Tag: Corporate control

Since 1996, the global area of land under cultivation with genetically engineered crops has increased dramatically. However, this rapid growth has been accompanied by significant concerns surrounding GMOs, particularly regarding their long-term effects on human health, the environment, and the global food system.

In the United States, over 90% of some crops like corn, soy, and canola are bioengineered. Despite their prevalence, concerns persist over whether bioengineered food products pose hidden dangers to human health, the environment, and social equity.

While often debated for health impacts, the USDA reports that over 90% of US corn, cotton, and soy come from GMO seeds. This reality prompts a deeper question: what is the real problem with GMO foods, beyond popular misconceptions?

According to a 2021 investigation by *The Guardian*, for 85% of groceries analyzed across the United States, four firms or fewer controlled more than 40% of the market share. This stark statistic reveals a market where consumer choice is heavily concentrated among a small number of powerful companies.

Over 90% of maize, cotton, and soy grown in the U.S. are from genetically modified seeds, according to the USDA. This prevalence raises important questions, prompting a closer look at why shouldn't we use GMO foods and the potential health, environmental, and ethical concerns associated with them.

Over 80% of corn and soybeans grown in the United States are genetically modified, but despite widespread adoption, significant opposition remains based on potential health risks, environmental damage, and ethical concerns. This opposition raises crucial questions for consumers, policymakers, and farmers regarding the long-term impact of genetic modification on our food supply and ecosystem.

The first genetically modified organism was created by biochemists Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen in 1973. However, pinpointing who is responsible for GMOs today is a far more complex issue, involving a web of diverse stakeholders and interests across the globe.

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a staple in global agriculture since the 1990s, yet concerns about their safety and effects have not subsided. For consumers, understanding why they shouldn't use genetically modified foods requires a look beyond marketing claims to the potential risks involved.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), global cultivation of GM crops has expanded rapidly since 1996, but this surge has not come without significant controversy. As biotechnology reshapes our food systems, critical questions arise about the long-term consequences. This article explores why should we stop GMO production, focusing on the potential for health hazards, ecological harm, and the ethical implications of a corporatized food chain.

According to the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM), animal studies have indicated serious health risks linked to genetically modified (GM) foods, which raises a critical question for public health advocates: **Why should the US ban GMO foods?**. The controversy surrounding GMOs extends beyond simple health concerns, touching on broader environmental and socio-economic issues that warrant consideration for a potential ban.