Skip to content

What's more healthier, tuna or salmon?

3 min read

According to the American Heart Association, it's recommended to eat fish at least twice a week for its myriad health benefits. But with popular options like tuna and salmon, the choice can be confusing. So, what's more healthier, tuna or salmon?

Quick Summary

This article provides a nutritional comparison of tuna and salmon, outlining key differences in their omega-3 fatty acid, protein, and mercury content. It details the benefits and drawbacks of each fish to help you choose the best option based on your dietary needs.

Key Points

  • Omega-3s: Salmon is significantly richer in omega-3 fatty acids, which are crucial for heart and brain health.

  • Protein Content: Tuna offers a higher concentration of lean protein per serving, making it ideal for those focused on muscle gain or weight management.

  • Mercury Levels: Salmon typically has much lower mercury levels than tuna, which is an important consideration for frequent consumption, especially for pregnant women and children.

  • Vitamin D: Salmon is a superior source of Vitamin D, a nutrient vital for bone health and immune function.

  • Sustainability: Look for sustainability certifications like MSC for both types of fish to ensure responsible sourcing.

  • Varieties Matter: The nutritional profile can differ based on the species (e.g., albacore vs. skipjack tuna) and whether the fish is wild-caught or farmed.

In This Article

Tuna vs. Salmon: A Nutritional Face-Off

Both tuna and salmon are staples in healthy diets, praised for their high protein content and beneficial fats. However, their nutritional profiles have some key differences that can make one a better choice for your specific health goals. Salmon is renowned for its high omega-3 fatty acid content, while tuna offers a leaner, higher-protein option. The choice between them often comes down to weighing these factors, alongside concerns like mercury levels and calorie density.

The All-Important Omega-3s

Omega-3 fatty acids, specifically EPA and DHA, are essential fats crucial for heart and brain health, reducing inflammation, and potentially lowering the risk of chronic diseases. This is where salmon truly shines. It is a far richer source of omega-3s than most types of tuna. For instance, a 3-ounce serving of wild-caught salmon can contain over 1,000 mg of omega-3s, while the same amount of yellowfin tuna has significantly less. If your main goal is to boost your intake of these beneficial fatty acids, salmon is the clear winner.

Protein Power and Calorie Count

For those focused on lean protein and calorie control, tuna often has the edge. Tuna is a leaner fish, meaning it provides more protein per calorie than salmon. A 3-ounce serving of tuna typically has more grams of protein and fewer calories and fat than a comparable serving of salmon. This makes it an excellent choice for weight management or for building and maintaining muscle mass without a significant caloric load. Both are complete proteins, offering all nine essential amino acids.

The Mercury Concern

Mercury is a neurotoxin that can accumulate in larger, longer-living fish. Tuna, being a large predatory fish, generally contains higher levels of mercury than salmon. While levels vary by species (bigeye tuna has more mercury than skipjack or canned light tuna), this is a significant consideration, especially for vulnerable populations like pregnant women and young children who are advised to limit their intake. Salmon, including both wild-caught and farmed varieties, is known for its low mercury content, making it a safer and more frequent choice for many.

The Role of Vitamins and Minerals

Both fish are packed with essential nutrients, but their specific strengths differ. Salmon is an outstanding source of Vitamin D, which is vital for bone health and immune function. It also contains astaxanthin, a powerful antioxidant that gives the fish its pink color. Tuna, on the other hand, is particularly high in selenium and niacin (Vitamin B3). Selenium acts as a potent antioxidant, while niacin helps convert food into energy and supports circulation.

A Simple Comparison of Key Nutrients

Feature Tuna (per 3 oz) Salmon (per 3 oz)
Calories Lower (90–120 calories) Higher (170+ calories)
Protein Higher (20–25g) Slightly Lower (17–22g)
Omega-3s Lower (e.g., Yellowfin ~0.1g) Higher (e.g., Sockeye ~1.5g)
Vitamin D Moderate High
Selenium High Moderate
Mercury Higher (varies by species) Lower

Making the Best Choice for You

Ultimately, the choice between tuna and salmon depends on your individual health priorities. For optimal heart and brain health and a higher intake of omega-3s and Vitamin D with lower mercury exposure, salmon is the superior option. For a low-calorie, high-protein food to aid weight loss and muscle building, tuna is a fantastic choice. The best strategy is to incorporate a variety of fish into your diet to reap the benefits of both while mitigating the risks associated with mercury.

Conclusion: Both Offer Great Health Benefits

Neither tuna nor salmon is definitively healthier in every aspect. Both offer a trove of nutritional benefits, including high-quality protein and essential nutrients. Salmon provides more omega-3s and Vitamin D, making it excellent for heart and brain health, but comes with more calories. Tuna is a leaner, more budget-friendly source of protein but carries a higher risk of mercury, necessitating moderation. By alternating between the two and opting for lower-mercury tuna varieties like skipjack, you can achieve a balanced, nutrient-rich diet. For further guidance on fish consumption, consult reputable sources like the American Heart Association to ensure you are meeting recommendations safely.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tuna is often considered better for weight loss because it is leaner and higher in protein per calorie than salmon. The high protein content can increase satiety and help reduce overall calorie intake.

Salmon consistently has a higher omega-3 fatty acid content than tuna. This makes it a superior choice for supporting heart and brain health.

Salmon is generally safer in terms of mercury content. As a larger predatory fish, tuna tends to accumulate more mercury. It is recommended to choose lower-mercury options like canned light tuna and consume it in moderation.

Both farmed and wild-caught salmon are good sources of omega-3s, but wild-caught salmon may have a slightly higher nutritional value and lower exposure to contaminants. For canned varieties, they have similar nutritional benefits.

Due to mercury content, it is generally recommended to limit tuna consumption. The FDA suggests limiting canned albacore to one serving per week and light tuna to two servings per week.

A key health benefit of eating salmon is its high concentration of omega-3 fatty acids, which are essential for heart, brain, and joint health.

Canned tuna is typically more affordable and shelf-stable than salmon, making it a budget-friendly option for adding protein and some omega-3s to your diet.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.