Understanding the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)
The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a widely used tool for identifying malnutrition risk in older adults. This non-invasive assessment helps healthcare professionals evaluate nutritional status in various settings and is crucial for detecting problems early. The MNA comes in two main forms, each with different scoring ranges: the full MNA (MNA-FF) and the MNA Short Form (MNA-SF).
The Highest Score on the Full MNA
The full MNA, which includes 18 items, has a maximum score of 30 points. A score of 30 indicates normal nutritional status. The scoring categories for the full MNA are:
- 24 to 30 points: Normal nutritional status
- 17 to 23.5 points: At risk of malnutrition
- Less than 17 points: Malnourished
The full MNA assesses several areas, including anthropometric measurements, general health, dietary intake, and subjective assessments.
The Highest Score on the MNA Short Form (MNA-SF)
The MNA-SF is a shorter, six-item version used for rapid screening, with a highest possible score of 14 points. A score of 12 or more suggests good nutrition, while a score of 11 or less requires further assessment with the full MNA. The MNA-SF scoring categories are:
- 12 to 14 points: Normal nutritional status
- 8 to 11 points: At risk of malnutrition
- 0 to 7 points: Malnourished
How is the MNA Scored?
Scoring involves summing points from various questions and measurements. The full MNA includes detailed assessments of anthropometrics, general health, diet, and subjective factors. The MNA-SF is more focused, using six key items like food intake changes, weight loss, and mobility to quickly identify risk. Calf circumference can substitute BMI in the MNA-SF if needed.
MNA vs. MNA-SF: A Comparison
| Feature | Full MNA (MNA-FF) | MNA Short Form (MNA-SF) | 
|---|---|---|
| Number of Items | 18 | 6 | 
| Highest Possible Score | 30 points | 14 points | 
| Purpose | Comprehensive nutritional assessment | Rapid nutritional screening | 
| Scoring Categories (Normal) | 24–30 points | 12–14 points | 
| Scoring Categories (At Risk) | 17–23.5 points | 8–11 points | 
| Scoring Categories (Malnourished) | <17 points | 0–7 points | 
| Primary Use Case | Detailed evaluation after screening or as a primary tool | First-line screening, low scores prompt full MNA | 
The Meaning of a High MNA Score
A high MNA score in either version signifies good nutritional health and is linked to positive health outcomes in older adults. This includes improved physical function, shorter hospital stays, and reduced mortality. Conversely, low scores are predictors of adverse outcomes like longer hospital stays and higher readmission rates. Regular MNA use is vital for early intervention in geriatric care.
Factors Influencing MNA Scores
Several factors captured by the MNA questions can impact an individual's score. These include:
- Mobility: Difficulty moving can affect food access and preparation.
- Psychological Stress or Acute Disease: Illness or stress can reduce appetite and cause weight loss.
- Dementia or Depression: These conditions can alter appetite and eating habits.
- Medication Use: Multiple medications can cause side effects impacting nutrition.
- Self-Perception: A person's view of their own health often reflects their nutritional status.
Conclusion
The MNA is a crucial tool for assessing nutritional health in older adults. The highest scores are 30 for the full MNA and 14 for the MNA Short Form. High scores indicate good nutrition and are associated with better health outcomes, while low scores signal malnutrition risk requiring intervention. Healthcare providers use the MNA's clear scoring system to identify individuals needing nutritional support, thereby improving their health and life quality. For more information, the MNA Elderly Website provides official guides.