The Surprising Truth: MSG Was Never Banned
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is one of the most misunderstood ingredients in modern food history. Despite a pervasive myth, no major international food authority has ever mandated that MSG be taken off the market. The notion that MSG is dangerous and was banned is based on a decades-old campaign of misinformation, rather than sound scientific evidence. This culinary urban legend began in the late 1960s and, fueled by a single anecdote and flawed research, created a lasting stigma that continues to be debunked by current nutritional science.
The Genesis of a Myth: The 1968 Letter
In 1968, a letter was published in the New England Journal of Medicine by a doctor describing symptoms like numbness, weakness, and heart palpitations after eating at Chinese restaurants. The author, who used a pseudonym, speculated that a number of ingredients could be responsible, including salt, cooking wine, or MSG. The media and public seized on the MSG connection, creating the term “Chinese Restaurant Syndrome” (CRS). This sparked decades of negative publicity, leading many restaurants to prominently display “No MSG” signs to placate concerned customers. The term itself is now recognized as offensive and misleading, rooted in xenophobic bias against East Asian cuisine.
Flawed Studies vs. Modern Science
In the wake of the initial media frenzy, some early studies were conducted to investigate MSG's effects. These experiments were later criticized for their methodological flaws, which included administering unrealistically large doses of MSG directly to test subjects on an empty stomach. Modern, well-controlled, double-blind studies have failed to reproduce these adverse effects consistently. Regulatory bodies worldwide, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), have classified MSG as “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) when consumed at typical levels.
A Comparison of MSG Myths vs. Facts
To understand the true nature of MSG, it's helpful to compare the popular myths with scientific facts.
| Feature | Myth | Fact |
|---|---|---|
| Market Status | Was banned for safety reasons. | Has never been banned by major health authorities like the FDA; it is approved as a safe food additive. |
| Cause of CRS | Solely responsible for headaches, flushing, and other symptoms. | Symptoms are rare, mild, and often inconsistent, and can be triggered by a wide range of factors, including the nocebo effect. |
| Chemical Nature | A harmful, artificial chemical. | The sodium salt of glutamic acid, an abundant, naturally occurring amino acid found in many common foods. |
| Impact on Health | Highly toxic and causes long-term health issues. | Consumed and metabolized by the body in the same way as naturally occurring glutamate, with no credible evidence of long-term harm at normal dietary levels. |
| Ubiquity | Only used in Chinese food. | Used widely in processed foods, canned soups, snack foods, salad dressings, and seasoning blends in Western diets. |
The Role of Naturally Occurring Glutamate in Your Diet
Part of the confusion surrounding MSG is that the glutamate in the additive is chemically identical to the glutamate found naturally in many whole foods. This amino acid is responsible for the savory, umami flavor that we find so delicious. Some foods with high levels of naturally occurring glutamate include:
- Cheeses: Parmesan and Roquefort
- Vegetables: Tomatoes, mushrooms, and peas
- Sauces and condiments: Soy sauce, miso, and ketchup
- Meats and seafood: Cured meats, fish sauce, and certain seafood
The human body metabolizes glutamate from all sources in the same manner. The average person consumes significantly more glutamate from these natural food sources daily than from added MSG.
The Takeaway for Your Diet
For most people, MSG is a harmless and effective tool for enhancing flavor. Its bad reputation was born from a period of misinformation and has persisted despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary. While a very small percentage of the population may report mild, short-lived sensitivities to very high doses of MSG consumed on an empty stomach, it is not a widespread or medically confirmed issue. The real nutritional concern for many people is not MSG itself, but rather the ultra-processed foods in which it is often found, which can be high in sodium, unhealthy fats, and refined ingredients. In fact, using MSG can actually help reduce overall sodium intake, as it contains only one-third the amount of sodium as table salt. By focusing on a balanced, whole-food-based nutrition diet, consumers can make informed choices based on facts, not fear. For more information, the FDA provides a comprehensive list of FAQs about MSG safety.
Source: FDA Questions and Answers on Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Conclusion
The enduring myth surrounding MSG serves as a powerful reminder of how misinformation, media hype, and cultural biases can influence public perception of food and nutrition. By understanding the origins of the MSG controversy and consulting reliable scientific and regulatory sources, individuals can confidently incorporate this flavor enhancer into their cooking. Ultimately, the question of 'why was MSG taken off the market?' is a non-starter because, for the vast majority of people, it was never a health threat, and it never left.