Skip to content

What is the nutritional screening tool for adults? Understanding the key methods for identifying malnutrition risk

4 min read

Malnutrition significantly impacts health outcomes, affecting a large percentage of hospitalized and community-dwelling adults. Knowing what is the nutritional screening tool for adults is the first step healthcare professionals take to identify individuals at risk, allowing for timely and effective nutritional intervention.

Quick Summary

Nutritional screening identifies adults at risk of malnutrition, enabling early intervention to improve clinical outcomes. Common tools like MUST, NRS-2002, and MNA-SF quickly and systematically assess key indicators such as BMI, weight changes, and dietary intake. This process guides targeted nutritional care.

Key Points

  • Early Identification: The primary purpose of nutritional screening is to quickly identify adults who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition to enable early intervention.

  • Multiple Tools: Different validated tools exist for different settings and populations, including MUST, NRS-2002, and MNA-SF.

  • Screening vs. Assessment: Screening is a rapid process for risk identification, while a nutritional assessment is a more detailed, in-depth evaluation usually performed by a dietitian.

  • Key Metrics: Screening tools commonly evaluate BMI, recent unintentional weight loss, changes in dietary intake, and the impact of acute illness.

  • Improved Outcomes: Effective nutritional screening and follow-up care can reduce hospital stays, complications, and mortality, while improving overall quality of life.

  • Geriatric Focus: The MNA-SF is a sensitive tool specifically designed and validated for assessing malnutrition risk in individuals aged 65 and older.

  • Systematic Process: Successful screening requires choosing the right tool, screening routinely on admission, accurately interpreting results, and referring at-risk patients for a full assessment.

In This Article

Defining Nutritional Screening

Nutritional screening is a quick and simple process to identify individuals who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. Unlike a comprehensive nutritional assessment performed by a dietitian, screening is designed for rapid risk identification and can be performed by various healthcare workers. Early detection is paramount because malnutrition can lead to numerous adverse health consequences, including a weakened immune system, prolonged hospital stays, increased complications, and higher mortality rates.

Screening is particularly vital in healthcare settings where malnutrition rates are often high, such as in hospitals, nursing homes, and outpatient clinics. It helps to initiate the nutrition care process, which includes a more detailed assessment and the development of a nutrition care plan for at-risk patients.

Key Nutritional Screening Tools for Adults

Several validated and reliable tools are used globally to screen for nutritional risk in adults. The selection of a tool often depends on the clinical setting and the patient population. Some of the most widely recognized tools include:

Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST)

The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) is a widely used five-step tool designed for all care settings. It assesses BMI, unintentional weight loss over 3–6 months, and the effect of acute disease on nutritional intake over 5 days. These factors contribute to an overall risk score (low, medium, or high), which guides a care plan.

Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002)

Recommended by ESPEN for hospital settings, especially for acutely ill patients, the NRS-2002 identifies those likely to benefit from nutritional support. A pre-screening questionnaire assesses BMI, weight loss, reduced intake, and severity of illness. If any apply, a detailed assessment scores illness severity and nutritional status impairment, with an additional point for patients over 70. A score of 3 or higher indicates high risk.

Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF)

The MNA-SF is a quick tool for patients aged 65 and older. It assesses changes in food intake and weight loss over 3 months, mobility, psychological stress or acute disease, and neuropsychological problems. It also includes BMI, or calf circumference as an alternative.

Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)

The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a validated clinical method using patient interview and physical examination. It evaluates changes in weight, intake, GI symptoms, functional capacity, and signs of muscle and fat wasting to classify patients as well-nourished, moderately, or severely malnourished. The Patient-Generated SGA (PG-SGA) is a scored version useful for oncology patients.

The Role and Importance of Nutritional Screening

Routine nutritional screening is crucial in healthcare as it's the first step in the nutrition care process, enabling proactive intervention. Screening helps prevent the worsening cycle of disease and malnutrition. Its benefits include targeted care for those most in need, improved patient outcomes like faster recovery and fewer complications, cost savings through reduced hospital stays, and ensuring continuous care.

Comparing Nutritional Screening Tools

Feature MUST (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool) NRS-2002 (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002) MNA-SF (Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form) SGA (Subjective Global Assessment)
Target Population General adults across all settings, including those who are obese. Hospitalized adults, particularly those with acute illnesses. Geriatric patients (65 and older). Adult patients, especially in hospital settings.
Primary Setting Hospital, community, care homes. Hospital. Community, hospital, nursing homes for elderly. Hospital, but also validated for other settings.
Key Criteria BMI, unintentional weight loss, acute disease effect. Initial questions on BMI, weight loss, dietary intake, plus scoring for illness severity and age. Changes in intake, weight loss, mobility, stress, neuropsychological issues, BMI (or calf circumference). Weight history, intake changes, GI symptoms, functional capacity, physical exam.
Scoring Total score (0, 1, ≥2) for low, medium, or high risk. Total score (0–7), with ≥3 indicating high risk. Total score (0–14), with a score ≤11 indicating malnutrition risk. Categorical: Well-nourished (A), Moderately (B), or Severely (C) malnourished.
Usability Simple, quick, and can be completed by any trained care worker. Requires some clinical judgment for scoring illness severity, but simple pre-screening exists. Quick and easy, with optional calf circumference measurement for immobile patients. Requires a trained healthcare professional, more subjective than other tools.

How to Implement Nutritional Screening

Implementing nutritional screening effectively involves choosing the right tool for the setting and population (e.g., MUST for community, NRS-2002 for hospitals, MNA-SF for elderly). Screening should occur routinely, such as on hospital admission or during check-ups for at-risk groups. Accurate data collection, including BMI or alternatives like calf circumference, is essential. The risk score should be interpreted correctly, and at-risk patients should be referred for a full nutritional assessment and care plan. Regular re-screening is important as nutritional status can change.

Conclusion

Nutritional screening is a vital initial step in addressing malnutrition risk in adults across various healthcare settings. Using validated tools like MUST, NRS-2002, or MNA-SF allows for rapid identification of patients at risk, facilitating timely assessment and intervention. This proactive approach improves patient outcomes, shortens hospital stays, and reduces healthcare costs. Integrating standardized nutritional screening ensures that nutritional care is a key component of comprehensive patient management.

For more detailed information on specific screening protocols, the full MUST guide is available on the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN) website.

Frequently Asked Questions

Nutritional screening is a quick initial process to identify individuals at risk of malnutrition, usually performed by frontline healthcare staff. A nutritional assessment is a comprehensive, in-depth evaluation to diagnose malnutrition and determine the cause and severity, and is typically carried out by a registered dietitian.

Routine nutritional screening should be performed on all adults in healthcare settings, including upon hospital admission and at regular intervals in residential care or outpatient clinics. Screening is also recommended for older adults or those with chronic diseases.

A high risk score indicates that an individual is either malnourished or at significant risk of becoming so. This result should trigger a referral for a full nutritional assessment and the initiation of a detailed nutrition care plan.

No, the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) is specifically designed and validated for assessing malnutrition risk in geriatric patients aged 65 and older. Other tools like MUST or NRS-2002 are more appropriate for the general adult population.

Yes, tools like the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) are designed to identify malnutrition and obesity in adults of all ages. A patient with a high BMI can still be at risk for malnutrition due to micronutrient deficiencies or unintentional weight loss.

For institutionalized patients, it is recommended to repeat screening every three months. For community-dwelling elderly, an annual screening is suggested. Re-screening is also necessary after an acute illness or any significant change in clinical condition.

Some screening tools provide alternatives. For example, the MNA-SF allows for the use of calf circumference as a substitute for BMI when an individual is unable to be weighed or measured. Other methods, such as mid-arm circumference, may also be used.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.