Skip to content

Nutrition Diet: What is a good TDN value?

4 min read

According to agricultural extension services, high-quality hay for beef cattle is often defined as having a TDN value of 58% or greater. Determining what is a good TDN value, however, is not a fixed answer but is dependent on the specific livestock species, their stage of production, and the overall diet being formulated.

Quick Summary

Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) measures the energy available from feed for livestock, expressed as a percentage. The ideal TDN value varies significantly based on the animal's nutritional requirements, which change with its species and productive state. Higher TDN values indicate more energy-dense feed.

Key Points

  • Contextual Value: A good TDN value is not a fixed number; it is relative to the animal's species, age, and productive stage, such as a lactating cow versus a dry cow.

  • Forage Maturity is Key: The maturity of a forage is the most significant factor affecting its TDN value. Immature, leafy forages have higher TDN than older, more fibrous ones.

  • Higher TDN Equals More Energy: Feeds with higher TDN values are more energy-dense, providing more energy per pound of feed consumed.

  • Forage vs. Concentrate: Grains and concentrates (70-80% TDN) generally have higher TDN values than forages (45-65% TDN), but comparing different forage types requires careful analysis.

  • Supplementation Strategy: Knowing the TDN of your forage allows you to determine if and what type of supplementation is needed to meet an animal's energy requirements, which is crucial for profitability.

  • TDN vs. Net Energy: TDN is a useful, general measure of energy, whereas Net Energy (NE) provides a more precise and detailed breakdown of energy use, especially in high-performance animal diets.

  • Test Your Feed: Regularly testing your feed, especially forage, is essential to know its actual TDN value rather than relying on averages, which ensures accurate ration balancing.

In This Article

The Role of TDN in Animal Nutrition

Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) is a standard measure used in animal nutrition to estimate the energy content of a feedstuff or complete diet. It represents the sum of the digestible protein, digestible carbohydrates (crude fiber and nitrogen-free extract), and digestible fat multiplied by 2.25 to account for its higher energy density. This calculation provides a single, easy-to-understand figure for a feed's relative energy value, which is crucial for balancing livestock rations and predicting animal performance. A higher TDN value indicates a more energy-dense feed.

How to Interpret a Good TDN Value

The concept of a "good" TDN value is not universal and depends entirely on the animal's needs. The nutritional requirements of livestock, especially for ruminants like cattle, change dramatically depending on their stage of production—for example, a dry, pregnant cow has different energy needs than a high-producing lactating cow.

For example, a dry cow might only require a diet with a minimum of 48% TDN, whereas a lactating cow needs a diet with at least 60% TDN to support milk production. Therefore, a feed with 55% TDN could be considered "good" for a low-maintenance animal but insufficient for one with high energy demands.

To determine an appropriate TDN value, farmers and nutritionists reference detailed nutritional requirement tables, such as those published by the National Research Council (NRC) and cooperative extension services. For instance, excellent-quality legume hay should have a TDN of 64% or higher, while excellent grass hay may be 58% or higher. Grains and concentrates typically have much higher TDN values, often in the 70-80% range.

Factors Influencing a Feed's TDN Value

The TDN content of a feed is not static. Several factors can affect its value, making a forage analysis crucial for precise ration formulation. Key influencing factors include:

  • Maturity of the plant: As forage plants mature, their fiber content increases, while their overall digestibility decreases. This is a primary reason that early-bloom alfalfa has a higher TDN than mature alfalfa.
  • Feed processing: Methods such as grinding, pelleting, or chemical treatments can increase digestibility and nutrient availability, thereby increasing the TDN value.
  • Feed composition: The inherent nutrient profile plays a large role. Feeds rich in highly digestible carbohydrates and fats will have a higher TDN than those with high levels of indigestible fiber.
  • Animal species: Ruminants have different digestive capabilities than non-ruminants. The rumen's microbial population is highly efficient at breaking down fibrous material, influencing the overall digestibility of a feed.
  • Feeding frequency and level: How often and how much an animal is fed can impact digestion. Higher feed intake can lead to a more rapid passage rate through the digestive tract, potentially lowering nutrient digestibility.

TDN vs. Net Energy: A Comparative Analysis

While TDN has been a long-standing method for evaluating energy, modern nutrition often incorporates Net Energy (NE) systems, particularly for high-performance animals. It is important to understand the differences between these systems to make the most informed decisions.

Feature Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) Net Energy (NE)
Primary Function A simple, established estimate of energy content. A more precise, modern measure of energy utilization.
Calculation Sum of digestible protein, carbohydrates, and 2.25x digestible fat. Accounts for energy lost as urine, gas (methane), and heat (heat increment).
Accuracy Generally considered less precise, especially for high-concentrate rations. More accurate for predicting performance, particularly in high-producing dairy cows.
Energy Partitioning Does not differentiate between energy used for maintenance, growth, or lactation. Provides specific energy values for maintenance (NEm), growth (NEg), and lactation (NEl).
Applicability Useful for forage-based diets and beef cow rations. The preferred method for high-concentrate dairy cattle and intensive production systems.

Both systems have value, and for many beef cow rations primarily based on forage, TDN remains a perfectly acceptable and understandable metric. For more intensive operations, however, NE systems offer greater accuracy for maximizing efficiency. https://beef.unl.edu/learning/feedanalysis.shtml.

Practical Application: Balancing a Ration with TDN

When balancing a diet, the goal is to match the feed's energy content with the animal's needs. A farmer might combine different feeds to achieve a target TDN. For instance:

  1. Analyze existing forage: A hay test reveals that your grass hay is 52% TDN, which is sufficient for dry cows but not for lactating animals.
  2. Determine energy deficit: A lactating cow needs a diet closer to 60% TDN. This creates an 8% energy deficit.
  3. Choose a supplement: A grain mix with a TDN of 75% is selected to supplement the ration.
  4. Calculate the mix: By incorporating a certain amount of the high-TDN grain mix with the lower-TDN hay, the overall diet can be balanced to meet the energy demands of the lactating cows. This simple process highlights how TDN is a cornerstone for strategic supplementation and cost-effective livestock management.

Conclusion

Understanding what is a good TDN value is fundamental for effective livestock nutrition. The definition of a "good" value is entirely context-dependent, relying on the animal's species, age, and productive stage. Higher TDN values indicate greater energy density, but matching this energy to the animal's specific needs is key to preventing under- or overfeeding. While TDN is a useful and easy-to-understand metric, particularly for forage-heavy diets, advanced producers may also use Net Energy systems for more precise ration formulation. By regularly testing feeds and interpreting TDN in the context of their herd's requirements, producers can optimize animal health, performance, and overall operational profitability.

Frequently Asked Questions

TDN stands for Total Digestible Nutrients. It is a measure of the energy content of a feedstuff and represents the total of the digestible protein, crude fiber, nitrogen-free extract, and fat (with fat multiplied by 2.25).

While a high TDN value indicates a more energy-dense feed, it is not always better. The ideal TDN value depends on the animal's specific energy requirements. For example, a diet that is too energy-dense can lead to obesity in a dry cow, while a diet that is not energy-dense enough will limit milk production in a lactating cow.

As a forage plant matures, its TDN value decreases. This is because the proportion of highly digestible nutrients decreases while the indigestible fiber content (like lignin) increases. For this reason, hay harvested at an early bloom stage has a higher TDN than mature hay.

The most accurate way to find the TDN value of a feed, especially forages like hay, is to send a sample to a forage testing lab. They will perform a chemical analysis and provide a detailed report, which includes the TDN percentage.

TDN is a simpler, historical method of estimating energy, while Net Energy (NE) is a more modern and precise system. NE accounts for the energy lost through feces, urine, gas, and heat, providing separate values for energy used for maintenance, growth, and lactation.

TDN is most commonly used for ruminant diets, particularly those based on forage, like beef cattle. For poultry and monogastric animals, energy is often expressed in terms of Metabolizable Energy (ME). NE systems are often preferred for high-producing dairy cattle and intensive operations.

No, TDN only reflects the energy content of the feed. While the TDN calculation includes digestible protein, it does not assess whether the protein level is sufficient for the animal's needs. You must also analyze crude protein (CP) and mineral content separately.

Feed analysis is important because TDN values can vary widely based on factors like plant maturity, storage conditions, and processing. Relying on average TDN values can lead to inaccurate diet formulation, potentially impacting animal performance and profitability.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.