Skip to content

What's the Difference Between Enteral and Parenteral Feeding? A Complete Guide

4 min read

Approximately 25% of hospitalized patients may require some form of nutritional support, highlighting its critical role in patient care. Understanding what's the difference between enteral and parenteral feeding is crucial for medical professionals and patients to determine the safest and most effective approach.

Quick Summary

This article clarifies the fundamental distinction between enteral and parenteral feeding, detailing how the former uses a functional GI tract while the latter bypasses it entirely via intravenous delivery.

Key Points

  • Route of Administration: Enteral feeding delivers nutrition via the GI tract (e.g., stomach, small intestine), while parenteral feeding delivers it directly into the bloodstream intravenously.

  • GI Tract Functionality: Enteral nutrition requires a working GI tract; parenteral nutrition is necessary when the GI tract is non-functional or inaccessible.

  • Risk of Complications: Parenteral feeding carries a higher risk of serious complications, including infections and metabolic issues, compared to enteral feeding.

  • Cost and Complexity: Enteral feeding is generally simpler, less invasive, and more cost-effective than parenteral feeding, which requires specialized preparation and sterile procedures.

  • Patient Outcomes: If possible, enteral feeding is preferred due to its lower cost, reduced risk of complications, and ability to maintain gut integrity, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.

In This Article

What is Enteral Feeding?

Enteral feeding, or tube feeding, refers to any method of providing nutrition that uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This approach is used for patients who have a functioning digestive system but are unable to ingest enough nutrients orally to meet their metabolic needs. The nutrients are delivered in a liquid formula through a tube inserted into the stomach or small intestine.

Common Types of Enteral Feeding Tubes

  • Nasogastric (NG) Tube: A tube is passed through the nose and into the stomach. It is typically used for short-term feeding, usually for less than four to six weeks.
  • Gastrostomy (G) Tube or Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG): A tube is surgically or endoscopically inserted directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall. This is a common method for long-term feeding.
  • Jejunostomy (J) Tube or Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy (PEJ): The tube is placed directly into the jejunum, the middle part of the small intestine. This is used when the stomach is not suitable for feeding.
  • Nasojejunal (NJ) or Nasoduodenal (ND) Tube: A tube is passed through the nose into the small intestine (jejunum or duodenum). These are used when gastric emptying is an issue.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Enteral Feeding

Advantages:

  • More physiological and safer than parenteral nutrition.
  • Maintains the structure and function of the gut.
  • Associated with a lower risk of serious infections.
  • Less expensive than parenteral nutrition.

Disadvantages:

  • Potential for aspiration pneumonia.
  • Risk of tube clogging or dislodgment.
  • Can cause gastrointestinal complications like diarrhea, nausea, and bloating.
  • Requires a functional GI tract.

What is Parenteral Feeding?

Parenteral feeding, often called Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN), involves delivering nutrients directly into the bloodstream through an intravenous (IV) catheter. This method completely bypasses the digestive system and is used when a patient's GI tract is non-functional or requires complete rest. The nutrient solution is a custom-mixed formula containing carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals.

Types of Parenteral Nutrition

  • Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN): Supplies all of a patient's nutritional needs intravenously. It typically uses a central venous catheter for access to a large vein, which can handle the high concentration of the solution.
  • Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN): Provides supplemental nutrition through a peripheral vein, usually in the arm. The solution is less concentrated and is only suitable for short-term use or when supplementing other forms of feeding.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Parenteral Feeding

Advantages:

  • Provides complete nutrition when the gut is not functional.
  • Allows the digestive system to heal completely.
  • Can be lifesaving for patients with severe malabsorption or other GI disorders.

Disadvantages:

  • Higher risk of serious complications, including catheter-related infections, sepsis, and blood clots.
  • Can lead to metabolic complications like blood sugar imbalances and liver disease.
  • More invasive and expensive than enteral feeding.
  • Long-term use can cause the gut to atrophy.

Enteral vs. Parenteral Feeding: A Comparison

To highlight the fundamental differences, here is a side-by-side comparison of enteral and parenteral nutrition.

Feature Enteral Feeding Parenteral Feeding
Route Via a tube into the stomach or small intestine Intravenously (directly into the bloodstream)
GI Tract Involvement Requires a functional or accessible GI tract Bypasses the GI tract entirely
Indications Inability to swallow, oral/esophageal tumors, neurological disorders Non-functional GI tract, severe malabsorption, bowel obstruction, fistulas
Physiology More natural, mimics normal digestion and absorption Less natural, directly introduces nutrients into circulation
Complication Risk Lower risk of infection, but potential for aspiration, GI distress Higher risk of systemic infections, metabolic issues, blood clots
Cost Less expensive Significantly more expensive
Gut Health Preserves gut function and integrity Can lead to gut atrophy over time

The Choice Between Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition

For patients who cannot eat, enteral feeding is the preferred route whenever the GI tract is functioning and accessible. Evidence suggests that enteral nutrition is associated with better outcomes, including shorter hospital stays and a lower incidence of severe complications, especially in malnourished patients. Parenteral nutrition is reserved for situations where the gut is not working or needs to be completely rested.

In some cases, a combined approach is used, especially in critically ill patients, to reach nutritional goals more quickly. The strategy might involve starting both simultaneously or using parenteral nutrition to supplement enteral feeding when full nutritional targets are not met.

Summary of Clinical Guidelines

  • Prioritize the Gut: Medical guidelines strongly recommend using the enteral route first, if at all possible.
  • Early Intervention: Early enteral feeding, often started within 24-48 hours of admission for critically ill patients, is recommended to prevent gut atrophy and other complications.
  • Consider Patient Tolerance: If a patient is intolerant to enteral feeding (e.g., experiencing severe nausea or diarrhea), a switch to or supplement with parenteral nutrition may be necessary.

Conclusion

Understanding what's the difference between enteral and parenteral feeding is fundamental to clinical nutrition. Enteral feeding utilizes a functional digestive system via tubes, is more physiological, and generally safer and less expensive. Parenteral feeding bypasses the digestive tract entirely and delivers nutrients intravenously, making it a critical, though riskier and more costly, option for patients with non-functional guts. While enteral feeding is the preferred first-line therapy, a patient's underlying condition and tolerance will ultimately dictate the most appropriate and beneficial nutritional strategy. For more detailed information on specific medical treatments, consult reliable health resources like the Cleveland Clinic.

When is each type of feeding used?

  • Enteral Feeding is used for patients who cannot eat or swallow safely but have a functional digestive system, such as those with neurological disorders affecting swallowing, head and neck cancers, or severe anorexia.
  • Parenteral Feeding is used when the digestive system is not working correctly or needs to be rested, such as in cases of severe Crohn's disease, short bowel syndrome, or bowel obstruction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Enteral feeding is chosen for patients who cannot safely ingest enough nutrition orally, such as those with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) or conditions preventing adequate food intake, but whose GI tract is still functioning.

Parenteral feeding becomes necessary when a patient's GI tract cannot digest or absorb nutrients properly due to severe malabsorption, bowel obstruction, or when the gut needs complete rest to heal.

Enteral feeding is considered safer, more physiological, and is associated with fewer severe complications, such as blood infections, compared to parenteral nutrition.

Yes, a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition is sometimes used, especially in critically ill patients, to help achieve nutritional goals. This is called supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN).

Parenteral nutrition has a higher risk profile, including serious infections related to the IV catheter, metabolic imbalances (e.g., blood sugar issues), blood clots, and potential liver disease with long-term use.

Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) provides all nutritional needs through a central IV line, while Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN) provides partial, less concentrated nutrition via a smaller peripheral vein.

Yes, while safer overall, enteral feeding can lead to risks such as aspiration pneumonia, tube clogging or dislodgment, and gastrointestinal discomfort like diarrhea or nausea.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.