person's ABO blood type. However, peer-reviewed scientific studies have found no evidence supporting these claims. Any health benefits observed are likely from generally healthier eating, not blood type.

Key Points

  • No Scientific Evidence: There is no scientific research to support the claim that eating according to your blood type offers any specific health benefits.

  • Origins in Pseudoscience: The diet, developed by naturopath Peter D'Adamo, is based on unproven evolutionary and biological theories.

  • Perceived Benefits Are Not Blood Type-Dependent: Any health improvements observed are likely the result of adopting general healthy eating habits and reducing processed foods, a common side effect of many restrictive diets.

  • Diet Can Be Unhealthily Restrictive: The diet's restrictions can lead to potential nutrient deficiencies and make achieving a balanced diet more difficult.

  • Individual Needs Are Complex: A person's age, gender, metabolism, lifestyle, and health conditions are far more significant factors for dietary needs than blood type.

  • Expert Consensus: Medical and nutritional experts widely agree that the blood type diet is not a valid or evidence-based approach to nutrition.

In This Article

The Origins of the Blood Type Diet

The blood type diet was first popularized by naturopathic physician Peter D'Adamo in his 1996 book, "Eat Right 4 Your Type". D'Adamo's theory is based on two main claims. First, he posits an evolutionary narrative where each blood type corresponds to a different ancestral diet: Type O for hunter-gatherers, Type A for agriculturalists, Type B for nomads, and Type AB as a more recent combination. Second, he claims that certain proteins in food, called lectins, are incompatible with specific blood types and cause health problems like agglutination (clumping) of red blood cells.

Scientific Evidence Debunking the Theory

The foundational hypotheses of the blood type diet have been widely discredited by the scientific and medical communities. For instance, the evolutionary claims lack support, and the notion that lectins in food cause adverse reactions based on blood type is unsubstantiated.

The Systematic Review of 2013

Perhaps the most significant blow to the blood type diet came from a systematic review published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2013. Researchers scoured over 1,400 scientific articles and found no evidence to validate the diet's purported benefits. The review concluded that studies are needed to compare the health outcomes of individuals on the diet versus those on a standard diet, suggesting the hypothesis was still unproven.

The 2014 University of Toronto Study

Following the 2013 review's call for more research, a 2014 study from the University of Toronto examined how participants' adherence to blood type diets affected cardiometabolic risk factors. The study assessed markers like insulin, cholesterol, and blood pressure. While researchers noted that certain dietary patterns (like the vegetarian Type A diet) were associated with improved health markers, these positive effects were observed across all blood types, not just the specified ones. This definitively demonstrated that any health benefits derived from the diet came from cutting out processed foods and eating healthier, not from a specific blood type interaction.

The 2020 Study on Plant-Based Diets

Further reinforcing these findings, a 2020 study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics placed participants of different blood types on a low-fat vegan diet. The results showed that blood type had no bearing on the cardiometabolic outcomes, including body weight, body fat, or lipid levels.

The Risks of Following the Blood Type Diet

While the concept of personalizing a diet seems appealing, following the blood type diet can pose risks due to its restrictive nature.

  • Nutrient Deficiencies: For instance, the Type O diet severely restricts grains and legumes, and the Type A diet eliminates meat, which can lead to deficiencies if not carefully managed.
  • Unnecessary Restriction: The diet removes many perfectly healthy food items for arbitrary reasons, potentially making a balanced diet more difficult to achieve and maintain.
  • Increased Costs: The recommendation to purchase organic food, as promoted for some blood types, can make the diet expensive to follow.

What Drives the Perceived Success?

If the scientific evidence is so clear, why do some people claim to have success with the blood type diet? The explanation is simple and consistent with how many fad diets gain traction.

List of Factors Contributing to Perceived Success

  • Focus on Whole Foods: The diet encourages the consumption of whole foods, fruits, and vegetables while limiting or eliminating processed foods, a practice that benefits nearly everyone regardless of blood type.
  • Calorie Restriction: The restrictive nature of the diet naturally leads to a reduction in overall caloric intake, which is a key factor in weight loss.
  • Placebo Effect: The psychological effect of following a specific, personalized plan can lead to a greater perception of well-being and health improvements.
  • Regular Exercise: D'Adamo's plans also incorporate exercise recommendations, which contribute to overall health and are responsible for many of the positive outcomes people experience.

Comparison of Blood Type Diet Claims vs. Scientific Reality

Feature Blood Type Diet Claims Scientific Reality
Dietary Personalization Foods should be strictly tailored to your blood type based on ancestral heritage. No evidence supports tailoring diets by blood type; individual metabolism is complex and unique.
Lectins' Role Incompatible lectins cause blood clumping (agglutination) and health issues. Cooking destroys most lectins, and evidence for blood type-specific lectin reactions is minimal.
Health Outcomes Following the specific diet improves health and prevents disease for your blood type. Any health improvements are due to general healthy eating practices and exercise, not blood type.
Evolutionary Basis Blood types evolved with different ancestral lifestyles (e.g., hunter vs. farmer). This evolutionary narrative is scientifically unproven and inaccurate.
Overall Efficacy A highly effective and personalized nutritional strategy. A scientifically baseless fad diet that carries risks of nutrient deficiency.

Conclusion

In summary, the notion that you should eat according to your blood type is not true and lacks any credible scientific evidence. The theory, popularized by Peter D'Adamo, relies on debunked evolutionary claims and an unfounded hypothesis about lectins. Numerous studies, including large systematic reviews, have found no association between blood type and the efficacy of a specific diet. Any positive outcomes people experience are more likely a result of incorporating general healthy eating habits, such as reducing processed foods and exercising, rather than any specific interaction with their blood type. For truly personalized and effective nutritional guidance, consulting a registered dietitian is a far more reliable approach than following a pseudoscientific fad.

References

  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. (2013). "Blood type diets lack supporting evidence: a systematic review."
  • PLoS ONE. (2014). "ABO Genotype, 'Blood-Type' Diet and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors."

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the blood type diet is not a scientifically proven way to lose weight. While some people may lose weight due to the diet's restrictive nature and emphasis on whole foods, this is not related to their specific blood type.

The diet's main theory, proposed by Peter D'Adamo, is that your blood type dictates your optimal diet based on evolutionary history and a claimed incompatibility between certain food lectins and blood types.

The theory is considered false because cooking destroys most lectins, and research has shown that lectins do not react in a blood type-specific manner as the diet suggests. Most lectins that do cause reactions are not blood type specific.

While it is generally not considered harmful for healthy individuals, the diet's restrictions can lead to nutritional deficiencies if not carefully managed. It can also be psychologically taxing to restrict many healthy food groups.

A more effective and evidence-based approach to personalized nutrition is to consult with a registered dietitian. They can provide tailored advice based on your individual health needs, lifestyle, and medical history.

Many people feel better because the diet promotes eating whole, unprocessed foods and includes exercise, which improves health for everyone. The psychological effect of following a structured plan can also play a role.

Systematic reviews of the scientific literature have found no credible evidence supporting the health claims of the blood type diet. Any studies that did find positive health markers demonstrated that these benefits were independent of blood type.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.