What is the lawsuit against Vital Farms eggs? The allegations
A class-action complaint was filed against Vital Farms in May 2021 by consumers alleging deceptive advertising and "greenwashing". Key allegations included misleading claims about "pasture-raised" conditions and inhumane treatment, citing standard industry practices. Allegations also suggested the company's focus on high production might impact hen health.
The legal proceedings and Vital Farms' defense
Vital Farms' initial defense
Vital Farms defended its practices, stating they are ethical and humane, and highlighted independent audits and certifications. The company also provided transparency regarding infrared beak trimming.
Court rulings and the dismissal
Vital Farms' initial attempt to dismiss the class-action was denied. The PETA Foundation withdrew from the lawsuit in 2023. In late 2024, the class-action claims against Vital Farms were dismissed, with plaintiffs dropping their claims by January 2025 without settlement payment from Vital Farms.
A separate settlement with PETA
A distinct settlement involved PETA, where Vital Farms paid PETA $292,000 in 2023. This was unrelated to deceptive advertising claims but resolved a dispute over sanctions for Vital Farms issuing overly broad subpoenas against PETA.
Comparison of claims and outcomes
| Aspect | Plaintiffs' Allegations | Vital Farms' Defense | Legal Outcome (Class-Action) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deceptive 'Pasture-Raised' | Claimed practice didn't meet consumer expectations. | Stated it met Certified Humane standards and provided ample outdoor access. | Judge initially allowed claim, later dismissed. |
| Inhumane Practices | Cited male chick culling and beak trimming. | Defended infrared beak trimming and overall humane approach. | Claims included in dismissed lawsuit. |
| Investor Deception | Suggested false ethical claims inflated stock price. | Maintained commitment to "conscious capitalism". | Part of the dismissed suit. |
| PETA Subpoena | PETA sought to quash burdensome demands. | Attempted to compel extensive documents. | Court imposed sanctions, leading to $292,000 settlement with PETA. |
Conclusion
The lawsuit against Vital Farms eggs alleged deceptive marketing and greenwashing. While initially proceeding, the consumer class-action was dismissed in 2024 without Vital Farms settling with the consumer plaintiffs. A separate settlement with PETA related to subpoena sanctions occurred. This case highlights scrutiny of food marketing and verifying ethical claims. {Link: FTC provides guidance on environmental marketing claims https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertising/green-marketing/green-guides}.
Further Reading
{Link: FTC provides guidance on environmental marketing claims https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/truth-advertising/green-marketing/green-guides} which are relevant to lawsuits like the one against Vital Farms.