Skip to content

Nutrition Diet: What is Enteral vs Parenteral Nutrition?

4 min read

According to the American College of Gastroenterology, enteral nutrition is the preferred feeding method when the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is functional. Choosing between enteral vs parenteral nutrition depends entirely on a patient's medical condition and their digestive system's ability to function.

Quick Summary

This guide explains the fundamental differences between enteral and parenteral nutrition, outlining the administration routes, typical patient candidates, and the benefits and risks of each method. It clarifies which therapy is appropriate based on a person's digestive health and specific nutritional needs.

Key Points

  • Route of Administration: Enteral nutrition uses a tube into the GI tract, while parenteral nutrition is delivered intravenously through a vein.

  • Functional Gut: Enteral feeding requires a working digestive system, whereas parenteral nutrition is used when the GI tract is non-functional.

  • Risks and Costs: Parenteral nutrition carries a higher risk of infection and is more expensive than enteral nutrition.

  • Primary Indication: The decision between enteral vs. parenteral is based on the patient's digestive system's ability to function.

  • Immune Health: Enteral feeding helps maintain gut barrier function and immune health, a benefit not provided by bypassing the GI tract.

  • Total vs. Partial: Parenteral nutrition can be total (TPN) for complete support or partial (PPN) to supplement other feeding methods.

In This Article

What is Enteral vs Parenteral Nutrition?

Artificial nutrition is a life-sustaining treatment for patients who cannot consume enough calories or nutrients orally due to illness, injury, or a dysfunctional digestive system. The two primary methods are enteral nutrition (EN), which uses the gastrointestinal tract, and parenteral nutrition (PN), which delivers nutrients intravenously, bypassing the digestive system entirely. Understanding the distinction between these two methods is crucial for grasping their clinical applications and potential complications.

What is Enteral Nutrition?

Enteral nutrition, often called tube feeding, provides specially formulated liquid nutrition directly into the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is the preferred route whenever the patient's digestive system is accessible and working, even if they cannot chew, swallow, or consume enough food by mouth.

Common indications for enteral nutrition include:

  • Neurological conditions like stroke or multiple sclerosis that impair swallowing.
  • Cancers of the head, neck, or digestive tract.
  • Severe trauma or critical illness that prevents oral intake.
  • Failure to thrive in infants and children.

Types of enteral access devices:

  • Nasogastric (NG) Tube: Inserted through the nose and into the stomach for short-term use (4-6 weeks).
  • Nasojejunal (NJ) Tube: Inserted through the nose into the small intestine, used for patients with impaired stomach emptying or high aspiration risk.
  • Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube: A long-term tube placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall.
  • Jejunostomy (J-Tube): Placed directly into the small intestine, often during abdominal surgery.

Benefits of enteral nutrition:

  • Lower risk of infection compared to PN.
  • More physiological, maintaining the gut's natural function and immune health.
  • Less expensive and less complicated to administer.

What is Parenteral Nutrition?

Parenteral nutrition, or intravenous feeding, delivers liquid nutrients directly into the bloodstream via a catheter placed in a vein. This method is necessary for patients whose digestive system is non-functional, needs complete rest, or is unable to absorb nutrients.

Parenteral nutrition is administered in two forms:

  • Partial Parenteral Nutrition (PPN): Provides some, but not all, of a patient's nutritional needs and is given via a peripheral vein, often for short-term supplemental feeding.
  • Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN): Provides all essential nutrients—carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals—and is administered via a central venous catheter for complete nutritional support.

Indications for parenteral nutrition include:

  • Intestinal failure or severe malabsorption issues (e.g., short bowel syndrome, severe Crohn's disease).
  • Prolonged periods without oral intake, such as after major abdominal surgery or in critically ill patients.
  • Severe pancreatitis or gastrointestinal obstruction.
  • Certain cancers and chemotherapy that severely impair digestion.

Comparison Table: Enteral vs. Parenteral Nutrition

Feature Enteral Nutrition (EN) Parenteral Nutrition (PN)
Administration Route Via a tube into the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (stomach or intestine). Via a catheter into a vein, bypassing the GI tract.
Digestive System Use Requires a functional, accessible GI tract. Used when the GI tract is non-functional or needs rest.
Associated Risks Aspiration pneumonia, tube blockages, diarrhea, GI issues, refeeding syndrome. Catheter-related sepsis, metabolic imbalances, blood clots, liver complications.
Cost Generally less expensive. Generally more expensive due to specialized preparation and monitoring.
Immune System Impact Helps preserve gut barrier function and immune health. Bypasses the gut, which can lead to gut atrophy and higher risk of infection.
Types of Nutrients Specialized liquid formulas containing balanced macro- and micronutrients. Compounded solutions containing glucose, amino acids, lipids, electrolytes, vitamins, and minerals.

The Clinical Decision-Making Process

For healthcare professionals, the decision to use EN or PN involves a careful evaluation of the patient's condition. The guiding principle is to use the gut if it works. A team of healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and dietitians, collaborate to determine the most appropriate and safest nutritional approach for each patient. Patients often begin with one method and may transition to another as their condition improves or changes. For example, a patient might receive PN temporarily to allow the gut to rest and heal after surgery, then transition to EN, and finally back to oral feeding. Early nutritional support, ideally with EN, is recommended in critically ill patients unless contraindicated, as it is associated with better outcomes.

Conclusion

While both enteral and parenteral nutrition are vital forms of nutritional support, they are distinct clinical interventions catering to different patient needs. Enteral feeding harnesses the natural function of a working digestive system and is generally safer and less costly. In contrast, parenteral nutrition is a necessary, life-saving measure for individuals with a compromised or non-functional gastrointestinal tract. By understanding what is enteral vs parenteral nutrition, patients and caregivers can better appreciate the complex considerations involved in providing appropriate and effective nutritional care. For more detailed clinical guidelines, consult authoritative resources like the American College of Gastroenterology at gi.org/topics/enteral-and-parenteral-nutrition/.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is the delivery route. Enteral nutrition uses a feeding tube to deliver nutrients into the stomach or small intestine, while parenteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly into the bloodstream via an intravenous (IV) catheter.

Enteral nutrition is used for patients who cannot eat enough or swallow safely but have a functional gastrointestinal tract. This includes conditions like neurological disorders, head and neck cancers, or critical illness.

Parenteral nutrition is necessary when a patient's digestive system is non-functional, unable to absorb nutrients, or requires complete rest. This can be due to conditions like intestinal obstruction, short bowel syndrome, or severe gastrointestinal disease.

Enteral nutrition is generally considered safer than parenteral nutrition. It carries a lower risk of infection and other complications, such as blood clots and metabolic imbalances, because it is less invasive.

Common risks of enteral nutrition include aspiration (food entering the lungs), diarrhea, constipation, and mechanical issues with the tube, such as blockages.

Parenteral nutrition carries more severe risks, including catheter-related bloodstream infections, blood clots, and metabolic complications like electrolyte imbalances and hyperglycemia.

Yes, some patients may receive a combination of both therapies, particularly when transitioning from one method to another, or if partial parenteral nutrition is needed to supplement inadequate enteral intake.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.