Skip to content

What is healthier, Milo or Ovaltine?

4 min read

Originally sold in pharmacies as a nutritional supplement for malnourished children, Ovaltine has a history rooted in health, while Milo was promoted to fuel athletes. Choosing whether Milo or Ovaltine is healthier today requires a detailed look at their modern formulations, focusing on key nutritional differences beyond marketing.

Quick Summary

A nutritional comparison of Milo and Ovaltine explores key differences in their sugar, fat, and vitamin content, helping consumers determine which malted beverage best aligns with their health goals.

Key Points

  • Sugar Content: Milo often contains less sugar per serving than Ovaltine, although this can vary significantly depending on the regional formula.

  • Fat and Calories: Ovaltine is generally lower in fat and calories compared to Milo per serving, making it the lighter option in that regard.

  • Vitamin Fortification: Both beverages are fortified with essential vitamins and minerals, with Ovaltine often featuring more Vitamin A and calcium, while Milo emphasizes iron and B vitamins.

  • Taste Profile: Milo has a richer, more chocolatey taste, whereas Ovaltine is characterized by a creamier, more dominant malty flavor.

  • Context is Key: The true health impact of either drink is determined by serving size, frequency of consumption, and what it is mixed with, rather than just the powder's properties.

  • Read the Label: Due to regional variations in manufacturing, always check the specific nutrition label on the product you buy for the most accurate information.

In This Article

Milo vs. Ovaltine: An In-Depth Nutritional Breakdown

When it comes to nostalgic childhood treats, few beverages spark as much debate as Milo and Ovaltine. Both are beloved malted chocolate drinks, but the question of which is healthier is more complex than a simple taste test. The answer lies in their specific nutritional content, which can vary significantly by region and formulation. While both offer fortification with vitamins and minerals, they also contain substantial amounts of sugar, making moderation key for either choice.

The Sugar and Carbohydrate Battle

For many health-conscious consumers, sugar content is the most critical factor. Based on various formulations and serving sizes, Milo generally contains less sugar per serving than Ovaltine, making it the better option for those monitoring their sugar intake. For example, one source suggests a 30g serving of Milo contains 12.2g of sugar, while Ovaltine has 16.4g for the same serving size. However, another source suggests Ovaltine may have lower added sugars in certain formulations. The specific sugar content depends heavily on the product variation and the local market. Both contain significant carbohydrates, mainly from sugar and malt extract, which provides quick energy. This carbohydrate load is why both drinks are popular for an energy boost but also why they should be consumed in moderation.

Fat and Protein Profile

When examining the fat content, Ovaltine consistently comes out ahead with less fat per serving. One comparative study shows a 30g serving of Ovaltine has just 0.9g of fat, while Milo has 3.0g. This lower fat profile contributes to Ovaltine's lower calorie count per serving as well. In terms of protein, Milo tends to offer slightly more. The same comparative data indicates Milo contains 3.5g of protein per 30g serving, compared to Ovaltine's 2.0g. While neither is a high-protein supplement, this small difference could be relevant for those seeking a post-workout drink or a quick protein top-up, though whole foods are more effective.

Vitamin and Mineral Fortification

Both brands are known for their vitamin and mineral fortification, a legacy of their original purpose as nutritional aids. The specific blend of micronutrients, however, varies. Ovaltine is often highlighted for its high content of B vitamins, vitamin A, and calcium, especially when mixed with milk. Milo, too, is fortified with numerous vitamins and minerals, including iron, calcium, and B vitamins, particularly in formulations marketed toward children and athletes. The best choice depends on the specific micronutrients you are looking to supplement. For example, if you need more Vitamin A, Ovaltine may be the superior choice. If you are targeting more iron and B vitamins for energy, Milo might be your pick.

Ingredients and Flavor Profiles

The core ingredients for both include malted barley, milk powder, sugar, and cocoa. However, the ratios and additional ingredients shape their distinct flavor profiles. Milo is known for its more robust, chocolate-forward taste, often described as sweeter. Ovaltine, conversely, has a creamier, more pronounced malt flavor that some find less sweet. The differences in taste come down to personal preference, but they also reflect subtle variations in their recipes and ingredient quality.

Comparison Table: Milo vs. Ovaltine (Per 30g Serving)

Nutrient Milo Ovaltine
Energy 124 kcal 112 kcal
Protein 3.5 g 2.0 g
Carbohydrate 20.1 g 23.0 g
Sugar 12.2 g 16.4 g
Fat 3.0 g 0.9 g
Vitamins 9+ fortified 10+ fortified

Note: Nutritional values can vary by region and specific product formula. This data is based on a regional comparison study.

Making the Healthier Choice: A Holistic Approach

Ultimately, deciding which is healthier depends on your dietary priorities. For someone concerned about caloric intake and fat, Ovaltine might be the better option. If minimizing sugar is the main goal, Milo could be preferable, though it contains more fat. For those seeking maximum vitamin fortification, examining the specific product labels is essential, as the blends vary. The most important consideration, regardless of brand, is the added sugar content and how frequently it is consumed. Neither should replace a balanced diet, and both are best enjoyed as an occasional treat. For comprehensive nutritional information, it's wise to read the product label and consult reliable sources like the Healthline article on Ovaltine.

How to Maximize the Nutritional Benefits of Malt Drinks

Instead of focusing on which is inherently healthier, consider how to prepare and consume these drinks to minimize their downsides. Here are some tips:

  • Reduce Sugar: Use less powder per serving than recommended, or opt for low-sugar versions where available.
  • Choose the Right Mixer: Mixing with plain water or unsweetened milk alternatives can drastically reduce overall calories and sugar compared to full-fat milk.
  • Portion Control: Limit consumption to a single serving per day or a few times a week, treating it as a sweet indulgence rather than a core dietary item.
  • Balance with Whole Foods: Pair the drink with a nutritious meal to offset the sugar rush and ensure a balanced intake of nutrients.

Conclusion: Personal Preference and Mindful Consumption

While there are slight nutritional differences that may lean one way or the other, such as Ovaltine's lower fat and Milo's potentially lower sugar, neither can be declared an outright winner as the healthier option without context. Both are highly processed, sugar-laden products despite their vitamin fortification. The healthiest approach is to consume either beverage in moderation and as part of a balanced diet rich in whole foods. Your personal health goals, taste preferences, and willingness to control serving sizes are the true determinants of the better choice for you.

A Final Word on Formulations

It is crucial to be aware that the recipes for Milo and Ovaltine vary considerably depending on the country. Ingredients, fortification levels, and even taste can differ based on local regulations and consumer preferences. Always check the nutritional information on the packaging of the product you are purchasing to get the most accurate data for your decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Milo typically contains more protein per serving than Ovaltine. For a 30g serving, Milo offers 3.5g of protein, while Ovaltine provides 2.0g.

For weight management, Ovaltine is generally preferable due to its lower fat and calorie content per serving. However, the high added sugar in both products means moderation is crucial.

Both Milo and Ovaltine can contain trace amounts of caffeine, which is naturally present in cocoa. However, neither is a significant source of caffeine compared to coffee or tea.

While both are fortified with vitamins and minerals, their high sugar content means they should not be primary sources of nutrition for children. A balanced diet of whole foods is more important.

The calcium content is largely dependent on what the powder is mixed with, especially if milk is used. Both are fortified, but Ovaltine mixed with milk can provide a significant portion of the daily recommended intake.

Both drinks primarily contain a blend of malt extract, sugar, cocoa, and milk powder, though specific recipes and ingredient lists can vary by region.

Healthier alternatives include making your own homemade versions with less sugar, using unsweetened cocoa powder with milk, or simply sticking to water and whole foods for nutritional needs.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.