What's Wrong With the Term 'Junk Food'? A Historical Perspective
The phrase "junk food" has been in use since at least the 1950s, first appearing in headlines to describe low-nutrient, high-calorie products predominantly made of white flour and refined sugar. In the 1970s, Michael F. Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest helped popularize the term to raise awareness about unhealthy foods. While the term is widely understood and carries a negative connotation, it lacks the scientific precision needed for public health discourse. Its informal nature means that what one person considers junk food, another may not, and it doesn't adequately explain why certain foods are detrimental to health.
The NOVA Classification: The Scientific Alternative
For nutritional science and public policy, the term "ultra-processed food" (UPF) is the correct and most widely accepted term for what is colloquially known as junk food. This classification comes from the NOVA system, developed by researchers in Brazil, which categorizes all foods into four groups based on the extent and purpose of industrial processing.
The Four NOVA Food Groups
-
Unprocessed or Minimally Processed Foods: These are whole foods in their natural state or with minimal alterations like drying, freezing, or pasteurization. They contain no added fats, salt, or sugar. Examples include fresh or frozen fruits, vegetables, eggs, milk, meat, and plain yogurt.
-
Processed Culinary Ingredients: Substances extracted from Group 1 foods or from nature for kitchen use, such as oils, butter, sugar, and salt.
-
Processed Foods: Simple products made by adding Group 2 ingredients to Group 1 foods to increase their durability or palatability. Examples include freshly baked bread (often artisanal), cheeses, and canned vegetables with added salt.
-
Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs): The most industrial category. These are complex formulations primarily made from substances extracted or derived from foods, with minimal whole ingredients. They typically contain additives not used in home cooking, such as flavors, emulsifiers, sweeteners, and preservatives.
What Makes Ultra-Processed Foods Problematic?
The health risks associated with UPFs are extensive and well-documented by epidemiological and controlled studies. The mechanisms through which they harm health go beyond simply being high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS). Researchers point to several key factors:
- Hyper-Palatability: UPFs are designed by food scientists to be highly rewarding and, in some cases, potentially addictive. The combination of refined carbohydrates and fats, often in precise ratios, creates a "supra-additive" effect on the brain's reward centers, encouraging overconsumption.
- Altered Food Matrix: Industrial processing can significantly change the physical structure of food. This can affect satiety signals, leading people to eat more before feeling full compared to a diet of minimally processed foods with similar caloric content.
- Additives and Ingredients: The cocktail of additives, from artificial sweeteners to emulsifiers, has been linked to negative health effects. Some studies suggest a link to inflammation and disruption of the gut microbiome, which affects metabolic health. Bisphenols and phthalates from plastic packaging are also a concern.
Health Consequences of a UPF-Rich Diet
High consumption of UPFs has been associated with a wide array of adverse health outcomes, including:
- Obesity: The high caloric density and low satiety potential of UPFs contribute significantly to weight gain and obesity.
- Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Frequent blood sugar spikes and chronic inflammation from UPFs contribute to insulin resistance and a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
- Cardiovascular Disease: The high content of unhealthy fats, sugar, and salt contributes to an increased risk of heart disease and stroke.
- Mental Health: Emerging research links UPF consumption to a higher risk of mental health conditions like depression and anxiety.
How to Reduce Your Intake of Ultra-Processed Foods
While completely eliminating UPFs can be challenging due to their convenience and prevalence, several strategies can help reduce your intake:
- Start Slowly: Begin by targeting just one or two common UPFs in your diet. For example, replace sugary cereals with plain oatmeal and fruit.
- Focus on Whole Foods: Prioritize unprocessed and minimally processed foods like fresh fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins when grocery shopping and meal planning.
- Cook at Home More Often: Preparing meals from scratch gives you complete control over ingredients, avoiding the hidden additives and excessive salt/sugar found in many packaged foods.
- Read Labels Carefully: Scrutinize ingredient lists for unrecognizable substances like hydrogenated oils, high-fructose corn syrup, emulsifiers, and artificial flavors. A long list of additives is a telltale sign of a UPF.
- Plan Ahead for Snacking: Have healthy snacks readily available to avoid reaching for packaged options. Think nuts, seeds, fresh fruit, or veggie sticks with hummus.
Comparison Table: Minimally Processed vs. Ultra-Processed Foods
| Feature | Minimally Processed Foods | Ultra-Processed Foods |
|---|---|---|
| Level of Processing | Simple alterations, like grinding or drying. | Extensive industrial processes involving extraction and synthesis. |
| Ingredient List | Short and recognizable ingredients; may have added simple items like salt. | Often includes many unfamiliar ingredients, additives, and preservatives. |
| Nutrient Density | High in essential vitamins, minerals, protein, and fiber. | Generally low in nutrients relative to calorie count; often contains empty calories. |
| Taste Profile | Natural, authentic flavors. | Engineered for hyper-palatability, often intensely sweet, salty, or fatty. |
| Satiety Effect | Higher satiety due to fiber and water content; promotes feeling full. | Low satiety, often encouraging overconsumption. |
| Shelf Life | Often shorter shelf life due to fewer preservatives. | Long shelf life engineered for convenience and profit. |
| Examples | Fresh fruits, vegetables, whole grains, plain yogurt. | Sugary drinks, packaged snacks, instant noodles, frozen meals. |
Conclusion
While the term "junk food" is a familiar part of our vocabulary, the scientifically accurate and more informative term is "ultra-processed food". The NOVA classification system provides a clear framework for understanding how different levels of food processing impact nutritional quality and health. A diet high in UPFs is consistently linked to chronic health conditions like obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, as well as poorer mental and digestive health. The mechanisms behind these risks are complex, involving not just poor nutrient profiles but also industrial additives and altered food structures that affect satiety and reward pathways. By focusing on increasing the consumption of unprocessed and minimally processed foods, and consciously reducing UPFs, you can take a significant step towards a healthier, more balanced nutrition diet. Implementing simple changes like cooking more at home and reading labels can empower you to make more informed food choices. For further reading, an in-depth review on the link between ultra-processed foods and health can be found on the AMA website.
