The Simple Answer: It Depends on the Species
Determining whether mackerel or tuna has less mercury is not a straightforward 'either-or' question; the answer is highly dependent on the specific species and its size. A fundamental principle of mercury accumulation in seafood is bioaccumulation, the process by which a substance like mercury accumulates in an organism. This means larger, older, and more predatory fish tend to have higher concentrations of mercury because they eat other, smaller fish that have already accumulated some mercury. Therefore, smaller species of fish, which are lower on the food chain, typically contain less mercury. As we will see, this principle is crucial when comparing the two fish families.
Mercury Content: Mackerel vs. Tuna Breakdown
The mercury levels in mackerel and tuna vary widely across their different species and preparation methods.
Mackerel Species and Mercury
While the mackerel family includes some of the highest-mercury fish, it also offers some of the lowest.
- Atlantic Mackerel: Considered a "Best Choice" by the FDA and EPA for its very low mercury content. A small, fast-growing fish, it is a safe, omega-3 rich option for regular consumption.
- Chub Mackerel (Pacific Mackerel): Also a low-mercury option and listed as a "Best Choice".
- King Mackerel: This species is a major exception and should be avoided, especially by pregnant women and young children, due to its high mercury levels. Its larger size and longer lifespan allow for significant mercury accumulation.
- Spanish Mackerel: Categorized as a "Good Choice" by the FDA, meaning it has moderate mercury levels and consumption should be limited.
Tuna Species and Mercury
Tuna species also show a broad range of mercury levels, from low to high.
- Canned Light Tuna (Skipjack): A "Best Choice" for its low mercury content, making it safe to eat up to two or three servings per week. Most canned "light" tuna is made from smaller skipjack tuna.
- Albacore Tuna: Often called "white" tuna, albacore has higher mercury levels than canned light tuna. The FDA lists it as a "Good Choice" but recommends limiting consumption, especially for sensitive populations.
- Bigeye Tuna: This large species has some of the highest mercury levels among tuna and is classified as a "Choice to Avoid" by the FDA due to its potential health risks. It is typically found fresh or frozen rather than in cans.
- Yellowfin Tuna: Categorized as a "Good Choice," yellowfin has moderate mercury levels, placing it between canned light and albacore tuna.
Nutritional Comparison Beyond Mercury
While mercury is a key concern, it's also worth noting the other nutritional aspects of these fish.
- Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Mackerel is an oily fish and generally contains significantly higher levels of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids than tuna. A 3.5-ounce serving of mackerel can have over 4,000 mg of omega-3s, while tuna offers a more modest amount.
- Protein: Both are excellent sources of protein. However, tuna tends to be leaner, with a higher protein-to-fat ratio than mackerel.
- Vitamins and Minerals: Both fish offer a range of essential nutrients, including vitamin D and B12. Mackerel is particularly high in vitamin B12, while tuna offers more selenium and phosphorus.
Safe Fish Selection Tips
When choosing seafood, a few practical tips can help you minimize mercury exposure:
- Favor Smaller Species: The golden rule is to choose smaller, younger fish that are lower on the food chain, as they accumulate less mercury.
- Diversify Your Choices: Instead of eating the same type of fish repeatedly, vary your seafood consumption to reduce exposure from a single source. The FDA/EPA recommends eating a variety of fish from the "Best Choices" list.
- Consult Advisories: Pay attention to local and national fish consumption advisories, which provide guidance based on the latest data. You can find official guidance on the FDA/EPA advice about eating fish website.
Mackerel vs. Tuna: Mercury and Nutrients Comparison Table
| Feature | Atlantic Mackerel (Best Choice) | Canned Light Tuna (Best Choice) | Albacore/Yellowfin Tuna (Good Choice) | King Mackerel/Bigeye Tuna (Avoid) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury Level | Very Low | Low | Moderate | Very High |
| FDA/EPA Rating | Best Choice | Best Choice | Good Choice | Choice to Avoid |
| Omega-3s | Very High | Moderate | Moderate | High |
| Protein | High | High | Very High | High |
| Typical Size | Small | Small to medium (Skipjack) | Medium to large | Very large |
| Consumption Limit | 2-3 servings/week+ | 2-3 servings/week+ | 1 serving/week (sensitive pop.) | Avoid |
Conclusion: Making the Safest Choice
For individuals seeking the lowest mercury levels, the choice between mackerel and tuna depends entirely on the specific variety. Smaller mackerel species, such as Atlantic or Chub mackerel, are consistently rated as low-mercury options and are nutritionally dense. Similarly, canned light tuna, typically sourced from skipjack tuna, offers a low-mercury, convenient alternative. However, larger, long-lived tuna species like bigeye and king mackerel should be limited or avoided due to their high mercury content, especially by at-risk groups like pregnant women, nursing mothers, and young children. By focusing on smaller species and varying your fish intake, you can confidently enjoy the significant health benefits of seafood while minimizing mercury exposure.