Skip to content

Isomalt vs. Erythritol: Is Isomalt the Same as Erythritol?

4 min read

Over 90% of sugar substitutes used in candies and baked goods are sugar alcohols, but despite belonging to the same family, isomalt and erythritol are not the same. While both offer a way to enjoy sweetness without high calories or a significant blood sugar spike, they differ fundamentally in their production, metabolism, and application. Understanding their distinct characteristics is key to choosing the right sweetener for your dietary needs and culinary projects.

Quick Summary

Isomalt and erythritol are both sugar alcohols but differ significantly. Erythritol is zero-calorie and gentle on digestion, while isomalt contains fewer calories than sugar but can cause digestive upset in large amounts. They have different culinary applications, with isomalt being ideal for hard candies and erythritol excelling in baking.

Key Points

  • Not the Same: Isomalt and erythritol are both sugar alcohols but are chemically distinct.

  • Different Calories: Erythritol is near zero-calorie, while isomalt has about half the calories of sugar.

  • Digestive Comfort: Erythritol is typically much easier on the digestive system and less likely to cause gas or bloating.

  • Culinary Applications Vary: Isomalt is preferred for hard candy and sugar art, whereas erythritol is more commonly used in general baking.

  • Cooling Effect: Erythritol produces a noticeable cooling sensation, a trait that isomalt lacks.

  • Glycemic Impact: Both have a low glycemic impact, but erythritol's is effectively zero, making it a reliable choice for diabetics.

  • Metabolism Differences: Erythritol is absorbed and excreted without metabolism, while isomalt is partially digested.

In This Article

Understanding Sugar Alcohols: More Than Just Sweetness

Before diving into the specifics, it's helpful to understand what sugar alcohols, or polyols, are. Despite their name, they are neither sugar nor alcohol. They are carbohydrates that are only partially digested by the body, leading to fewer calories and less impact on blood glucose levels compared to traditional sugar. The main metabolic pathway difference is where the distinction between isomalt and erythritol lies.

What is Erythritol?

Erythritol is a naturally occurring polyol found in some fruits and fermented foods. It is produced commercially by fermenting a sugar (often from corn) with yeast. A unique characteristic of erythritol is that most of it is absorbed into the bloodstream but is not metabolized by the body. Instead, it is excreted in the urine, leaving a nearly zero-calorie impact and a minimal effect on blood sugar or insulin levels.

One of the most noticeable features of erythritol is its "cooling" sensation on the tongue, similar to mint, which is a result of an endothermic reaction. This effect can be a pro or con depending on the application. For baking, it works well but can sometimes crystallize, which may alter the texture of the final product.

What is Isomalt?

Isomalt is a sugar alcohol made from real sugar (sucrose) through a two-stage process. First, an enzyme converts the sucrose into isomaltulose, which is then hydrogenated to form isomalt. It is an equimolar mixture of two disaccharides. Isomalt has about half the calories of sugar and a lower glycemic index, but unlike erythritol, it is partially metabolized by the body.

Unlike erythritol, isomalt has a minimal cooling effect and superior technical properties, making it ideal for certain culinary uses. It is particularly favored for candy making and sugar decorations because of its high resistance to humidity, which prevents it from becoming sticky.

Comparison: Isomalt vs. Erythritol

While both are sugar replacers, their differences make them suitable for distinct applications. Here is a detailed breakdown:

Feature Isomalt Erythritol
Source Derived from beet sugar. Found in fruits; commercially produced from fermented corn.
Calories ~2 calories per gram. ~0.2 calories per gram (virtually zero-calorie).
Glycemic Index Low GI, raises blood sugar only minimally. Zero GI, no effect on blood sugar or insulin levels.
Digestive Tolerance Can cause gastrointestinal discomfort (bloating, gas, laxative effect) when consumed in large amounts, as it is only partially digested. Highly digestible and less likely to cause digestive issues than other polyols, even in larger quantities.
Culinary Uses Favored for sugar-free hard candies, caramel, and confectionery decorations due to its moisture resistance. Used in a wide range of sugar-free foods, beverages, and baked goods.
Sweetness 45-65% as sweet as sugar. ~70% as sweet as sugar.
Cooling Effect Minimal. Pronounced, similar to mint.

Culinary Applications: Choosing the Right Sweetener

Your choice between isomalt and erythritol often depends on what you're making.

Uses for Isomalt:

  • Hard Candy & Lollipops: Its high resistance to moisture and tendency to crystallize beautifully make it perfect for clear, hard sugar confections.
  • Sugar Art: Isomalt's stability is what makes intricate, pulled-sugar sculptures and decorations possible for professional cake decorators.
  • Coatings: It is used in coatings for candies and chewing gums because it is less sticky and more durable than other options.

Uses for Erythritol:

  • Baking: Works well as a granular sugar substitute in cakes, cookies, and other baked goods, though sometimes with a risk of crystallization.
  • Beverages: Dissolves well in liquids and is excellent for sweetening coffee, tea, and other drinks without adding calories.
  • General Sweetening: Can be used as a general-purpose sweetener in a variety of low-carb and keto recipes.

Potential Health Implications

Both sweeteners are generally considered safe by regulatory bodies. However, their differing metabolic pathways lead to different side effects.

  • Gastrointestinal Effects: While all sugar alcohols can have a laxative effect, erythritol is much better tolerated than isomalt and other polyols like xylitol or maltitol. This is because erythritol is absorbed before it can reach the large intestine, where fermentation typically occurs.
  • Blood Sugar Impact: Both have a minimal impact on blood glucose, but erythritol has a true zero glycemic index, making it a more conservative choice for individuals strictly managing blood sugar levels, such as those with diabetes.

Conclusion: Not the Same, But Both Effective

Ultimately, the question, "is isomalt the same as erythritol?" has a clear answer: no. While they both function as low-calorie sugar replacers and belong to the sugar alcohol family, their differences are critical. Erythritol is a near-zero-calorie option with excellent digestive tolerance, making it a versatile sweetener for general use, especially in baking. Isomalt, with its slightly higher calorie count but superior technical properties, is the preferred choice for professional confectioners creating hard candies and sugar art. Understanding their specific strengths and weaknesses allows you to make an informed decision and achieve better results in your culinary endeavors.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare professional regarding your dietary needs.

Comparison of Isomalt and Erythritol: What You Need to Know

  • Isomalt vs. Erythritol: While both are sugar alcohols, they are distinct compounds and are not the same.
  • Erythritol is Calorie-Free: With only ~0.2 calories per gram, erythritol is virtually zero-calorie because it's not metabolized by the body.
  • Isomalt is Reduced-Calorie: Isomalt has half the calories of sugar (~2 calories per gram) and is partially digested.
  • Erythritol is Easily Digested: It is highly tolerable and less likely to cause digestive upset compared to isomalt.
  • Isomalt is Ideal for Candies: Its low hygroscopicity and structural stability make it the superior choice for hard candies and sugar sculptures.
  • Erythritol has a Cooling Effect: This sensation is a notable characteristic that can be an advantage or disadvantage depending on the recipe.
  • Isomalt is Better for Sugar Art: For elaborate confectionery decorations, isomalt offers better results due to its low moisture absorption.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, you should not directly substitute erythritol for isomalt in hard candy recipes. Isomalt's unique resistance to moisture and its excellent structural properties are crucial for creating clear, stable hard candies, whereas erythritol may crystallize poorly and absorb moisture.

Erythritol is generally considered better for keto baking. It has a zero glycemic index and is virtually calorie-free, making it a reliable choice for those following a strict ketogenic diet. Isomalt has a low glycemic index but still contains some calories and is partially digested.

No, erythritol has a much better digestive tolerance than isomalt. Because erythritol is mostly absorbed before reaching the large intestine, it is less likely to cause gastrointestinal discomfort, bloating, or gas than isomalt.

Isomalt is derived from sucrose (beet sugar) through a multi-step manufacturing process. It is a processed ingredient, not a naturally occurring compound in its final form.

Both isomalt and erythritol are considered safe sugar substitutes when consumed in moderation. The main difference in side effects is related to digestive tolerance, with erythritol generally being gentler on the stomach.

Yes, isomalt and erythritol can be used together. Some recipes and products combine them to balance sweetness, mouthfeel, and to mitigate potential negative effects like erythritol's cooling sensation or the laxative effect of other polyols.

Yes, isomalt is a suitable sugar replacement for people with diabetes. Its low glycemic index means it causes a minimal increase in blood sugar levels, though it does have a slightly higher calorie and glycemic impact than erythritol.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.