Tag: Brut vs extra dry

An average 5-ounce glass of Prosecco typically contains fewer calories than a standard glass of champagne. This makes many wonder: is Prosecco less fattening than champagne? The answer lies in key differences related to alcohol and sugar content, which directly impact the final calorie count.

Contrary to what the name suggests, Extra Dry champagne is actually sweeter than Brut. This surprising fact often leads to confusion for consumers, who assume a drier name indicates a lower sugar content. The reality is that Extra Dry champagne is a medium-dry option, positioned in the middle of the Champagne sweetness scale, not at the extremely dry end.

With a standard 750ml bottle containing between 495 and 600 calories, the calorie count in a 375ml half bottle of Prosecco can vary significantly depending on its sweetness level. Knowing this range is crucial for those monitoring their intake, as the amount of residual sugar plays a vital role in determining the final figure.

Extra Dry Champagne contains between 12 and 17 grams of sugar per liter, a level that is actually sweeter than its more famous counterpart, Brut. This seemingly counterintuitive fact is a common source of confusion for many wine drinkers, but understanding this key detail is essential for choosing the right bottle for your palate.

While a 125ml glass of average Prosecco and Champagne can have similar calorie counts—around 86 calories—the assumption that one is inherently 'more fattening' is a myth. The ultimate difference in calorie content, and therefore its impact on your diet, depends far more on the wine's specific dryness level than on its type.