Skip to content

What Is More Fattening, Wine or Prosecco?

5 min read

A glass of Prosecco typically contains fewer calories than an average glass of still wine, often due to a lower alcohol content. However, the real answer to what is more fattening, wine or Prosecco, is more complex and depends largely on the specific type of drink and your serving size. Alcohol itself is a concentrated source of calories, a factor that heavily influences both beverages' impact on your waistline.

Quick Summary

The calorie count in wine versus Prosecco varies based on factors like alcohol by volume (ABV) and residual sugar. While Prosecco often has a lower calorie count per serving, specific types of dry wine can be comparable. The true "winner" depends on your choice of style and portion control.

Key Points

  • Alcohol Content is Key: The alcohol by volume (ABV) is the primary driver of calories in both wine and Prosecco, with each gram containing about 7 kcal.

  • Dry Prosecco is Often Lighter: A standard glass of Brut Prosecco typically has fewer calories than most glasses of still wine due to lower ABV.

  • Sugar Matters: The residual sugar content also adds calories. Beware of sweeter Prosecco styles like 'Extra Dry' or 'Dry,' which are higher in sugar than Brut.

  • Still Wine Varies Widely: Calorie counts in still wine differ significantly based on type. A dry Pinot Grigio can be low in calories, while a full-bodied red or sweet dessert wine is much higher.

  • Empty Calories Impact Weight: Alcohol provides empty calories that can slow down your body's fat-burning metabolism and lower inhibitions, leading to poor eating habits.

  • Portion Control is Crucial: Being mindful of serving size is essential, as even a moderately caloric drink can become fattening if consumed in large quantities.

In This Article

Wine vs. Prosecco: Understanding the Calorie Differences

When it comes to tracking calories, many people mistakenly believe that all wines are created equal. The perception of wine versus sparkling wine, particularly Prosecco, can be misleading. While Prosecco is frequently touted as a lighter option, the reality is nuanced. The caloric content is primarily dictated by two factors: the alcohol by volume (ABV) and the residual sugar left over after the fermentation process. A standard gram of alcohol contains approximately 7 calories, while a gram of sugar contains about 4 calories. Thus, a higher ABV or sweeter profile will inevitably lead to a higher calorie count, regardless of whether the drink is still or sparkling.

The Fermentation Process and Calorie Content

The way wine and Prosecco are made directly impacts their final caloric composition. In winemaking, yeast consumes the natural sugars in grapes and converts them into alcohol and carbon dioxide. In still wines, this process typically runs its course, with the final ABV and residual sugar levels varying based on the grape type and winemaking techniques. For example, a full-bodied red wine like Cabernet Sauvignon often has a higher ABV and therefore more calories than a lighter white like Pinot Grigio.

Prosecco is produced using the Charmat method, where the secondary fermentation that creates the signature bubbles occurs in large steel tanks. The fermentation can be halted earlier to produce a sweeter wine with more residual sugar, or allowed to continue for a drier, less sugary result. This is why you see different classifications on Prosecco labels, which are a key indicator of its sweetness and calorie count.

Deciphering Sweetness Levels and Labels

The labels on both wine and Prosecco provide crucial clues about their potential for being more fattening. For Prosecco, understanding the sweetness levels is essential for choosing a lower-calorie option:

  • Brut Nature: The driest and lowest in sugar, containing 0–3 grams per litre. This is your best bet for a minimal calorie count.
  • Extra Brut: Also very dry, with up to 6 grams of sugar per litre.
  • Brut: The most common style, containing up to 12 grams of sugar per litre, still considered dry.
  • Extra Dry: Confusingly, this is sweeter than Brut, with 12–17 grams of sugar per litre.
  • Dry: The sweetest of the common labels for Prosecco, with 17–32 grams of sugar per litre.

For still wines, sweetness isn't always explicitly stated on the front label, but you can infer from the wine type. Dry still wines typically have very little residual sugar, while sweet dessert wines are designed to be high in sugar and are thus more calorific.

Calorie Comparison: Wine vs. Prosecco

To make a clear comparison, let's look at average calorie counts for a standard 5-ounce (150ml) serving. The figures below are approximate and can vary by brand and specific vintage.

Drink Type Average ABV Approximate Calories (per 5 oz / 150ml)
Dry Prosecco (Brut) 11-12% ~90-100 kcal
Extra Dry Prosecco 11-12% ~120 kcal
Dry White Wine (e.g., Sauvignon Blanc) 9-13% ~100-120 kcal
Dry Red Wine (e.g., Pinot Noir) 11-13.5% ~115-140 kcal
Full-Bodied Red Wine (e.g., Malbec) 13.5-16% ~140-165 kcal
Sweet White Wine 9-12% ~150-180 kcal
Dessert Wine 14-21% ~160-230 kcal

As the table shows, a standard dry Prosecco is often one of the lowest-calorie alcoholic options available. However, a light, dry white wine like Pinot Grigio is a very close contender. A fuller-bodied red or a sweet wine will almost always be more fattening than even the sweetest Prosecco. The key takeaway is that both alcohol and sugar contribute, so you can't simply assume one category is always better than another.

How Alcohol Affects Weight Beyond Calories

The term "fattening" encompasses more than just the raw calorie count. Alcohol contains "empty calories" that provide energy but no nutritional value. Your body prioritizes processing alcohol as a toxin, meaning it will burn the alcohol for energy first before it can effectively metabolize fats and carbohydrates from other food sources. This can temporarily slow down your metabolism, making it more likely that excess energy from food is stored as fat.

Furthermore, consuming alcohol can lower inhibitions and stimulate appetite, leading to poorer food choices and overeating, especially of salty or fatty snacks. The sleep disruption caused by alcohol consumption can also negatively impact weight management. For individuals concerned with weight, considering these secondary effects is as important as counting the initial calories in the glass.

Making Healthier Choices

To manage your calorie intake while enjoying a drink, consider these tips:

  • Opt for Dry: Choose Brut or Extra Brut Prosecco. If you prefer still wine, select a dry white or a light-bodied red, as these typically have lower residual sugar.
  • Check the ABV: Look for wines with a lower alcohol percentage, ideally under 12%. The lower the ABV, the fewer alcohol-derived calories you are consuming.
  • Watch Your Portion: Always be mindful of serving sizes. A standard 5-ounce glass is a good guideline, but many home pours or restaurant servings are larger. Measuring your wine can help you stay on track.
  • Alternate with Water: Hydrating with water between glasses of wine or Prosecco helps slow your consumption and keeps you feeling fuller.
  • Pair Responsibly: Be conscious of the food you pair with your drinks. Avoid calorie-dense foods while drinking to prevent a double-dose of high-calorie intake.

Conclusion: The Bottom Line on Calories

Ultimately, neither wine nor Prosecco is inherently more fattening across the board. While a standard serving of a dry Prosecco will likely be the lowest-calorie option, a dry white wine with a similar ABV is a close second. The biggest culprits for high calories are high-ABV wines and those with higher residual sugar, including dessert wines. When deciding between wine and Prosecco, focus on the ABV and the sweetness level indicated on the label. A mindful approach to consumption, controlling portion sizes, and being aware of the empty calories in all alcoholic drinks are the best strategies for managing your weight and enjoying your favorite beverage. For more information on the impact of alcohol on weight, consult authoritative sources like Drinkaware for detailed guides.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, Prosecco does not always have fewer calories. While dry Prosecco (Brut) typically contains fewer calories than many still wines, some low-calorie, low-ABV still wines can be comparable. The specific alcohol and sugar content of each drink is the determining factor.

Alcohol contains 7 calories per gram, nearly double the calories per gram of carbohydrates. Therefore, wines or Proseccos with a higher alcohol by volume (ABV) will inherently have a higher calorie count.

Contrary to what the name suggests, Extra Dry Prosecco is sweeter and has more residual sugar than Brut Prosecco. For the lowest sugar and calorie content in a sparkling wine, choose a Brut or Extra Brut.

Not necessarily. While many lighter-bodied white wines are lower in calories, the color of the wine is not a reliable indicator. A full-bodied white wine with high ABV can have more calories than a light-bodied red wine with a lower ABV.

Alcohol can lead to weight gain by providing empty calories, slowing down your body's fat-burning process, and increasing your appetite and cravings for unhealthy food.

Yes, red wine drinkers can choose lighter-bodied varieties with lower ABV, such as Pinot Noir or Gamay, which are typically on the lower end of the red wine calorie spectrum.

For weight loss, the key is moderation and choosing options with lower alcohol and sugar content, regardless of whether it's sparkling or still. A dry Brut Prosecco is a good option, as are light, dry still wines with lower ABV.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.