Skip to content

Nutrition Diet: What is used to measure proteins in food and supplements?

4 min read

According to the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), accurately determining protein content is vital for proper labeling and assessing nutritional value. A range of specialized methods, from classic chemical analyses to modern quality scoring systems, are used to measure proteins and their nutritional impact.

Quick Summary

This article outlines the various scientific and nutritional methods for determining protein quantity and quality in food. It covers nitrogen-based techniques like Kjeldahl and Dumas, colorimetric assays, and advanced quality scores like DIAAS, explaining their principles and applications.

Key Points

  • Nitrogen-based measurement: Traditional methods like Kjeldahl and modern ones like Dumas determine crude protein by measuring total nitrogen and multiplying by a conversion factor.

  • Inaccuracy of crude protein: Both Kjeldahl and Dumas methods can overestimate protein content because they measure all nitrogenous compounds, not just true protein.

  • Spectrophotometric assays: BCA and Bradford assays are common for quantifying protein concentration in laboratory solutions by measuring a color change, but they are not used for assessing protein quality.

  • Protein quality matters: For nutritional purposes, protein quality is crucial, defined by the essential amino acid profile and digestibility, not just the total amount.

  • DIAAS is the gold standard: The Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) is the most accurate method for assessing protein quality, considering the digestibility of individual amino acids.

  • Method choice depends on purpose: The best method for measuring protein depends on the specific goal, balancing factors like speed, cost, and whether you need quantity, concentration, or nutritional quality data.

In This Article

Understanding Protein Measurement in the Context of a Nutrition Diet

For anyone focusing on a nutrition diet, the protein content of food is a crucial metric. However, simply looking at the number on a nutrition label doesn't tell the whole story. The methods used to arrive at that figure are complex and vary depending on whether the goal is to determine total quantity or assess nutritional quality. For decades, the gold standard involved measuring a food's nitrogen content, but modern science has developed more accurate and rapid techniques, as well as scoring systems that evaluate a protein's biological value to the human body. Understanding these methods helps consumers and professionals alike make more informed dietary choices.

Measuring Protein Quantity: Nitrogen-Based Methods

These methods are commonly used to determine total protein in a food sample by measuring its nitrogen content. Proteins contain nitrogen, and by measuring the total nitrogen, protein content can be estimated using a conversion factor.

The Kjeldahl Method

Introduced in 1883, the Kjeldahl method was a long-standing standard for protein analysis. It's a three-step wet-chemistry process: digestion to convert nitrogen to ammonium sulfate, distillation to release ammonia gas, and titration to quantify nitrogen. The nitrogen measurement is then converted to "crude protein" using a factor, typically 6.25. This method can overestimate true protein as it includes non-protein nitrogen compounds.

The Dumas Method

The Dumas method is a faster and more automated alternative to Kjeldahl. It involves combusting a sample at high temperatures to convert nitrogen into nitrogen gas, which is then measured. Like Kjeldahl, it uses a conversion factor to estimate protein and also measures non-protein nitrogen.

Measuring Protein Quantity: Spectrophotometric Assays

These methods are often used in research and clinical settings for liquid samples, relying on color changes proportional to protein concentration.

  • Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) Assay: Based on the Biuret reaction, this assay produces a purple color when proteins react with a reagent containing copper ions.
  • Bradford Assay: This method uses Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye that binds to basic amino acids in proteins, causing a color shift to blue quantifiable at 595 nm.
  • Lowry Assay: A sensitive but more complex method combining the Biuret reaction and a reduction process, resulting in an intense blue color.
  • Direct UV Absorbance at 280 nm: A quick method measuring UV light absorption by aromatic amino acids. It's best for pure protein samples due to interference risks.

Measuring Protein Quality: The Amino Acid Score

For a nutrition diet, the quality of protein, determined by its essential amino acid profile and how well it's digested and absorbed, is crucial.

Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS)

Recommended by the FAO in 2013, DIAAS is the leading method for assessing protein quality. It improves on older methods by measuring digestibility at the ileum and focusing on individual amino acid digestibility. DIAAS provides a percentage score by comparing a food protein's digestible essential amino acids to a reference pattern based on human needs. Higher DIAAS scores indicate better quality.

Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS)

Previously used for labeling, PDCAAS corrected amino acid scores based on fecal digestibility. However, it's being replaced by DIAAS due to limitations in accurately measuring digestibility and truncating scores.

Comparison of Key Protein Measurement Methods

Feature Kjeldahl Method Dumas Method Spectrophotometric Assays (e.g., Bradford, BCA) DIAAS (for quality)
Principle Measures nitrogen content after acid digestion. Measures nitrogen gas after high-temperature combustion. Color change produced by chemical reaction with protein. Compares ileal digestible amino acids to reference needs.
Measures Crude protein (total nitrogen). Crude protein (total nitrogen). Total protein concentration in a solution. Protein quality based on digestibility and amino acid profile.
Accuracy High precision, but can overestimate true protein due to non-protein nitrogen. High precision, but can overestimate true protein due to non-protein nitrogen. Variable depending on protein type and presence of interfering substances. Most accurate score for human protein quality.
Speed Slow, labor-intensive. Fast, automated (minutes per sample). Fast, minutes per assay, but requires sample preparation. Requires complex, time-consuming animal or human trials for digestibility.
Cost Moderate equipment cost, high running costs for hazardous chemicals. High initial equipment cost, low running costs. Low, relatively inexpensive reagents and equipment. High due to extensive in vivo testing and analysis.
Safety Requires hazardous chemicals and high temperatures. Safer, does not use toxic reagents. Generally safe, depending on reagents used. Primarily a calculation, but based on data from in vivo testing.

A Practical Overview of the Measurement Process

Determining a nutritional profile for protein involves several steps. Sample preparation ensures a uniform sample. Initial analysis often uses the Dumas method for a crude protein value. For quality, amino acid profiling is done using techniques like HPLC. Digestibility testing, often in humans or pigs, is necessary for DIAAS calculation. Finally, this data is combined to provide a complete picture of protein quality.

Conclusion

Protein values on food labels typically reflect nitrogen-based measurements, giving a crude protein figure. However, understanding protein quality through systems like DIAAS is vital for a comprehensive nutrition diet, especially with diverse dietary needs. The choice of method depends on the specific requirement, balancing factors like speed, cost, and necessary detail. Understanding these methods provides insight into the science behind dietary protein intake. The National Center for Biotechnology Information website (NCBI) offers further information on protein measurement.

Frequently Asked Questions

Proteins are composed of amino acids, which all contain nitrogen. By measuring the total nitrogen in a food sample, scientists can estimate the overall protein content using a general conversion factor, although this includes non-protein nitrogen.

Both measure total nitrogen, but the Kjeldahl method uses a wet-chemistry process involving acid digestion and titration, which is slow and uses hazardous chemicals. The Dumas method uses high-temperature combustion and is much faster, more automated, and safer.

The DIAAS is a scoring system used to measure protein quality based on the digestibility of individual essential amino acids. It is considered more accurate than previous methods like PDCAAS because it measures absorption at the end of the small intestine.

Protein quality is important because the body needs a balance of all nine essential amino acids to build and repair tissues. A high-quality protein provides these essential amino acids in proportions that match the body's needs.

No, reliable protein measurement requires specialized laboratory equipment and procedures, including chemical analysis or advanced chromatography. The methods described, such as Kjeldahl and Dumas, are not suitable for home use.

Colorimetric assays work by causing a chemical reaction that produces a color change when a reagent binds to proteins. The intensity of the color is directly proportional to the protein concentration and is measured using a spectrophotometer.

The primary limitation is that both Kjeldahl and Dumas measure all forms of nitrogen, including non-protein sources like free amino acids and nitrates. This can lead to an overestimation of the true protein content of a food.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.