Skip to content

What is the difference between AG1 and Field of Greens? A Nutritional Comparison

3 min read

The market for greens powders has surged, with millions of users turning to supplements to bridge nutritional gaps. But with so many options available, understanding what is the difference between AG1 and Field of Greens is crucial for making an informed decision about your daily nutrient intake.

Quick Summary

AG1 is an all-in-one nutritional supplement with a wide array of vitamins, minerals, and probiotics, while Field of Greens focuses on a USDA organic, whole-food formula. This comparison breaks down their differing ingredient philosophies, transparency, and target benefits to aid consumer choice.

Key Points

  • Core Philosophy: AG1 is an all-in-one supplement with 75+ ingredients, while Field of Greens focuses on a more direct, whole-food blend of organic fruits and vegetables.

  • Third-Party Certification: AG1 is NSF Certified for Sport, ensuring it's free of banned substances, while Field of Greens lacks this specific certification.

  • Ingredient Transparency: AG1 uses proprietary blends, so exact amounts of certain ingredients are unknown; Field of Greens, using a Nutrition Facts panel, provides more transparency on its whole-food content.

  • Organic Sourcing: Field of Greens is USDA Certified Organic, guaranteeing its produce quality, whereas AG1 contains organic ingredients but does not carry a full organic certification.

  • Cost per Serving: AG1 is significantly more expensive per serving than Field of Greens, making budget a key factor in the decision.

  • Gut Health Focus: AG1 features a robust blend of both probiotics and digestive enzymes for gut support, while Field of Greens contains prebiotics and a smaller probiotic component.

  • Flavor Variety: Field of Greens offers a wider range of flavor options, whereas AG1 is available in fewer, more subtle flavors.

In This Article

The global dietary supplements market was valued at over $150 billion in 2024, reflecting a growing consumer interest in optimizing nutrition. Greens powders, in particular, have emerged as a popular category, but not all are created equal. When comparing Athletic Greens' AG1 and Field of Greens by BrickHouse Nutrition, the core distinctions lie in their formulation philosophy, ingredient transparency, and target audience. One is a comprehensive, all-in-one daily health drink, while the other positions itself as a straight-forward, whole-food vegetable and fruit powder.

The Core Difference: All-in-One vs. Whole Food Focus

AG1 and Field of Greens differ significantly in their primary approach. AG1 is formulated as a comprehensive nutritional supplement with a wide range of ingredients, aiming to replace multiple daily supplements. Field of Greens, on the other hand, emphasizes providing nutrients from organic, whole fruits and vegetables.

AG1: The Comprehensive Blend

AG1 contains over 75 ingredients, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, prebiotics, digestive enzymes, adaptogens, and mushrooms. It is designed to support energy, gut health, immune function, stress recovery, and cognitive health. AG1 uses proprietary blends, meaning the exact quantity of each ingredient isn't fully disclosed. It is NSF Certified for Sport.

Field of Greens: The Organic Produce Supplement

Field of Greens focuses on organic, freeze-dried fruits and vegetables to supplement dietary intake. It aims to provide nutrients from real food to help fill nutritional gaps. Field of Greens uses a Nutrition Facts panel for greater transparency, though some blends may still be proprietary. They also offer variations targeting specific needs like energy or cognitive function.

Ingredient Philosophy and Transparency

AG1 and Field of Greens also differ in their ingredient sourcing and labeling. AG1 prioritizes ingredient potency and bioavailability, with extensive testing for contaminants, but it is not certified organic. Field of Greens' main feature is its USDA organic certification, ensuring its fruit and vegetable ingredients are organic. AG1's use of proprietary blends can make it difficult to know the exact dosage of certain ingredients. Field of Greens aims for clearer labeling with its food-based panel.

Comparison Table

Feature AG1 Field of Greens
Core Philosophy All-in-one daily health drink, multivitamin replacement. Whole, organic fruit and vegetable supplement.
Ingredient Count 75+ ingredients, including vitamins, minerals, adaptogens, probiotics, and enzymes. Approx. 20 ingredients focused on greens, reds, and metabolic blends.
Ingredient Type Extracts and whole-food sourced nutrients. USDA certified organic, freeze-dried fruits and vegetables.
Transparency Uses proprietary blends, obscuring exact amounts of key ingredients. Uses a Nutrition Facts panel for a food-based approach.
Third-Party Testing NSF Certified for Sport, ensuring safety and quality. Not third-party tested, which can be a concern for some users.
Gut Health Robust blend of 7.2 billion CFUs of probiotics and digestive enzymes. Contains prebiotics and a single strain of probiotics, though potentially less concentrated.
Organic Status Contains many organic ingredients, but not certified organic. USDA Certified Organic.
Flavor Options Limited flavors, typically with a pineapple/vanilla profile. Wider variety of flavors, including Original, Wildberry, and Strawberry Lemonade.
Price Generally more expensive per serving. Typically less expensive per serving.

Choosing the Right Greens Powder

Selecting between AG1 and Field of Greens depends on your specific needs. AG1 may be suitable if you want a comprehensive, all-in-one supplement and are comfortable with proprietary blends. Field of Greens might be preferred if you prioritize organic, whole-food ingredients and a potentially lower price point. Consider your budget and desired level of ingredient transparency when making your decision.

Conclusion

AG1 and Field of Greens both aim to boost nutrient intake but with different approaches. AG1 offers a broad spectrum of ingredients in an all-in-one formula with third-party testing but uses proprietary blends. Field of Greens focuses on organic, whole-food ingredients with more transparent labeling and a lower cost per serving. Your choice should align with your dietary goals, budget, and preference for formula complexity versus organic certification.

Explore a detailed review of AG1 to learn more.

Frequently Asked Questions

AG1 contains a more robust and varied blend of both prebiotics and probiotics, as well as digestive enzymes, making it a more comprehensive choice for dedicated gut health support.

Field of Greens is typically less expensive per serving than AG1. However, the 'better' value depends on your priorities; AG1 is a pricier all-in-one supplement, while Field of Greens offers a more affordable, whole-food-focused formula.

No, neither AG1 nor Field of Greens should replace whole, natural foods in your diet. Both are intended to be supplements that help fill nutritional gaps, not meal replacements.

Field of Greens offers a wider variety of flavor options, which may make it more palatable for picky eaters. Its fruit-focused flavor profile is often described as sweeter and less 'grassy' than many other greens powders.

Field of Greens is USDA Certified Organic, meaning its ingredients meet strict organic standards. AG1 contains many organic ingredients but does not hold a full organic certification, instead focusing on robust testing for contaminants.

AG1 is NSF Certified for Sport, a third-party verification that tests for hundreds of banned substances, making it the safer and more transparent choice for athletes concerned about drug testing. Field of Greens does not have this certification.

Yes, both companies offer travel-friendly options. AG1 provides single-serve travel packs, while Field of Greens also comes in convenient on-the-go packs.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.