Skip to content

What is the difference between a low energy diet and a very low energy diet NASM?

5 min read

According to the NASM, a very low energy diet provides less than 800 kilocalories per day, while a low energy diet offers between 800 and 1,200 kilocalories daily. Understanding the difference between a low energy diet and a very low energy diet NASM recognizes is crucial for anyone considering severe caloric restriction for weight management.

Quick Summary

The core distinction between a low energy diet (LED) and a very low energy diet (VLED) lies in their daily calorie targets and the intensity of weight loss. VLEDs involve significant restriction and require medical supervision due to health risks, whereas LEDs are less severe and typically used for moderate weight loss under professional guidance.

Key Points

  • Calorie Difference: NASM defines a VLED as providing less than 800 kcal/day, while an LED provides 800–1,200 kcal/day.

  • Supervision Required: VLEDs necessitate medical supervision due to their extreme caloric restriction and health risks, whereas LEDs can often be managed with nutrition professional guidance.

  • Weight Loss Rate: VLEDs are designed for rapid, short-term weight loss, while LEDs support a slower, more sustainable rate of loss.

  • Diet Composition: VLEDs commonly use pre-formulated meal replacements, while LEDs typically involve consuming calorie-controlled, whole foods.

  • Health Risks: VLEDs carry a higher risk of adverse effects like gallstones, while an LED has a lower risk profile.

  • Long-Term Success: LEDs are generally more conducive to long-term weight maintenance, as VLEDs often face issues with weight regain.

In This Article

Understanding NASM Definitions of Low vs. Very Low Energy Diets

In the field of fitness and nutrition, the National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) provides specific classifications for different types of energy-restricted diets. These classifications are based on the daily caloric intake and serve as a crucial distinction for both fitness professionals and clients. The primary difference between a low energy diet (LED) and a very low energy diet (VLED) is the level of caloric restriction and the associated health implications.

Low Energy Diet (LED) Explained

A low energy diet, as defined by NASM, typically falls within the range of 800 to 1,200 kilocalories per day. This moderate calorie restriction is used to promote gradual weight loss. While still a significant reduction for many individuals, an LED is generally less severe than a VLED. This approach is often integrated into broader, long-term lifestyle change programs that focus on developing sustainable habits for weight management and overall health.

Key characteristics of an LED include:

  • Caloric Range: 800–1,200 kcal/day.
  • Supervision: Professional guidance from a certified nutritionist or health coach is recommended, but not always medically mandatory.
  • Usage: Suitable for moderate weight loss goals or for individuals needing structured dietary guidance.
  • Sustainability: More sustainable than a VLED and easier to transition into a regular, healthy eating pattern for weight maintenance.

Very Low Energy Diet (VLED) Explained

A very low energy diet is a more extreme form of caloric restriction, defined by NASM as providing less than 800 kilocalories per day. These diets are designed for rapid weight loss and are almost always medically supervised due to the potential for adverse health effects. VLEDs often rely on specially formulated meal replacements, such as shakes and bars, to ensure that the body receives a balanced intake of essential nutrients despite the severe energy deficit.

Key characteristics of a VLED include:

  • Caloric Range: Less than 800 kcal/day.
  • Supervision: Medical supervision is a necessity due to the extreme nature of the diet and potential side effects.
  • Usage: Reserved for individuals with significant obesity (e.g., BMI ≥ 30) or those with health-related comorbidities who need rapid weight loss.
  • Composition: Often uses nutritionally complete meal replacements to deliver vitamins, minerals, and high-quality protein.

Potential Side Effects

Both types of diets can have side effects, but they are more pronounced with a VLED. For VLEDs, common side effects include fatigue, constipation, and nausea. A more serious concern is the risk of gallstone formation, which is higher during periods of very rapid weight loss. An LED can also cause mild fatigue or other discomforts as the body adjusts to a lower calorie intake, but these are generally less severe and easier to manage.

Practical Application and Goals

For a fitness professional following NASM guidelines, the choice between an LED and a VLED depends entirely on the client's health status and weight loss goals. An LED is the standard approach for most healthy individuals looking for sustainable weight loss and improved body composition. The gradual nature of an LED allows for the development of lasting nutritional habits. In contrast, a VLED is a powerful medical tool used for specific, rapid weight loss needs and is not intended for long-term use. It is a transitional phase that should be followed by a less restrictive, and more sustainable, nutritional plan.

A Comparative Look at LED vs. VLED (NASM)

Feature Low Energy Diet (LED) Very Low Energy Diet (VLED)
Daily Calories 800–1,200 kcal < 800 kcal
Rate of Weight Loss Moderate and steady Rapid and significant
Supervision Level Professional nutrition guidance recommended Mandatory medical supervision
Primary Use Sustainable weight loss and long-term behavioral change Urgent weight loss for individuals with significant obesity or comorbidities
Diet Composition Standard, balanced meals with calorie restriction Often uses formulated meal replacements (shakes, bars)
Potential Risks Lower risk; potential for minor nutrient deficiencies if not planned properly Higher risk of serious side effects like gallstones and fatigue
Duration Can be followed for extended periods Short-term only (e.g., up to 12-16 weeks), followed by gradual reintroduction of regular foods

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Path

For individuals seeking to lose weight, it's essential to recognize that a low energy diet and a very low energy diet are not interchangeable. According to NASM and broader nutritional science, the appropriate choice is determined by one's specific health needs and the supervision available. While a VLED may offer faster initial results, it comes with greater health risks and requires stringent medical oversight. A well-structured LED, with its slower but more sustainable progress, is the safer and more effective option for most people aiming for lasting weight loss and healthier lifestyle habits. Always consult with a healthcare provider or a certified nutrition coach before embarking on any highly restrictive dietary plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about Energy-Restricted Diets

What does NASM stand for in the context of diet and nutrition?

NASM stands for the National Academy of Sports Medicine, a prominent organization that provides certifications and guidelines for fitness and nutrition professionals.

Why do Very Low Energy Diets require medical supervision?

Due to the extreme calorie restriction (under 800 kcal/day), VLEDs pose a higher risk of nutrient deficiencies, metabolic changes, and other health complications, making medical oversight essential for safety.

Can anyone follow a Low Energy Diet without supervision?

While not as extreme as a VLED, it is still highly recommended to seek guidance from a nutrition professional like a NASM-certified coach to ensure the diet is nutritionally adequate and safe for your individual needs.

What are some common side effects of a Very Low Energy Diet?

Common side effects can include fatigue, constipation, nausea, and the increased risk of developing gallstones.

Is a VLED more effective than an LED for long-term weight loss?

Studies show that while VLEDs produce greater short-term weight loss, they are not significantly more effective for long-term weight management compared to a low energy diet. Weight regain is common after ceasing a VLED.

How does exercise fit into a VLED or LED plan?

Regular physical activity, including resistance training, is vital for both diet types to help preserve lean body mass during weight loss, though exercise intensity may be limited on a VLED due to low energy.

What is the recommended duration for a Very Low Energy Diet?

NASM guidelines and medical experts typically recommend a maximum duration of 12 to 16 weeks for a VLED, followed by a gradual transition to a more moderate dietary plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary factor is the daily caloric intake. A very low energy diet (VLED) is under 800 kcal/day, while a low energy diet (LED) is between 800 and 1,200 kcal/day.

Meal replacement products in a VLED are formulated to provide essential vitamins, minerals, and protein in controlled portions, ensuring nutritional adequacy despite the severe calorie restriction.

No, a VLED is not suitable for everyone. It is typically reserved for individuals with significant obesity or specific medical conditions who require rapid weight loss and should only be performed under strict medical supervision.

Exercise, particularly resistance training, is crucial to help preserve lean body mass during periods of energy restriction, minimizing muscle loss that can occur with weight loss.

Not necessarily. While VLEDs can lead to significant initial weight loss, studies suggest that they are not more effective for long-term weight maintenance than more moderate approaches. Weight regain is a common issue after stopping a VLED.

A fitness professional should refer the client to a medical doctor or registered dietitian for evaluation and supervision, as a VLED is a medical intervention that falls outside the scope of practice for most fitness certifications.

Adherence to an LED can be more sustainable long-term, allowing clients to learn and build healthier eating habits. A VLED is highly restrictive and difficult to maintain, which can lead to behavioral challenges and rebound weight gain.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.