Skip to content

Is Salmon Better Than Tuna for Protein?

4 min read

According to the USDA, a 3-ounce serving of cooked yellowfin tuna offers approximately 25 grams of protein, often slightly higher than a similar serving of salmon. This initial insight raises the question for many health-conscious individuals: is salmon better than tuna for protein, or does another factor make one superior?

Quick Summary

A comprehensive comparison of salmon and tuna, evaluating their protein content, fat profiles, and overall nutritional value. Tuna is leaner with more protein per ounce, while salmon is richer in omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin D. The best choice depends on individual dietary goals.

Key Points

  • Protein Content: Tuna generally has a slightly higher protein content per ounce, making it ideal for those seeking lean protein.

  • Omega-3s: Salmon is significantly richer in omega-3 fatty acids, offering superior benefits for heart and brain health.

  • Mercury Levels: Salmon has lower mercury levels than tuna, making it a safer option for more frequent consumption.

  • Nutrient Differences: Salmon is higher in vitamin D and B12, while tuna contains more B3, B6, and selenium.

  • Dietary Goals: The best choice depends on your health focus; tuna for max lean protein, salmon for omega-3 benefits.

  • Combine for Balance: For a comprehensive nutrient profile, alternate between consuming both salmon and tuna.

In This Article

Tuna vs. Salmon: A Breakdown of Protein and Beyond

When it comes to sourcing high-quality, complete protein, both salmon and tuna are excellent choices. They provide all nine essential amino acids needed for muscle repair, immune function, and other vital bodily processes. However, a closer look at their nutritional profiles reveals distinct differences that can help you decide which is best for your specific dietary needs.

The Lean Protein Champion: Tuna

Tuna, particularly leaner species like skipjack or yellowfin, consistently offers a higher protein-to-calorie ratio than salmon. A 3-ounce serving of cooked yellowfin tuna provides around 25 grams of protein for approximately 110 calories. This makes tuna a top choice for those aiming to maximize their protein intake while minimizing fat and calories, which can be beneficial for weight management. Canned light tuna, often from smaller skipjack species, is also a budget-friendly and accessible high-protein option.

The Omega-3 Powerhouse: Salmon

While tuna has more protein per ounce, salmon is celebrated for its significantly higher content of healthy fats, particularly omega-3 fatty acids like EPA and DHA. A 3-ounce serving of wild sockeye salmon can deliver over 1.5 grams of omega-3s, far surpassing the amounts found in most tuna. These fatty acids are crucial for supporting heart health, reducing inflammation, and boosting brain function. Salmon's richer fat profile also contributes to a higher calorie count and a more robust flavor and moist texture.

A Deeper Dive into Nutritional Differences

Beyond the headline-grabbing protein and omega-3 content, salmon and tuna differ in their micronutrient offerings.

  • Vitamins: Salmon is a superior source of vitamin D, which is essential for bone health and immune function, and a better source of vitamin B12. Tuna, on the other hand, is generally richer in vitamins B3 (niacin) and B6.
  • Minerals: Tuna often contains higher amounts of minerals like selenium, phosphorus, and magnesium. However, canned salmon, which often includes edible bones, can be an excellent source of calcium. Both are good sources of selenium, a powerful antioxidant.
  • Mercury Content: Mercury is a concern for large predatory fish like tuna, which can accumulate higher levels over their lifespan. Salmon is a smaller fish and generally has a much lower mercury content, making it a safer option for frequent consumption, especially for pregnant women and young children.

Which Fish Is Right for Your Goals?

The best choice between salmon and tuna ultimately depends on your individual health priorities. Are you focused on maximizing lean protein intake or prioritizing heart-healthy omega-3s?

Feature Salmon Tuna
Protein Lower per ounce (approx. 22g per 3 oz) Higher per ounce (approx. 25g per 3 oz)
Fat & Calories Higher in fat and calories; rich in healthy omega-3s Lower in fat and calories; very lean
Omega-3s Significantly higher content Lower content, though albacore has more than light
Vitamin D Excellent source Good source
Mercury Low levels, safer for frequent consumption Higher levels, depending on species; moderate consumption advised
Primary Benefit Heart and brain health due to omega-3s Lean, high-protein source for weight management

Strategies for Smart Seafood Consumption

For a balanced diet, incorporating both salmon and tuna can provide a wider range of nutrients. Consider rotating your intake to reap the unique benefits of each. For example, enjoy salmon twice a week for your omega-3s and vitamin D, and supplement with canned light tuna for a protein boost on other days. You can integrate these fish into various meals with ease.

Here are some simple ways to enjoy both:

  • For Salmon: Bake a fillet with herbs, add smoked salmon to salads, or make salmon cakes. The fattier nature of salmon makes it excellent for grilling or pan-searing. The omega-3s in fatty fish are essential for brain health throughout the lifespan.
  • For Tuna: Use canned tuna in salads, sandwiches, or mix with avocado for a protein-rich, satisfying snack. Fresh tuna steaks can be seared quickly and served rare for a delicious meal. The lean protein helps you feel full longer and can assist with weight management.

Conclusion: Which is Better?

Ultimately, determining if salmon is better than tuna for protein is not a simple yes or no. Tuna typically has a slight edge in pure protein content per ounce, making it a top choice for those prioritizing lean muscle-building macros. However, salmon's higher omega-3 fatty acid profile offers superior benefits for heart and brain health, which are crucial components of a healthy diet. Both fish provide complete, high-quality protein and valuable micronutrients. For optimal nutrition, a combination of both is recommended, allowing you to leverage their individual strengths while being mindful of mercury levels, particularly with tuna consumption.

For further reading on the health benefits of seafood, the American Heart Association offers helpful recommendations for incorporating fish into a healthy eating plan (www.heart.org).

Frequently Asked Questions

Canned tuna typically provides slightly more protein per ounce than canned salmon. However, both are excellent sources of high-quality, complete protein.

Salmon is better for heart health due to its significantly higher concentration of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA), which are known to reduce inflammation and support cardiovascular function.

No, canned salmon generally has very low mercury levels. Due to its smaller size, salmon accumulates far less mercury than larger, predatory fish like many tuna species.

Yes, health experts recommend eating both salmon and tuna to get a wider range of nutrients. Just be mindful of mercury levels in tuna by choosing smaller species like canned light tuna and limiting overall consumption, especially if you are pregnant or feeding young children.

Per ounce, fresh tuna is leaner and higher in protein than fresh salmon. Fresh salmon contains more fat, though it is the heart-healthy omega-3 kind.

Salmon's higher fat content comes from healthy omega-3s, which increase satiety and can aid in weight management. While higher in calories than tuna, these healthy fats are beneficial. For a lower-calorie, leaner protein, tuna is the better option.

The primary benefit of eating salmon over tuna is its much higher omega-3 fatty acid content, which offers potent anti-inflammatory effects and supports brain and heart health.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.