Skip to content

Is MrBeast lunchly healthy? An expert nutrition review

4 min read

According to a Consumer Reports investigation in July 2025, MrBeast’s Lunchly kits were found to contain concerning levels of heavy metals, including lead. This immediately raises questions about the brand's marketing as a healthier alternative, leaving parents to question: is MrBeast lunchly healthy?

Quick Summary

An analysis of the Lunchly meal kit reveals it is a highly processed food product despite claims of being a healthier alternative. Experts cite high sodium, saturated fat, and detected heavy metals as significant concerns for children's nutrition and overall health.

Key Points

  • Highly Processed: Experts categorize Lunchly as ultra-processed, despite marketing as a healthier option.

  • High Sodium, High Risk: Lunchly's high sodium content can significantly contribute to a child's daily limit, posing a risk for elevated blood pressure.

  • Sugar Swap: Lower sugar counts are achieved by using artificial sweeteners in the Prime drink, which are not recommended for children.

  • Heavy Metal Concerns: Testing found detectable levels of lead and cadmium, mainly from the included chocolate bar.

  • Influencer Marketing: The product heavily leverages creator fame to appeal to a young audience, raising ethical concerns about its impact on children's health decisions.

  • Better Alternatives Exist: Truly healthy and balanced lunches are best made from whole food ingredients, such as a DIY bento box.

In This Article

The Appeal of the Influencer Lunch Kit

In late 2024, social media heavyweights MrBeast, KSI, and Logan Paul launched Lunchly, a new line of pre-packaged meal kits designed to compete directly with Lunchables. Leveraging their massive online influence, the brand was marketed as a “better-for-you” option, with promotional materials highlighting marginally lower calorie counts and sugar content compared to its decades-old competitor. The inclusion of a Prime Hydration drink and a Feastables chocolate bar, two other successful influencer products, further solidified its appeal to a young, internet-savvy audience. For busy parents, the promise of a convenient yet supposedly healthier meal for their kids was a compelling pitch. However, a closer look at the actual nutritional composition and independent testing revealed a different story.

The Marketing vs. the Nutritional Reality

Expert analyses, including comprehensive testing by Consumer Reports, quickly challenged the notion that Lunchly represents a significant improvement in health or nutrition. While the sugar content is indeed lower in Lunchly kits, it’s primarily due to replacing the sugary drink with Prime Hydration, which uses artificial sweeteners like sucralose and acesulfame potassium. Health experts, including the World Health Organization (WHO), caution against relying on these artificial sweeteners, especially for children. Furthermore, looking beyond just calories and sugar reveals a much less favorable nutritional profile.

Key Nutritional Concerns with Lunchly

  • High Sodium Levels: Despite not being featured prominently in the brand’s marketing, Lunchly kits are packed with high amounts of sodium. Some kits contribute nearly half of a young child’s recommended maximum daily sodium intake, putting them at increased risk for elevated blood pressure and developing a lasting preference for salty foods.
  • Ultra-Processed Ingredients: Nutritionists uniformly categorize Lunchly as an ultra-processed food. The ingredients in the main meal components—like processed turkey, pepperoni, and crackers—are highly refined and often contain additives and preservatives.
  • Heavy Metals: Consumer Reports testing detected measurable levels of lead and cadmium in the Lunchly kits. The chocolate bar, a key component, was identified as a significant contributor to the lead content. Experts warn that no amount of lead exposure is considered safe for children, and cumulative exposure can have serious health consequences.
  • Lack of Whole Foods: A major critique from health professionals is the absence of whole fruits and vegetables in the kit. These vital food groups provide essential vitamins, minerals, and fiber that are missing from Lunchly, creating an incomplete and unbalanced meal.

Lunchly vs. Traditional Lunch Kits: A Comparison

While Lunchly positions itself as a healthier evolution of the classic lunch kit, a head-to-head comparison reveals that the differences are not as substantial as the marketing suggests. Both products fall into the category of highly processed foods, with similar fundamental nutritional flaws.

Feature Lunchly (MrBeast) Lunchables (Traditional)
Processing Level Ultra-processed Ultra-processed
Added Sugar Lower, achieved with artificial sweeteners Higher, from real sugar in drinks/sweets
Artificial Sweeteners Yes (in Prime Hydration) Some (in Capri Sun, if included)
Sodium High, concerning levels detected High, similar to Lunchly
Heavy Metals Detectable levels of lead and cadmium found Detectable levels of lead and cadmium found
Marketing Driven by social media influencers Traditional brand marketing

Making a Truly Healthy Lunch Box

Given the expert consensus that Lunchly is not a truly healthy option for regular consumption, parents might wonder what to pack instead. The key is to focus on whole, minimally processed foods that offer a better balance of nutrients. Creating a DIY lunch kit in a bento-style box is an excellent way to capture the fun, interactive appeal of pre-packaged kits while controlling the quality of ingredients.

  • Protein: Use lean deli meat (turkey or ham), hard-boiled eggs, cheese cubes, or hummus for a protein boost.
  • Whole Grains: Include whole-wheat crackers, whole-grain pita bread, or pasta salad for sustained energy.
  • Veggies: Pack crunchy, bite-sized vegetables like baby carrots, cucumber slices, and bell pepper strips.
  • Fruit: Add a variety of fresh fruits such as berries, apple slices, or grapes.
  • Treats (in moderation): If including a treat, opt for smaller, less-processed options like a piece of dark chocolate or a homemade cookie.

Conclusion: The Bottom Line on Lunchly's Health Claims

Despite the celebrity endorsement and clever marketing, the consensus from nutrition experts is clear: Lunchly is not a healthy meal for children. While it may offer a slight reduction in calories and sugar compared to competitors, it remains a highly processed food product with significant nutritional drawbacks, including high sodium content and potentially harmful heavy metals. The powerful influencer marketing, which targets young and impressionable audiences, is of particular concern to public health experts. The findings reinforce the importance of prioritizing whole foods and homemade meals as the best options for children’s health, reserving ultra-processed kits like Lunchly for occasional treats at most. For further reading on the heavy metal findings and expert analysis, you can review the Consumer Reports investigation into Lunchly and other snack kits.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, despite being marketed as a healthier alternative to other snack kits, nutrition experts do not consider Lunchly a genuinely healthy meal. It is still an ultra-processed food with high levels of sodium, saturated fat, and artificial sweeteners.

According to expert reviews, Lunchly contains concerningly high levels of sodium and saturated fat. While the sugar count is lower, it relies on artificial sweeteners, and the meal kit lacks essential nutrients and fiber found in whole fruits and vegetables.

Yes, a Consumer Reports investigation found detectable levels of lead and cadmium in the Lunchly kits, with the chocolate bar being a significant source of lead.

Lunchly is categorized as ultra-processed because it is made from highly refined ingredients, including processed meats and additives. It's an industrialized product with little to no resemblance to whole foods.

The Prime Hydration drink included in Lunchly uses artificial sweeteners. Health organizations like the WHO advise against the use of these sweeteners, especially for children, due to insufficient long-term research on their effects.

From a nutritional standpoint, experts do not consider Lunchly to be meaningfully healthier than Lunchables. While it may contain less sugar, it has similar high levels of sodium, saturated fat, and other drawbacks associated with ultra-processed kits.

A truly healthy alternative is to create a homemade lunch kit using whole foods. Options include whole-grain crackers with cheese and lean deli meat, fresh fruits and vegetables, and a healthy dip like hummus.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.