Tag: Metabolic effects

According to the American Heart Association, most adults consume more than double their recommended daily sugar intake. This frequent overconsumption raises a common question: what happens if you have too much cake? The answer involves a complex cascade of effects on your body, from immediate discomfort to long-term health risks.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the use of non-sugar sweeteners has shown no significant long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children. While often promoted for weight management, many sugar substitutes come with a range of lesser-known health drawbacks that users should be aware of.

The World Health Organization's 2023 guideline recommends against using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control due to potential undesirable long-term effects, prompting many to question: Is it bad to have sucralose every day?. Understanding the full picture requires examining conflicting research, from regulatory body approvals to recent studies raising significant concerns.

In a recent study published in *Frontiers in Nutrition*, researchers found that the artificial sweetener neotame can damage the intestinal wall and promote pathogenic changes in gut bacteria. So, what does neotame do to your body and are the once-presumed benefits being overshadowed by newly discovered risks?

In 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a guideline advising against using non-sugar sweeteners like Splenda for long-term weight control. This statement challenges the common perception that artificial sweeteners are a universally superior alternative, forcing many to re-evaluate: is Splenda really healthier than sugar?

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently advised against the long-term use of non-sugar sweeteners like those found in Canderel, citing potential health risks. This has led many to question what are the side effects of Canderel sweetener and how its ingredients might impact health.

Recent in-vitro research on mouse testicular cell lines showed that exposure to sucralose significantly disrupted autophagic flux by impairing the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes. This critical finding adds to the growing body of evidence questioning the purported safety of sucralose and highlights its potential for inhibiting autophagy and causing other adverse cellular effects.

According to a 2022 study in *Microorganisms*, a 10-week sucralose consumption period was linked to alterations in the gut microbiome and insulin levels in healthy adults, highlighting the complex and debated physiological effects of this popular artificial sweetener.

While fructose is often called 'fruit sugar' and is the sweetest natural carbohydrate, sucralose, a zero-calorie artificial sweetener, is hundreds of times more potent. This dramatic difference in sweetness is a key point when considering if sucralose is sweeter than fructose.

According to a 2023 guideline from the World Health Organization (WHO), non-sugar sweeteners should not be used as a means of achieving weight control or reducing the risk of noncommunicable diseases. This guidance reflects a growing body of evidence questioning the long-held assumption that calorie-free sweeteners are a harmless alternative to sugar. Instead, research suggests the physiological effects are far more complex.