Skip to content

Is Spinach Better Than Beets for Iron?

3 min read

While spinach is widely promoted for its iron content, boasting around 2.7 mg per 100 grams cooked, the story behind its effectiveness for iron absorption is more complex. This comparison explores the total iron content versus how much the body can actually use, which is critical for making informed dietary choices for iron intake.

Quick Summary

This article analyzes spinach and beets to determine which vegetable is a better source of dietary iron. It covers total iron quantity, bioavailability, and the impact of other compounds like oxalates on absorption.

Key Points

  • Spinach has more total iron: On a gram-for-gram basis, spinach contains a higher quantity of total iron than beet root, but this doesn't equate to superior absorption.

  • Oxalates in spinach hinder absorption: Spinach contains high levels of oxalates that bind to iron, significantly reducing the amount your body can use.

  • Bioavailability is key: The ability of the body to absorb a nutrient is more important than the total amount, and beets may offer more bioavailable iron than spinach.

  • Vitamin C boosts non-heme iron absorption: Both spinach and beets provide non-heme iron, and consuming them with vitamin C-rich foods can significantly increase absorption.

  • Cooking spinach reduces oxalates: Heat helps to break down oxalates in spinach, slightly improving its iron bioavailability.

  • Beet greens are also a good source: Don't discard the beet greens, as they also contain a notable amount of iron with fewer absorption inhibitors than spinach.

  • Context matters for dietary strategy: For those focusing solely on iron absorption from these two options, beets might be a better choice, but including both with absorption-enhancing strategies is best for overall nutrition.

In This Article

Spinach vs. Beets: The Nutritional Showdown for Iron

For decades, spinach has held a reputation as an iron powerhouse, largely thanks to a misplaced decimal point in early nutritional research and the popular character Popeye. While spinach does contain a notable amount of iron, around 3.57 mg per 100g raw, this figure doesn't tell the whole story. The crucial factor often overlooked is the iron's bioavailability—how efficiently the body can absorb and utilize it. In contrast, beets contain less total iron, about 1.09 mg per 100g raw, but their iron may be more accessible.

The Iron Absorption Challenge: Oxalates and Enhancers

The primary reason spinach's iron is not as easily absorbed as once believed is the presence of oxalates. These compounds bind to iron during digestion, creating a compound that the body cannot easily absorb. Therefore, even with a higher total iron count, a significant portion of spinach's iron may never be utilized. This is why pairing spinach with vitamin C-rich foods, such as lemon juice or bell peppers, is crucial for improving absorption, as vitamin C helps convert the non-heme iron into a more usable form.

Beets, on the other hand, contain fewer iron-inhibiting compounds than spinach. They also contain vitamin C, which aids in the absorption process. Furthermore, studies have shown both beet and spinach juice can effectively increase hemoglobin levels in iron-deficient individuals, indicating both can be valuable dietary additions. The key lies in strategic food pairings to maximize the non-heme iron absorption that both vegetables provide.

Comparison Table: Spinach vs. Beets for Iron

Feature Spinach Beets (Root)
Total Iron Content (Raw, 100g) ~3.57 mg ~1.09 mg
Iron Type Non-heme Non-heme
Iron Inhibitors High in oxalates, significantly reducing bioavailability Low in iron-inhibiting compounds
Iron Enhancers Contains vitamin C, which enhances absorption Contains vitamin C, which enhances absorption
Bioavailability Lower due to oxalates, improved with vitamin C Better due to lower inhibiting compounds
Best Preparation for Iron Cooked (reduces oxalates) and paired with vitamin C Raw or cooked; paired with vitamin C
Overall Recommendation Excellent source, but requires strategic pairing for maximum benefit Good source, with potentially higher absorption rate than spinach

Maximizing Iron Absorption from Plant-Based Sources

To get the most out of the non-heme iron found in spinach and beets, consider these strategies:

  • Pair with Vitamin C: Always combine these vegetables with a vitamin C source like citrus fruits, bell peppers, or tomatoes.
  • Cook Your Spinach: Cooking spinach can reduce its oxalate content, thereby making its iron more accessible.
  • Avoid Calcium-Rich Foods: Consume calcium-rich foods like milk and cheese at separate times from iron-rich meals, as calcium can interfere with iron absorption.
  • Limit Polyphenols: Avoid drinking coffee or tea around the time you consume iron-rich vegetables, as the polyphenols they contain can inhibit absorption.

Beyond Iron: A Look at Complete Nutritional Profiles

While this comparison focuses on iron, both vegetables offer a wealth of other health benefits. Spinach is an exceptional source of vitamins K and A, folate, and magnesium. Beets are rich in folate, manganese, and potassium, and contain betalains, powerful antioxidants that contribute to their vibrant color. Therefore, incorporating both into a balanced diet is beneficial for overall health. The choice of which is 'better' for iron depends entirely on your dietary habits and ability to maximize absorption.

Conclusion

In the debate of which is better for iron, the answer isn't as simple as comparing raw numbers. While spinach contains more total iron, its high oxalate content makes the iron less bioavailable. Beets, with lower inhibiting compounds, may offer more accessible iron, particularly from the greens. Ultimately, neither vegetable is a perfect iron bullet, and both require thoughtful preparation and pairing to maximize iron intake. For optimal iron absorption from these plant-based sources, focusing on combination with vitamin C is the most effective strategy. A balanced diet including both, alongside other iron sources and enhancers, is the most robust approach to meeting your nutritional needs. The National Institutes of Health provides comprehensive information on iron and how to optimize its absorption.

Frequently Asked Questions

While spinach contains a higher total amount of iron per serving, the high oxalate content in spinach significantly hinders its absorption. In contrast, the iron in beets, especially their greens, is more readily absorbed by the body.

The main difference is bioavailability. Spinach's non-heme iron is poorly absorbed due to high oxalate levels, whereas the non-heme iron in beets is less inhibited and thus more accessible to the body.

To maximize absorption from either vegetable, pair them with a food high in vitamin C, such as bell peppers, citrus fruits, or tomatoes. For spinach, cooking it can also help reduce the oxalate content.

No, it is not advisable to rely solely on spinach for your iron needs. The poor absorption rate of its iron makes it an unreliable primary source. A balanced diet with diverse iron sources is a much more effective strategy.

Some studies suggest that beet greens may provide a more bioavailable form of iron than spinach due to having fewer oxalate compounds that inhibit absorption. The greens are a nutrient-rich part of the beet plant that should not be overlooked.

Beyond spinach and beets, other excellent plant-based sources of non-heme iron include lentils, tofu, pumpkin seeds, kale, and fortified cereals.

Cooking can increase the absorption of iron from spinach by reducing the level of oxalates. Cooking does not significantly alter the iron bioavailability of beets in a negative way, but pairing with vitamin C remains key for optimal absorption.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.