Skip to content

Monk Fruit vs. Stevia: What's Healthier, Monk Fruit or Stevia?

4 min read

According to the World Health Organization, excessive sugar intake contributes to weight gain and chronic diseases. Natural zero-calorie sweeteners like monk fruit and stevia are popular sugar substitutes, but when it comes to deciding what's healthier, monk fruit or stevia, the answer depends on individual health goals, taste preferences, and potential side effects.

Quick Summary

This article compares monk fruit and stevia based on their origins, sweetness profile, health benefits, side effects, cost, and availability. It helps determine which zero-calorie natural sweetener is the best choice for various dietary needs.

Key Points

  • Taste is a major differentiator: Monk fruit offers a clean, neutral, and fruity taste without the bitter aftertaste often found in stevia.

  • Blood sugar impact is minimal for both: Both sweeteners have a glycemic index of zero, making them safe for individuals with diabetes when used in pure forms.

  • Monk fruit has fewer known side effects: While some people experience digestive discomfort with stevia, monk fruit has few reported side effects when consumed on its own.

  • Look out for added ingredients: Many commercial products blend these natural sweeteners with bulking agents like sugar alcohols, which can cause digestive issues and impact blood sugar.

  • Cost and availability differ: Stevia is generally more affordable and widely available, whereas monk fruit is typically more expensive and less common.

  • Consider potential added health benefits: Monk fruit contains mogrosides with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, a potential benefit beyond its sweetness.

In This Article

Origins and Processing: Natural vs. Natural

Both monk fruit and stevia are derived from plants, but their sources and processing methods differ.

Monk Fruit

Monk fruit, or luo han guo, comes from a small, round fruit native to southern China, where it has been used in traditional medicine for centuries. The sweetener is produced by removing the seeds and skin, crushing the fruit, and extracting the sweet compounds, called mogrosides. Pure monk fruit extract is free of glucose and fructose.

Stevia

Stevia is derived from the Stevia rebaudiana plant, native to South America. The sweet components, known as steviol glycosides, are extracted from the leaves. It’s important to note that only highly purified steviol glycosides have received a 'Generally Recognized as Safe' (GRAS) status from the FDA. Less-refined or whole-leaf stevia products do not have this status due to insufficient research.

Taste and Sweetness Differences

Your palate will likely play a significant role in which sweetener you prefer. This is a key factor when considering what's healthier, monk fruit or stevia, for long-term use.

Monk Fruit Taste

Monk fruit is known for having a clean, neutral, and sugar-like sweetness, often described as slightly fruity. It is significantly sweeter than sugar, at around 100 to 250 times the sweetness. Critically, most people find it lacks the bitter or metallic aftertaste sometimes associated with stevia.

Stevia Taste

Stevia is even sweeter, at 200 to 400 times the sweetness of table sugar. Its taste is often described as more herbal or licorice-like. For many, especially when used in higher concentrations, it leaves a distinct bitter aftertaste. This bitterness can be a deterrent for those seeking a one-to-one sugar replacement in baking and beverages.

Comparison Table: Monk Fruit vs. Stevia

Feature Monk Fruit Stevia
Origin Fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii) Plant (Stevia rebaudiana)
Sweetness 100–250x sweeter than sugar 200–400x sweeter than sugar
Taste Profile Clean, slightly fruity, neutral Herbal, sometimes with a bitter or metallic aftertaste
Aftertaste Generally none Noticeable bitter aftertaste for some
Glycemic Index 0 0
Calories 0 0
Cost Generally more expensive due to complex farming Usually more affordable and widely available
Antioxidants Contains beneficial mogrosides Some evidence of antioxidant properties
Known Side Effects Few reported side effects Rare digestive issues (gas, bloating), potential hormone or gut microbiome impact with high intake

Potential Health Implications and Side Effects

Both sweeteners are generally safe when consumed in moderation, but there are nuanced differences that are important for certain health conditions.

Impact on Diabetes and Blood Sugar

Because both monk fruit and highly purified stevia have a glycemic index of zero, they do not cause blood sugar spikes and are considered safe alternatives for people with diabetes. Monk fruit's mogrosides and stevia's steviol glycosides provide sweetness without affecting insulin release. However, some studies suggest that in high doses, stevia might have a slight impact on insulin secretion, though more research is needed.

Gastrointestinal Considerations

Stevia has been linked to potential digestive issues in some individuals, such as bloating, gas, or nausea, particularly when consumed in large quantities. This can be a result of the steviol glycosides or, more often, added bulking agents like sugar alcohols (e.g., erythritol) used in many commercial stevia products. Monk fruit has very few reported side effects, though it is sometimes blended with sugar alcohols as well, so reading ingredient labels is crucial.

Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Properties

Monk fruit contains mogrosides, which are antioxidants that may possess anti-inflammatory properties. This is a potential benefit that is unique to monk fruit among these two options. Some research suggests stevia may also have anti-inflammatory effects, but the antioxidant benefits of monk fruit are often highlighted in comparisons.

The Importance of Additives

A significant drawback for both sweeteners is the common inclusion of other ingredients by manufacturers. To bulk up the product or balance the flavor, brands often mix monk fruit and stevia with sugar alcohols, dextrose, or maltodextrin. Sugar alcohols can cause gastrointestinal distress, and dextrose or maltodextrin are simple sugars that will impact blood sugar levels, negating the primary benefit for diabetics. Always check labels for pure extract or ensure any additives align with your dietary goals.

Choosing the Right Sweetener for You

Ultimately, the choice between monk fruit and stevia often comes down to personal tolerance, taste preference, and budget.

  • For the cleanest flavor profile: If you dislike the bitter aftertaste associated with stevia, monk fruit is likely the better choice. Its neutral, rounded flavor is more forgiving in various recipes.
  • For the most budget-friendly option: Stevia is typically more affordable and widely available in grocery stores than monk fruit, which is often pricier to produce and import.
  • For sensitive digestive systems: Individuals prone to bloating and other GI discomfort from sugar alcohols should scrutinize ingredient lists carefully. Since monk fruit has fewer reported side effects on its own, it may be a safer bet, but pure extracts are recommended for both.
  • For those with diabetes: Both are excellent options as they do not spike blood sugar. However, vigilance regarding additional ingredients is essential.

Conclusion: So, What's Healthier, Monk Fruit or Stevia?

Both monk fruit and stevia are zero-calorie, plant-based sugar substitutes that offer a healthier alternative to refined sugar, especially for managing weight and blood sugar. When comparing them, monk fruit has a slight advantage due to its milder taste profile and lack of reported side effects, making it a more universal crowd-pleaser. Stevia, while more affordable and extensively studied, can have a bitter aftertaste and may cause mild digestive issues in some people when consumed in high amounts or with specific additives. The 'healthier' option truly depends on what your body tolerates best and your personal taste preferences. The most crucial takeaway is to opt for the purest possible form of either sweetener to avoid unwanted additives.

For more information on the safety of food additives, consider visiting the FDA's official website.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both monk fruit and highly purified stevia are excellent, zero-calorie options for diabetics as they do not raise blood sugar levels. However, it's crucial to check labels to avoid products with added sugars like dextrose.

Monk fruit has very few reported side effects. Some people may experience mild digestive issues with stevia, such as bloating or gas, often due to high consumption or the presence of added sugar alcohols in the product.

Both are zero-calorie sweeteners and can support weight loss by reducing overall calorie intake from sugar. The best choice depends on personal taste and potential digestive side effects, which might influence long-term adherence.

Stevia's bitter or metallic aftertaste is caused by its steviol glycoside compounds, which can trigger both sweet and bitter taste receptors. Many people find this unpleasant, especially at high concentrations.

Stevia is more widely available and has been on the market longer. Monk fruit is less common and often more expensive due to its cultivation and export costs.

Yes, both are heat-stable and can be used in baking. However, they do not provide the bulk or texture of sugar. Many commercial baking blends include other ingredients like erythritol to compensate, so be sure to check the label.

Both are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the FDA. However, those allergic to plants in the Asteraceae family (like ragweed or daisies) may have a reaction to stevia. As with any dietary change, consulting a healthcare provider is recommended.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.