Importance of Specialized Nutrition
Adequate and timely nutrition is a cornerstone of very low birth weight (VLBW) infant care, aimed at promoting optimal growth and neurodevelopment while minimizing complications like necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Given their low nutrient stores and high metabolic demands, VLBW infants have unique nutritional requirements that differ significantly from term babies. The feeding strategy evolves over time, starting with minimal enteral feeds and progressing toward full oral nutrition as the infant's gastrointestinal system matures.
Initial Approach: Parenteral and Trophic Feeding
For the first few days of life, especially in infants born at the lowest birth weights, intravenous (parenteral) nutrition provides the primary source of fluids and nutrients. This is used as a critical adjunct to enteral feeding, not a replacement. Early initiation of minimal, or trophic, enteral feeds is recommended, typically within the first 24 hours of life, to stimulate gut development. Trophic feeds are small volumes of milk, approximately 10–15 mL/kg/day, and can be continued even during conditions like sepsis or respiratory distress, but should be withheld in cases of intestinal obstruction.
Milk of Choice
When establishing enteral feeding, the type of milk is critical. The clear hierarchy of choice is:
- First choice: The infant's own mother's expressed breast milk. Fresh milk is preferred over frozen due to better preservation of immune components.
- Second choice: Donor human milk, which offers benefits similar to mother's milk, such as reduced NEC risk, especially when combined with human milk-based fortifiers.
- Third choice: Preterm infant formula, used when human milk is unavailable or insufficient.
Advancing Enteral Feeds
Once trophic feeding is tolerated, the volume of enteral feeds is slowly advanced. The rate of increase depends on the infant's weight and tolerance, with slower advancement for the smallest and most fragile infants. The goal is to reach full enteral feeding, typically 150–180 mL/kg/day, as quickly and safely as possible. Fast advancement protocols have been shown to be safe and may reduce the duration of parenteral nutrition.
Daily Feed Volume Advancement
- Infants <1 kg: Increase by 15–20 mL/kg/day.
- Infants ≥1 kg: Increase by 30 mL/kg/day.
Feed Delivery and Fortification
Most VLBW infants, especially in the early stages, require tube feeding via the oral-gastric route, which is often preferred over the nasal route. Intermittent bolus feeding is generally favored over continuous feeding, as it mimics natural feeding patterns and avoids the loss of lipids that can occur during continuous pump infusions. Non-nutritive sucking with a pacifier during gavage feeds can also help promote the maturation of feeding skills. Human milk is fortified with a multi-nutrient supplement once enteral intake reaches approximately 100 mL/kg/day to meet the high nutritional demands for growth. Fortifiers can be human milk-based or bovine-based, with the former potentially offering greater protection against NEC.
Monitoring Feed Tolerance and Transition to Oral Feeds
Monitoring for signs of feed intolerance is a constant task. Routine checking of gastric residual volume (GRV) and abdominal girth is no longer recommended as a primary assessment tool due to poor correlation with complications like NEC. Instead, monitoring should focus on clinical signs such as bile-stained vomit or hemorrhagic residuals. The transition to oral feeding is a gradual process that depends on the infant's corrected gestational age and demonstrated feeding skills.
Comparison of Feeding Methods
| Feature | Intermittent Bolus Feeding | Continuous Feeding |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery Method | Timed, larger volumes over a short period. | Slow, continuous infusion via pump. |
| Mimics | Natural, cyclical feeding pattern. | Constant, non-natural delivery. |
| Nutrient Loss | Minimal fat and calorie loss. | Can result in significant fat and nutrient loss due to tubing adherence. |
| Gut Motility | Promotes faster gastric emptying. | Slower gastric emptying. |
| Time to Full Feeds | Generally reaches full enteral feeds faster. | May prolong the time to reach full feeds. |
| Preferred use | Recommended for most VLBW infants. | Used as a last resort for managing severe GER. |
Common Challenges and Solutions
Challenges like feed intolerance and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) can arise. For infants on non-invasive ventilation (e.g., CPAP), feeding must be managed cautiously as it can cause abdominal distension. For suspected GER, positional changes (left lateral and prone after feeds) are often more effective and safer than feed thickeners, which can increase the risk of NEC. In all cases, a personalized feeding plan developed in consultation with the medical team is paramount.
Conclusion
Feeding very low birth weight infants is a complex process requiring a systematic and evidence-based approach. The primary goals are to provide adequate nutrition to support growth, mature the gut, and prevent complications like NEC. Key strategies involve prioritizing human milk, advancing enteral feeds cautiously, fortifying milk to meet high metabolic demands, and closely monitoring for signs of intolerance rather than relying on unreliable indicators like routine gastric residuals. Adherence to these specialized guidelines is essential for optimizing the long-term health and developmental outcomes of VLBW infants. For more detailed clinical recommendations, refer to the WHO guidelines on feeding VLBW infants.