Skip to content

Is Stevia Antibacterial? What the Science Says About Its Health Benefits

4 min read

Multiple scientific studies have demonstrated that extracts from the stevia plant possess significant antibacterial and antimicrobial potential, particularly when certain solvents are used for extraction. This surprising attribute of the popular natural sweetener has prompted further investigation into its potential applications beyond just replacing sugar.

Quick Summary

Stevia extracts show antibacterial properties in lab studies, with efficacy varying based on concentration and extraction method. Researchers have observed its potential against oral bacteria and other common strains, though it is typically less potent than commercial antibiotics and more research is needed.

Key Points

  • Proven Antibacterial Activity: Scientific studies confirm that crude stevia extracts, particularly those using ethanol, possess antibacterial properties against several bacterial strains, including S. aureus and E. coli.

  • Effective Against Oral Bacteria: Stevia is non-cariogenic and has shown the ability to inhibit the growth of dental plaque-forming bacteria like Streptococcus mutans.

  • Dependent on Extraction: The method of extraction is crucial; ethanolic extracts typically show stronger antibacterial effects than water-based extracts.

  • Polyphenols are Key: The antimicrobial action is likely attributed to the rich composition of polyphenols, flavonoids, and other phytochemicals in the plant extract, not just the sweet glycosides.

  • Limitations of Lab Studies: Most evidence comes from in vitro (lab) studies, and more research is needed to confirm the effects in humans and with commercially available, purified products.

  • Not a Replacement for Antibiotics: While it has antimicrobial potential, stevia is not a substitute for clinical antibiotics and is generally less potent.

In This Article

Understanding Stevia's Antimicrobial Properties

Stevia rebaudiana, the plant from which stevia is derived, has long been used in traditional medicine in South America. While its primary commercial use is as a zero-calorie sweetener, its broader biological effects, particularly its antimicrobial potential, have been a focus of modern research. The plant contains a complex mixture of bioactive compounds, including steviol glycosides and various polyphenols, flavonoids, and tannins, which are believed to contribute to its medicinal properties. The specific nature and potency of these properties can depend heavily on how the extract is prepared.

Evidence from Scientific Research

Numerous in vitro studies—experiments conducted in a test tube or culture dish—have investigated whether stevia extracts are antibacterial and have yielded positive results. These studies typically involve exposing various bacterial strains to different concentrations and types of stevia extracts and measuring the resulting zone of inhibition, or area of no bacterial growth. Findings consistently suggest that stevia extracts, especially those prepared with organic solvents, possess inhibitory effects on bacterial growth, although this activity is generally less powerful than that of conventional antibiotics.

Stevia's Effect on Oral Bacteria

One area of significant research interest is stevia's impact on oral health. The sweetener is non-cariogenic, meaning it does not cause tooth decay, unlike sugar which feeds harmful oral bacteria. In vitro studies have shown that stevia extracts can inhibit the growth of bacteria associated with dental caries, such as Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Furthermore, some research suggests stevia can help reduce plaque formation by inhibiting the development of bacterial biofilms in the mouth. These properties make it a beneficial ingredient in oral hygiene products like toothpaste and mouthwash.

Studies on General Bacterial Strains

Beyond oral health, stevia extracts have been tested against a variety of other clinically relevant bacterial pathogens. One study evaluated ethanolic and water extracts of Stevia rebaudiana against several strains, including Gram-positive bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus and Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Gram-negative bacteria such as Salmonella typhi and Escherichia coli. Results showed that the ethanolic extract had higher antibacterial activity against all tested strains compared to the water extract. Similar findings were reported by researchers at Jiangnan University, who found that stevia polyphenols had stronger antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria like B. subtilis and S. aureus than against Gram-negative ones.

Comparing Stevia Extracts

As evidenced by scientific literature, the method of extraction significantly influences the antibacterial potential of stevia. Below is a comparison of different stevia extracts and their observed efficacy in laboratory settings.

Extraction Method Observed Antibacterial Activity Potency Relative to Antibiotics Studied Microorganisms
Ethanolic Extract High inhibition zones observed against tested bacteria. Lower than commercial antibiotics but significant. E. coli, S. aureus, L. acidophilus, S. typhi.
Water Extract Significantly lower or no activity compared to ethanolic extract. Negligible in comparison to standard drugs. Same as ethanolic extract, with minimal effect.
Polyphenol Extract Stronger activity against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative. Much weaker than broad-spectrum antibiotics like tetracycline. E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis.

The Mechanism Behind Stevia's Antibacterial Action

The exact mechanism by which stevia exerts its antibacterial effects is still under investigation, but research points to several potential actions. Stevia's rich composition of phytochemicals, particularly the polyphenols and flavonoids, are thought to be key players. These compounds can disrupt bacterial cell membranes, leading to the leakage of intracellular materials and subsequent cell death. The specific glycosides, such as stevioside and rebaudioside A, may also play a role. However, it's the synergistic effect of the full spectrum of compounds in the plant extract that likely provides the overall antimicrobial benefits. This distinguishes crude extracts from highly refined stevia sweeteners, which contain only the sweet glycosides and lack the wider array of bioactive compounds.

Limitations and Future Research

While promising, the findings on stevia's antibacterial potential primarily come from in vitro studies. This means results cannot be directly applied to human health without further research. In vivo studies (conducted in living organisms) and clinical trials are necessary to confirm if these effects translate to the human body. Additionally, most studies have focused on crude extracts prepared with specific solvents, which differ from the highly purified stevia products available on supermarket shelves. More research is needed to determine if the commercial products retain any significant antibacterial properties. The concentration and formulation also play a critical role, as some studies required very high concentrations of the extract to achieve notable inhibition. Further investigation into the specific active compounds and their mechanisms will be crucial for developing stevia-based therapeutic agents. For a deeper scientific dive, see this article on the antimicrobial potential of Stevia rebaudiana leaves extract.

Conclusion

In conclusion, existing scientific research confirms that certain preparations of stevia, particularly crude plant extracts rich in polyphenols and flavonoids, do exhibit significant antibacterial activity in laboratory settings. These effects are most notable against certain Gram-positive bacteria and strains linked to oral health. However, this potential is largely dependent on the extraction method and concentration. It is important to distinguish between these crude extracts and the highly refined, pure stevia sweeteners commonly found in stores, as the latter may lack the full spectrum of antimicrobial compounds. While not a replacement for conventional antibiotics, stevia's antibacterial properties offer intriguing possibilities for natural applications in food preservation and oral hygiene. Continued research is vital to fully understand its therapeutic potential and limitations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Highly purified stevia sweeteners available commercially may not retain the same antibacterial properties as crude plant extracts, as the purification process removes many of the active phytochemicals responsible for the antimicrobial action.

No, stevia should not be used as a treatment for bacterial infections. The antibacterial effects have primarily been observed in lab settings and are not as potent as pharmaceutical antibiotics. Medical advice should always be sought for treating infections.

Stevia is non-cariogenic and can inhibit the growth of certain oral bacteria like Streptococcus mutans that contribute to tooth decay and plaque formation.

Based on current research, stevia extracts prepared using ethanol or methanol tend to show stronger antibacterial activity than those using water as a solvent.

Some studies suggest stevia has some antifungal activity, though often weaker than its antibacterial effects. However, specific research has shown little to no effect against certain fungal strains.

The antibacterial effects are primarily attributed to the non-sweet components of the plant, such as polyphenols and flavonoids, rather than the sweet steviol glycosides themselves.

Negative side effects related specifically to the antibacterial properties have not been widely reported, but more research is needed on its overall safety profile as a natural antimicrobial. Stevia is generally recognized as safe for consumption, but potential interactions or effects from crude extracts require further study.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.