Skip to content

Which is safer, stevia or monk fruit sweetener? A definitive nutrition diet guide

4 min read

With more consumers shifting away from sugar, the demand for natural, zero-calorie alternatives like stevia and monk fruit has surged. However, a key question for those focused on a nutrition diet remains: which is safer, stevia or monk fruit sweetener?

Quick Summary

Stevia and monk fruit are zero-calorie, plant-derived sweeteners generally recognized as safe by the FDA in their purified forms. Monk fruit has no known side effects, while stevia may cause minor digestive issues in sensitive individuals. The best choice depends largely on taste preference and budget.

Key Points

  • FDA Approval: Both purified stevia extracts and monk fruit mogrosides are classified as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) by the FDA.

  • Safety Profile: Monk fruit has no known side effects, whereas stevia can cause minor digestive issues like bloating in some individuals.

  • Taste: Monk fruit offers a clean, sugar-like taste with little to no aftertaste, while stevia can have a bitter or metallic aftertaste for some people.

  • Additives: Be mindful of added ingredients like erythritol, dextrose, or maltodextrin in both stevia and monk fruit products, as these can affect blood sugar or cause digestive discomfort.

  • Cost: Monk fruit is typically more expensive than stevia due to its more complex sourcing and processing.

  • Best Choice: Your ideal sweetener depends on your taste tolerance and budget, but monk fruit is often considered a cleaner, safer option overall due to fewer reported side effects.

In This Article

The Rise of Natural Sweeteners

In the ongoing effort to reduce sugar intake and improve metabolic health, many people turn to natural, zero-calorie sweeteners. Stevia and monk fruit have become the most popular choices in this category, valued for their plant-based origins and minimal impact on blood sugar levels. Yet, despite their similarities, a closer look at their safety profiles, processing, and potential side effects reveals important differences. Understanding these nuances is crucial for making an informed decision that aligns with your health goals.

Stevia: The South American Sweetener

Derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, stevia has been used for centuries in South America. The sweet compounds, called steviol glycosides, are extracted and purified to create the commercial sweetener. While the crude, whole-leaf form is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to insufficient toxicological data, the highly purified steviol glycoside extracts are classified as "Generally Recognized as Safe" (GRAS).

Potential Stevia Side Effects and Considerations

Despite its GRAS status, some individuals report adverse effects from consuming stevia:

  • Taste Profile: A common complaint is a lingering, somewhat bitter or metallic aftertaste, especially when used in larger quantities or in baking. The specific steviol glycosides used in the extract can influence the intensity of this aftertaste.
  • Digestive Discomfort: Certain stevia products are blended with sugar alcohols, such as erythritol, to add bulk and improve taste. In sensitive individuals, these sugar alcohols can cause gas, bloating, and stomach cramping.
  • Endocrine and Gut Health: Limited animal studies have raised theoretical concerns about stevia's potential to act as an endocrine disruptor or negatively impact the gut microbiome. However, human studies are less conclusive, and more research is needed to understand the long-term effects.
  • Allergic Reactions: Although rare, people with allergies to plants in the Asteraceae family (including ragweed, daisies, and sunflowers) may have an allergic reaction to stevia.

Monk Fruit: The Asian Alternative

Also known as Luo Han Guo, monk fruit is a small, round fruit native to Southern China. Its intense sweetness comes from compounds called mogrosides, which are powerful antioxidants. After harvesting, the fruit is crushed, and the mogroside extract is isolated, resulting in a zero-calorie sweetener. Monk fruit extract was granted GRAS status by the FDA in 2010 and has been used safely in China for centuries.

Monk Fruit: A Cleaner Safety Record

Monk fruit is often highlighted for its clean safety record with no known side effects from consumption.

  • No Known Side Effects: To date, there is no evidence of adverse effects associated with monk fruit extract, even in large doses tested in animal studies.
  • Cleaner Taste: Unlike stevia, monk fruit is generally praised for its clean, sugar-like taste with a minimal or non-existent aftertaste.
  • Potential Health Benefits: The mogrosides in monk fruit are antioxidants, which have been studied for their potential anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties.
  • Allergies: While very uncommon, allergic reactions are possible if a person is also allergic to other gourds in the Cucurbitaceae family, such as cucumbers and melons.

The Additive Factor

When evaluating the safety of any zero-calorie sweetener, it is critical to look beyond the primary ingredient. Both stevia and monk fruit are often blended with other ingredients to improve their taste, texture, and stability. Common additives include sugar alcohols like erythritol or bulking agents like maltodextrin and dextrose. These additional ingredients can affect blood sugar levels, caloric content, and lead to digestive upset. Always read the ingredient label to ensure the product aligns with your dietary needs and health goals, especially if you are managing diabetes or a ketogenic diet.

Monk Fruit vs. Stevia: A Comparison Table

Feature Stevia (Purified Extract) Monk Fruit (Purified Extract)
Origin Stevia rebaudiana plant (South America) Siraitia grosvenorii fruit (China)
FDA Status GRAS for purified steviol glycosides GRAS for mogrosides
Safety Record Minor reported issues like digestive upset and potential aftertaste No known side effects, excellent safety record
Aftertaste Some find a lingering bitter or metallic aftertaste Minimal to no aftertaste, clean flavor
Taste Profile Very sweet, can have a licorice-like undertone Clean, sugar-like, and sometimes fruity
Cost Generally more affordable than monk fruit Often more expensive due to complex sourcing
Availability Widely available in various forms Becoming more common but less widespread
Antioxidants Contains some antioxidants Mogrosides are powerful antioxidants

Final Verdict: Which is Safer?

For most people, both highly purified stevia and monk fruit sweeteners are safe, zero-calorie alternatives to sugar, as affirmed by the FDA. However, monk fruit often holds a slight edge in terms of perceived safety due to its clean track record and lack of reported side effects. It also tends to be preferred for its neutral taste. Stevia is a safe and reliable option as well, particularly for those not sensitive to its taste or potential mild digestive effects. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your personal taste preferences and your body's individual tolerance. It is always wise to choose products with minimal additives and consume any sweetener in moderation as part of a balanced diet. For more information on the FDA's stance, you can visit their resource on High-Intensity Sweeteners.

The Importance of Moderation

While these natural sweeteners offer a compelling way to reduce sugar intake, it is important to remember that they are not a silver bullet. Excessive consumption of any sweetener can perpetuate a reliance on overly sweet tastes. The healthiest approach is to slowly retrain your palate to enjoy the natural flavors of food with less added sweetness. Use stevia or monk fruit sparingly to enhance, rather than dominate, your meals and beverages. By combining these smart sweetener choices with a whole-foods-focused diet, regular exercise, and adequate sleep, you can achieve a truly healthy and balanced lifestyle.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both highly purified stevia and monk fruit are zero-calorie and do not affect blood sugar levels, making them safe choices for people with diabetes. Always check the product label for added sugars or bulking agents like dextrose that could impact blood glucose.

The aftertaste is often caused by specific compounds called steviol glycosides within the stevia plant extract. While some processing aims to reduce this, individuals' taste receptors can perceive bitterness differently.

No, the FDA has not approved whole-leaf stevia or crude stevia extracts for use as sweeteners due to insufficient safety data, though it can be used as a dietary supplement.

There are no known adverse side effects associated with monk fruit extract. Allergic reactions are extremely rare, but possible if you are sensitive to other members of the gourd family, such as pumpkins or cucumbers.

Yes, both stevia and monk fruit sweeteners are heat-stable and can be used in baking and cooking. However, they lack the bulk of sugar, so texture and browning may be affected. Many baking blends contain additional ingredients to compensate for this.

Monk fruit is typically more expensive because the fruit is difficult to grow, harvest, and process. It is grown primarily in Southern China, making export and manufacturing costs higher.

Always check the ingredient list for fillers and sugar alcohols like erythritol, dextrose, or maltodextrin. Opt for products with pure monk fruit or stevia extract to avoid potential side effects from additives.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.