Tag: En vs pn

Studies show that critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN) often have a lower risk of infection, better immune function, and reduced duration of stay compared to those on parenteral nutrition (PN). This preference is rooted in significant clinical advantages that benefit patient recovery.

According to clinical studies, enteral nutrition (EN) is generally the first-line treatment for nutritional support due to its lower risk of infection and cost when compared to parenteral nutrition (PN). This key distinction is just one of many that define the medical choice between these two feeding methods.

According to major clinical guidelines from organizations like ESPEN and ASPEN, enteral nutrition (EN) is the preferred route for feeding critically ill patients who have a functional gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This preference is based on numerous findings that highlight the significant advantages of EN over PN, impacting patient safety, physiological function, and overall clinical outcomes.