Skip to content

Spelt vs. Kamut: Which Is Better for Your Health and Kitchen?

4 min read

An estimated 96% of the world’s grain crop is composed of modern wheat, but a growing number of people are rediscovering ancient varieties like spelt and Kamut, or Khorasan wheat, for their health benefits. Determining which is better, spelt or Kamut, depends on your specific dietary goals and culinary preferences.

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of spelt and Kamut, highlighting their differences in flavor, nutritional content, and ideal culinary applications for informed food choices.

Key Points

  • Nutrient Superiority: Kamut often contains higher levels of protein, selenium, zinc, and vitamin E compared to spelt.

  • Flavor Profile: Spelt is known for a nutty and slightly sweet taste, while Kamut offers a distinct buttery flavor.

  • Best for Baking: Spelt flour is ideal for tender baked goods like muffins and cookies due to its delicate gluten structure.

  • Best for Hearty Dishes: Kamut's large, firm kernels are perfect for making pasta, grain salads, and hearty stews.

  • Digestibility Note: Some people with mild wheat sensitivities may find both grains easier to digest than modern wheat, but neither is gluten-free.

  • Trademarked: 'Kamut' is the registered trademark for Khorasan wheat, a specific variety of ancient grain.

  • Culinary Versatility: While both are versatile, spelt excels in softer bakes and Kamut shines in applications requiring a firm, chewy texture.

In This Article

Spelt vs. Kamut: An Introduction to Ancient Grains

In recent years, the renewed interest in ancient grains has brought many varieties back to the forefront of healthy eating and home cooking. Spelt (Triticum spelta) and Kamut®, a trademarked name for Khorasan wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. turanicum), are two ancient wheat varieties that have gained significant popularity. Though both are known for being less processed and more nutrient-dense than modern wheat, they offer distinct profiles that can affect everything from a recipe's outcome to your body's digestion.

Nutritional Comparison

While both grains are excellent sources of energy and nutrition, a closer look reveals some key differences:

  • Protein: Kamut® generally has a higher protein content than spelt. Some sources suggest Kamut® contains up to 30% more protein than common wheat, placing it ahead of spelt in this category.
  • Vitamins and Minerals: Kamut® stands out with higher levels of several key nutrients. It contains significantly more vitamin E, selenium, zinc, and magnesium compared to both spelt and modern wheat varieties. Spelt, however, is a good source of manganese and phosphorus.
  • Essential Fatty Acids: Kamut® contains higher levels of major fatty acids, including beneficial omega-3s, which contribute to its anti-inflammatory properties.
  • Fiber: Both grains are rich in dietary fiber, crucial for digestive health. A study comparing ancient and modern wheat species noted that spelt had a higher fiber content in whole grain form compared to some other ancient varieties.

Taste and Texture

The culinary experience with spelt and Kamut® is quite distinct due to their unique flavor and texture profiles.

  • Spelt: Known for its nutty and slightly sweet flavor, spelt flour adds a delicious depth to baked goods. When cooked as a whole grain, it has a pleasant, chewy texture.
  • Kamut®: This grain is often described as having a mild, almost buttery, and nutty taste. Its large, blonde kernels give it a distinct appearance and a firm, chewy texture when cooked, making it excellent for pastas and grain salads.

Culinary Applications

The differences in taste and gluten structure make these ancient grains suitable for different culinary purposes.

  • Spelt: Because its gluten is more soluble and brittle than modern wheat, spelt flour is excellent for soft and tender baked goods like muffins, pancakes, waffles, and cookies. It can be used for yeast breads but may require mixing with other flours to prevent a crumbly result. As a whole grain, it works well in hot cereals, pilafs, or as a bed for roasted vegetables.
  • Kamut®: The firm, plump kernels of Kamut® make it an ideal choice for pasta, which holds its shape and chewy texture beautifully. Kamut® flour is highly versatile and can be used in breads, cookies, and other baked goods, often lending a richer flavor. It also makes a robust, full-bodied grain for salads, soups, and stews.

Gluten and Digestibility

For many, the debate over spelt and Kamut® is rooted in gluten and digestibility. It is crucial to understand that neither grain is gluten-free, and they are not safe for individuals with celiac disease. However, some people with non-celiac wheat sensitivity or IBS report better tolerance to these ancient grains compared to modern wheat.

Spelt's gluten structure is more water-soluble and brittle, which is thought to be a reason some people with minor sensitivities may tolerate it better. The non-hybridized nature of both spelt and Khorasan wheat means their genetic makeup is less complex than modern wheat, which has been extensively bred for high gluten content.

Spelt vs. Kamut Comparison Table

Feature Spelt Kamut (Khorasan Wheat)
Flavor Nutty, slightly sweet Mild, buttery, nutty
Texture Chewy when cooked; tender in baked goods Firm, large kernels, chewy
Protein High Very High (up to 30% more than modern wheat)
Fiber High High
Minerals Magnesium, phosphorus, manganese Selenium, zinc, magnesium, iron
Vitamin E Present Significantly higher
Key Fats Present Higher levels of essential fatty acids
Best Culinary Uses Muffins, pancakes, cookies, waffles, pilafs Pasta, breads, grain salads, pilafs, soups
Digestibility Easier for some with wheat sensitivity Possibly easier for some with wheat sensitivity
Gluten Contains gluten; different structure than modern wheat Contains gluten; different structure than modern wheat

Choosing the Right Grain for You

The best choice between spelt and Kamut depends on what you value most. If you're seeking a grain for making soft baked goods with a sweet, nutty flavor, spelt is an excellent option. For those who prioritize a higher protein and mineral content, a buttery taste, and applications like pasta or hearty grain salads, Kamut® is the clear winner.

  • For baking: Spelt is a fantastic 1:1 substitute for modern wheat in many recipes, particularly for softer items. Kamut® also works well, often adding a richer, more buttery flavor profile.
  • For maximum nutrition: Kamut® edges out spelt with its higher concentration of protein, vitamin E, selenium, and essential fatty acids.
  • For digestive ease: Both grains may be better tolerated by some individuals with mild wheat sensitivity, but this is highly individual and not a substitute for medical advice.

Ultimately, adding either of these ancient grains to your diet can diversify your nutrient intake and introduce new flavors and textures to your cooking. The choice is a matter of personal preference and intended use. Consider trying both to discover your favorite!

Conclusion

While both spelt and Kamut® are ancient wheat varieties that offer superior nutritional profiles compared to heavily processed modern wheat, they are not identical. Kamut® boasts higher protein and mineral levels, with a distinct buttery flavor and firm texture ideal for pasta and robust dishes. Spelt provides a sweet, nutty flavor and a tender texture perfect for cookies and other baked goods. The question of 'which is better' is personal, but informed by understanding their individual strengths. Both grains are valuable additions to a whole-foods diet, enhancing flavor and nutritional variety.

Nutritional and functional added value of oat, Kamut, spelt, rye and buckwheat versus common wheat in breadmaking

Frequently Asked Questions

No, both spelt and Kamut are ancient wheat varieties and contain gluten. They are not safe for people with celiac disease, though some individuals with non-celiac wheat sensitivity may tolerate them better than modern wheat due to their different gluten structure.

Kamut (Khorasan wheat) typically has a higher protein content than spelt, with some analyses suggesting it contains significantly more protein than common wheat.

While both can often be substituted for regular wheat flour, their different flavor profiles and gluten properties mean the results will vary. Spelt produces more tender baked goods, whereas Kamut can offer a richer, buttery flavor.

Some individuals with mild wheat sensitivities may find ancient grains like spelt and Kamut easier to digest. This is often attributed to their different gluten composition and the fact they have not been hybridized for high gluten content like modern wheat.

Spelt has a sweet and nutty flavor, while Kamut is known for a milder, buttery, and nutty taste.

While both can be used for bread, Kamut tends to produce a less crumbly loaf with a rich flavor, often holding its structure well. Spelt bread can sometimes be more delicate and may require other flours for better structure.

Kamut® is generally considered to be higher in important minerals such as selenium, zinc, and magnesium compared to spelt.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.