Skip to content

What is the difference between enteral and parenteral?

4 min read

According to the American College of Gastroenterology, enteral nutrition is generally the preferred feeding method when possible, as it is cheaper and associated with fewer complications than parenteral nutrition. Understanding what is the difference between enteral and parenteral feeding is crucial for medical professionals and caregivers determining the most appropriate nutritional support for a patient.

Quick Summary

Enteral feeding uses the gastrointestinal tract for nutrient delivery via mouth or feeding tube, while parenteral feeding bypasses the digestive system entirely, delivering nutrients intravenously. The choice depends on the patient's gut function, health status, and nutritional needs.

Key Points

  • Route of Administration: Enteral nutrition uses the digestive tract, while parenteral nutrition bypasses it entirely, delivering nutrients intravenously.

  • Gut Function Determines Choice: If the patient's gut is functional, enteral feeding is the preferred and safer method. If the gut is compromised, parenteral nutrition is necessary.

  • Complexity and Cost: Parenteral nutrition is more complex, invasive, and significantly more expensive due to the sterile preparation and intensive monitoring required.

  • Associated Risks: The primary risks for enteral feeding include tube-related issues and refeeding syndrome, while parenteral feeding carries a higher risk of systemic infection and severe metabolic complications.

  • Patient Condition Dictates Need: Indications for enteral feeding include dysphagia or impaired consciousness with a working gut. Indications for parenteral include bowel obstruction, severe pancreatitis, or short bowel syndrome.

In This Article

Enteral Nutrition: Feeding the Gut

Enteral nutrition (EN) is a method of delivering nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This can occur either orally, via a liquid supplement, or through a feeding tube, which is the most common use of the term in a clinical setting. The defining characteristic is that the digestive system is functional and is being used to absorb nutrients, which is closer to normal eating. The route of administration is chosen based on the patient's specific needs, expected duration of feeding, and GI function.

Types of Enteral Feeding Access

  • Nasogastric (NG) tube: A tube inserted through the nose and into the stomach. Typically for short-term use (4-6 weeks).
  • Nasoenteric tubes: Tubes placed through the nose into the small intestine, including the nasoduodenal (into the duodenum) and nasojejunal (into the jejunum) tubes. These are used when feeding into the stomach is not possible or tolerated.
  • Gastrostomy tube: A tube surgically or endoscopically placed directly through the abdominal wall into the stomach, such as a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube. This is for long-term use.
  • Jejunostomy tube: A tube placed directly into the jejunum, bypassing the stomach. This is suitable for patients with severe gastric motility issues or those who need to feed past the stomach.

Parenteral Nutrition: Bypassing the Digestive Tract

Parenteral nutrition (PN) provides nutrition directly into the bloodstream, completely bypassing the digestive system. This method is reserved for patients whose GI tract is not functioning or cannot be safely used. The nutrient solution, formulated for the individual, is administered intravenously via a catheter. PN is a more complex and costly intervention than EN and carries a higher risk of serious complications, such as infection.

Types of Parenteral Nutrition

  • Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN): Delivered through a peripheral vein, typically in the arm. Because smaller veins can only handle less concentrated solutions, PPN is used for partial or temporary nutritional support, usually for less than two weeks.
  • Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) / Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN): A highly concentrated and complete nutritional formula delivered through a central vein, such as the superior vena cava near the heart. A central line, like a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or a tunneled catheter, is necessary for this type of administration. TPN provides all essential nutrients when a patient cannot tolerate any enteral intake.

Key Factors Influencing the Choice

Several factors guide a healthcare team in deciding between enteral and parenteral nutrition for a patient. These include the patient's underlying condition, GI tract function, the expected duration of nutritional support, and the risk of complications. The mantra in nutrition support is often “if the gut works, use it,” highlighting the preference for enteral feeding due to its lower cost and lower risk profile.

Indications for Each Feeding Method

Enteral Nutrition is indicated when:

  • The patient cannot meet nutritional needs with oral intake alone.
  • The GI tract is functional and accessible.
  • Conditions like stroke, head injury, head/neck cancer, or severe dysphagia prevent safe swallowing.
  • Certain GI conditions like Crohn's disease allow for nutrient absorption but require a tube.
  • Patients are mechanically ventilated.

Parenteral Nutrition is indicated when:

  • The GI tract is non-functional or inaccessible.
  • Severe conditions require bowel rest, such as severe pancreatitis, high-output fistulas, or bowel obstruction.
  • There is severe malabsorption, short bowel syndrome, or intestinal failure.
  • Prolonged periods of nothing-by-mouth (NPO) status are required, often exceeding 7 days.

Enteral vs. Parenteral Nutrition: A Comparison Table

Feature Enteral Nutrition Parenteral Nutrition
Administration Route Via the gastrointestinal tract (oral or feeding tube). Intravenously (directly into a vein).
Digestive System Use Utilizes the GI tract for digestion and absorption. Bypasses the GI tract completely.
Cost Generally less expensive. Significantly more expensive.
Risk of Infection Lower risk of infection. Higher risk of systemic infection (sepsis) due to catheter access.
Impact on Gut Health Helps preserve the gut's mucosal barrier and immune function, preventing atrophy. No gut stimulation, which can lead to gut atrophy over time.
Administration Site Can be delivered through tubes in the nose, mouth, or directly into the stomach/intestine. Delivered via peripheral or central venous catheters.
Nutrient Formulation Prepared liquid formulas containing macronutrients and micronutrients. Sterile, custom-mixed solutions tailored to individual needs.
Monitoring Needs Requires less intensive monitoring; includes feeding tolerance and tube site care. Requires intensive monitoring of blood glucose, electrolytes, and liver function.
Metabolic Risk Risk of refeeding syndrome and electrolyte imbalances, particularly in malnourished patients. Higher risk of severe metabolic complications like blood glucose imbalance, liver issues, and electrolyte abnormalities.

Conclusion

Enteral and parenteral nutrition are both critical forms of medical nutritional support, but they serve different patient populations based on the functionality of the digestive system. Enteral nutrition, which uses the GI tract, is the preferred and safer option whenever possible, leveraging the body's natural digestive processes. In contrast, parenteral nutrition is a life-sustaining intervention reserved for when the gut is compromised. While more invasive and prone to complications, it provides essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream for individuals who cannot absorb them otherwise. The decision to use either method is complex and involves a multidisciplinary healthcare team assessing the patient's medical status and nutritional needs to ensure the best possible outcome. For further information on the role of nutrition in clinical care, refer to resources from reputable organizations like the American College of Gastroenterology.

American College of Gastroenterology

Frequently Asked Questions

Enteral nutrition is a method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to deliver nutritional formulas, either orally or through a feeding tube, for patients who cannot consume or absorb enough nutrients by eating alone.

Parenteral nutrition is used when a patient's gastrointestinal tract is non-functional or severely compromised and they cannot receive adequate nutrition via the enteral route. Conditions can include bowel obstruction, severe pancreatitis, or short bowel syndrome.

Enteral nutrition is generally considered safer than parenteral nutrition. Because it uses the body's natural digestive system, it has a lower risk of infection and metabolic complications compared to bypassing the GI tract entirely.

Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) is a form of parenteral nutrition where a patient receives 100% of their nutritional requirements intravenously. It is used when the digestive system cannot be used at all.

A feeding tube is used for enteral nutrition to deliver liquid food into the stomach or intestine. An IV (intravenous) line is used for parenteral nutrition to deliver nutrient solutions directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system.

Common risks of parenteral nutrition include blood clots, infections at the catheter site (which can lead to sepsis), metabolic complications like glucose imbalances, and long-term liver or gallbladder problems.

Yes, a patient can be on a combination of both enteral and parenteral nutrition. This is often referred to as supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) and is used when enteral intake is insufficient to meet all nutritional requirements.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.