Tag: Pseudoscience

While proponents describe the taste as smoother, softer, and purer, independent chemists confirm that all pure water is H2O and its structure is dynamic, not permanently alterable. Therefore, what does structured water taste like is a subjective experience often linked to perception rather than a verifiable change in the water's chemical composition.

A 2013 systematic review of the blood type diet found no scientific evidence to validate its claimed health benefits. This diet, though popular, is considered pseudoscience by the medical community, yet it still provides specific dietary recommendations for different blood types, including those with O-positive blood.

According to a 2025 survey, 87% of Gen Z and millennials use social media for health and nutrition advice, highlighting the critical need for media literacy in evaluating nutrition claims. Not all information is created equal, and many claims are designed to mislead rather than inform, posing risks to consumer health.

Medical science does not recognize the existence of 'mucoid plaque' as a physical substance that can be removed through fasting or other cleansing methods. This article explores why the concept of mucoid plaque is a myth and what genuine benefits fasting offers for gut health.

According to a 2013 systematic review published in the *American Journal of Clinical Nutrition*, there is no scientific evidence to support the claims of the blood type diet. This includes the specific, unproven theory regarding why shouldn't you eat corn with B+ blood, a claim rooted in the diet's pseudoscientific principles.

Despite claims of miraculous health benefits, scientific consensus and basic human physiology explain why Kangen water doesn't work as a 'cure-all'. The body's homeostatic mechanisms are far too robust for ionized water to significantly alter its pH balance.

According to a 2023 study by the International Food Information Council, a majority of consumers still find it difficult to navigate conflicting nutrition information online, highlighting the critical need to know how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable nutrition sources. This guide will help you develop the skills to spot misinformation and make informed decisions about your health.

The US diet industry is worth over $35 billion annually, a testament to the effectiveness of marketing tactics used to promote short-term weight loss solutions. This massive industry successfully captures consumer interest by deploying a sophisticated playbook that defines how are fad diets promoted, often prioritizing profit over sustainable, evidence-based nutrition.

The term "fad diet" is derived from the 16th-century word "fiddle-faddle," which means 'trivial' or 'nonsense'. This etymology perfectly encapsulates why they are called fad diets: they are short-lived, popular crazes that lack scientific backing and promise unrealistic results. They represent a short-term, unsustainable solution to a long-term health problem.

According to mainstream science, the organized molecular clusters in water, often called "structured" water, are extremely short-lived, with hydrogen bonds constantly breaking and reforming within a few hundred femtoseconds. This inherent molecular dynamic makes the claim of long-term structure maintenance highly contentious.