Understanding the Evolution of RDA
Resource Description and Access (RDA) is a modern content standard used by libraries, archives, and other cultural heritage organizations to create metadata for information resources. It is the successor to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2), a long-standing but increasingly outdated standard developed for card catalogs. RDA was first published online in 2010, marking a significant shift from the print-centric rules of its predecessor. The transition from AACR2 to RDA was driven by the need for a cataloging standard that could effectively describe the ever-growing volume and variety of digital resources, ensuring greater flexibility and integration with modern technologies like the Semantic Web.
The evolution didn't stop there. Over time, the RDA Toolkit underwent a significant restructure, resulting in what is now known as the "Official RDA." This revised version, built upon the updated IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM), was officially launched in December 2020 and provides a more comprehensive, user-focused framework for metadata creation. Official RDA moves away from some of the Anglo-American traditions to become a more flexible, truly international standard. It was developed with the end-user in mind, aiming to make resource discovery and access more intuitive and to allow for better integration of library data with external metadata communities.
Key Differences Between Original RDA and Official RDA
While both standards serve the same core purpose of describing information resources, there are several key distinctions between the Original RDA and its Official successor. The most significant change is the underlying conceptual model. Original RDA was based on the FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD models, whereas Official RDA is based on the consolidated IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). This shift led to a reorganization of the standard, affecting its structure and terminology.
The Impact of Linked Data
Official RDA places a much stronger emphasis on the principles of linked data, a critical component for integrating library data into the wider web ecosystem. While Original RDA acknowledged linked data, the Official version was designed from the ground up to be compatible with these principles, using RDF (Resource Description Framework) vocabulaires to describe entities and their relationships. This makes library metadata more interoperable and functional outside of traditional library catalogs.
Official RDA's New Entities and Elements
The Official version is organized around 13 core entities, replacing the previous entity structure. This new organization, based on the IFLA LRM, provides a more logical and robust framework for describing resources. The guidance is also more explicit about how to handle different attributes and relationships, providing a more consistent approach for catalogers.
Official RDA Implementation and Future
Official RDA is continuously undergoing further development through a cooperative international process. Its rollout and implementation are being coordinated by various national and international library standards bodies. The transition requires training for catalogers and changes to library systems, but it positions libraries for the future by making their data more accessible on the web and more adaptable to new technologies.
Comparison Table: Original RDA vs. Official RDA
| Feature | Original RDA (2010-2017) | Official RDA (December 2020 onward) | 
|---|---|---|
| Underlying Conceptual Model | Based on FRBR, FRAD, FRSAD models. | Based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). | 
| Linked Data Emphasis | Acknowledged but not fully integrated; less focused on native linked data compatibility. | Built from the ground up to be compatible with linked data principles (using RDF vocabulaires). | 
| Organization | Organized in chapters based on types of resources. | Reorganized based on 13 core entities derived from the IFLA LRM. | 
| Flexibility | Retained more Anglo-American traditions; less flexible for global application. | More international, flexible, and extensible framework for describing all resources. | 
| Legacy Data | Maintained more backward compatibility with AACR2 records. | Designed for forward compatibility and to enhance the functionality of new metadata, while requiring some changes to existing workflows. | 
| Encoding | Encoding schemes were less standardized and often followed AACR2 patterns. | Utilizes new MARC tags (336, 337, 338) to clearly separate content, media, and carrier types. | 
| End-User Focus | Focused on creating a descriptive cataloging standard. | Explicitly designed with the end-user in mind to improve resource discovery and access. | 
Impact and Future of the Official RDA
The adoption of Official RDA represents a crucial step for libraries and other information institutions. It helps to ensure that bibliographic data remains relevant and accessible in the digital age. By providing a flexible, international framework, Official RDA facilitates a more seamless integration of library catalogs with external data systems, leveraging the power of linked data. This transition allows catalogers to describe both traditional and modern resources more effectively and consistently. The end result is a more robust and user-friendly experience, making it easier for people to find, identify, select, and obtain the resources they need. Ongoing development and refinement of the standard are managed by the RDA Steering Committee (RSC), ensuring it continues to evolve with technological advancements.
In conclusion, the official RDA is not merely a revision but a modernization of the resource description standard, designed to meet the demands of a digital-first world. It enables greater interoperability, user-friendliness, and efficiency in metadata creation, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of cataloging. Its successful implementation will be key to the continued relevance of library data and information access for generations to come.
Visit the ALA RDA Toolkit for more official information on Resource Description & Access.