The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, or MUST, is a practical, five-step framework used by healthcare professionals to screen for and manage the risk of malnutrition in adults across various settings. The ultimate goal is to improve patient outcomes by enabling early identification and intervention. Its standardized approach ensures consistent assessment of a patient's nutritional status.
How the MUST Score is Calculated
Calculating a MUST score is a straightforward process completed by care staff. The overall score is the sum of points from three components.
- Measure BMI Score: Calculate BMI (weight in kg / height in m²) and assign a score: >20 (>30 for obese) scores 0, 18.5-20 scores 1, and <18.5 scores 2.
- Assess Weight Loss Score: Score unplanned weight loss over 3-6 months: <5% is 0, 5-10% is 1, and >10% is 2.
- Establish Acute Disease Effect Score: If acutely ill with little to no nutritional intake for >5 days, score 2; otherwise, score 0.
- Calculate the Total Score: Sum scores from steps 1-3.
- Develop a Management Plan: Implement a plan based on the total score, e.g., routine monitoring for low risk or dietitian referral for high risk.
Interpreting the MUST Score
The total score categorizes nutritional risk and guides intervention.
- Score 0: Low Risk. Routine care and periodic rescreening.
- Score 1: Medium Risk. Monitor intake; if inadequate, advise on increasing intake.
- Score 2 or More: High Risk. Urgent nutritional support and dietitian referral.
Benefits and Limitations of the MUST Score
The MUST tool offers several benefits, such as simplicity, speed, and enabling early intervention. It has universal applicability and accurately predicts adverse outcomes. However, its limitations include a reliance on proper training, a focus primarily on existing malnutrition rather than development risk, and potential underestimation in certain chronic conditions.
Comparison of Nutritional Screening Tools
The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) focuses on identifying malnutrition risk and obesity in all adults using BMI, unintentional weight loss, and the effect of acute disease. In contrast, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is more detailed, often used in cancer patients, and includes weight history, food intake, nutritional impact symptoms, and function. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF) is designed for older adults and considers BMI, weight loss, reduced food intake, psychological stress, mobility, and acute disease.
Conclusion: The Role of MUST in Modern Healthcare
Understanding what is the purpose of a MUST score? highlights its critical function as an evidence-based tool for early detection and management of nutritional risk in adults. It helps to prevent negative health outcomes and improve patient recovery. MUST promotes appropriate nutritional care and resource allocation. By using this tool, healthcare providers ensure nutritional concerns are addressed with timely interventions, making MUST a cornerstone of proactive nutritional care.
For more detailed information and resources on using the MUST tool, refer to the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN).