Understanding Differential Reinforcement
Differential Reinforcement is a fundamental principle within Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) that focuses on increasing desired behaviors while decreasing undesired ones by managing reinforcement. Instead of simply punishing a problem behavior, these methods teach individuals a more appropriate way to achieve the same outcome. The procedure involves providing reinforcement for a specific, appropriate behavior while withholding reinforcement for the problem behavior. Two of the most common forms of differential reinforcement are DRA and DRI, each with a distinct approach to achieving behavioral change.
What is DRA (Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior)?
DRA focuses on reinforcing a behavior that serves the same function as the undesired behavior but is more appropriate or socially acceptable. The alternative behavior does not need to be physically incompatible with the problem behavior; it simply needs to be a more suitable replacement that meets the individual's underlying need. For example, if a child screams to get attention from a parent, a DRA procedure would involve teaching the child to politely tap the parent on the shoulder instead. The therapist or parent would then praise or provide attention when the child taps their shoulder while ignoring the screaming. The goal is to replace a problem behavior with a functional, constructive alternative.
Characteristics of DRA:
- Focus: Teaches a specific, functional replacement behavior.
- Method: Reinforce the alternative behavior and ignore the problem behavior.
- Application: Ideal for behaviors driven by a specific function, such as seeking attention, access to items, or escaping a task.
- Outcome: The individual learns a more socially acceptable way to communicate their needs.
What is DRI (Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior)?
DRI involves reinforcing a behavior that is physically impossible to perform at the same time as the problem behavior. This technique is a subset of DRA, but with the added constraint that the reinforced behavior and the target behavior cannot coexist. By rewarding the incompatible behavior, you effectively prevent the problem behavior from occurring simultaneously. For example, if a student frequently leaves their seat in a classroom, a teacher could implement DRI by rewarding them with a token every five minutes they remain seated. Sitting quietly is incompatible with walking around the room. This makes DRI a powerful and direct way to suppress unwanted actions.
Characteristics of DRI:
- Focus: Prevents the problem behavior by reinforcing a physically exclusive action.
- Method: Reinforce a behavior that makes the problem behavior physically impossible.
- Application: Best for situations where the goal is to completely stop a specific physical action, like self-harm or aggression.
- Outcome: The individual engages in a positive behavior that makes the undesirable one impossible.
Key Differences Between DRA and DRI
While both DRA and DRI are powerful tools within ABA, their key distinction lies in the relationship between the target and replacement behaviors. DRA focuses on an alternative behavior that serves the same purpose, whereas DRI mandates a physically incompatible behavior.
| Feature | DRA (Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior) | DRI (Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior) |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship of Behaviors | The new behavior serves the same function but is not necessarily physically incompatible with the old one. | The new behavior is physically impossible to do at the same time as the old one. |
| Primary Goal | To replace an undesired behavior with a more appropriate alternative that meets the same need. | To prevent the occurrence of an undesired behavior by reinforcing a physically conflicting action. |
| Example | A child who shouts for attention is praised for asking politely. | A child who runs around the room is praised for sitting quietly. |
| Flexibility | More flexible, as the replacement can be any suitable alternative. | More restrictive, as the replacement must be physically incompatible. |
| Ease of Implementation | Can be easier to implement if the function is clear and an acceptable alternative is readily available. | Can be straightforward if a clear incompatible behavior exists, but may be limited in scope. |
How to Choose Between DRA and DRI
Choosing the right technique depends on a functional behavior assessment (FBA) to determine the purpose of the unwanted behavior. If the function is clear and an appropriate replacement can be taught, DRA is often the go-to strategy. For example, if a child throws toys to get attention, teaching them to ask for attention nicely is a DRA approach. However, if the behavior is physically driven, such as self-harm like hand-flapping, DRI is more effective. Reinforcing a child for holding a toy or putting their hands in their pockets makes the hand-flapping impossible. The decision tree often follows these steps:
- Conduct an FBA: Identify the antecedent (trigger) and consequence (reinforcement) of the problem behavior.
- Determine Function: What is the individual trying to achieve with this behavior? (e.g., escape, attention, access to tangibles).
- Identify Alternatives: Can an appropriate alternative behavior serve the same function? If so, DRA is a strong option.
- Identify Incompatible Behavior: Can a physically incompatible behavior be reinforced to prevent the problem behavior? If so, DRI may be more direct.
- Consider Both: In some cases, a combination of strategies may be appropriate.
Conclusion
DRA and DRI are both effective, positive behavior modification techniques that are crucial for practitioners and caregivers in ABA. The fundamental difference lies in the nature of the replacement behavior that is reinforced. DRA focuses on providing a functional alternative, whereas DRI reinforces a behavior that is physically incompatible with the problem behavior. By carefully assessing the function of the undesired behavior, one can strategically apply the correct differential reinforcement procedure to promote long-lasting, positive change. Consistent and immediate reinforcement is the key to successfully implementing either strategy.
For a deeper understanding of the scientific foundations of these methods and related concepts like the estimated average requirement (EAR) or adequate intake (AI) in a broader context, authoritative resources are invaluable. You can explore a broader set of nutrient reference values by visiting the National Institutes of Health.(https://ods.od.nih.gov/HealthInformation/nutrientrecommendations.aspx)
