Skip to content

Which is safer sucralose or stevia? A Comprehensive Health Comparison

7 min read

The global market for sugar substitutes is thriving, yet a 2023 WHO alert concerning non-sugar sweeteners has amplified health concerns for many consumers. This has led many to critically re-evaluate their choices, with a central question emerging: which is safer, sucralose or stevia?

Quick Summary

Sucralose is an artificial sweetener facing increasing scrutiny for its potential impact on gut health and metabolism. Stevia, when highly purified, is plant-derived and generally considered safe, although less refined forms are not FDA-approved.

Key Points

  • Sucralose is a chlorinated sugar: A synthetic sweetener with recent research suggesting potential risks for gut and metabolic health.

  • Stevia is a natural plant extract: Only highly purified steviol glycoside extracts are approved and considered safe, while crude forms are not.

  • Heating risks differ: Sucralose is unstable at high temperatures and can form toxic compounds, unlike heat-stable stevia.

  • Impact on gut health varies: Studies indicate sucralose may disrupt the gut microbiome, whereas purified stevia appears less problematic.

  • Metabolic effects are debated: While both are zero-calorie, some evidence links sucralose to insulin sensitivity issues, while stevia shows more consistent neutral or beneficial effects.

  • Moderation is key: Both sweeteners should be consumed in moderation, and individuals should be aware of potential side effects and additives in blended products.

In This Article

What is Sucralose?

Sucralose is a zero-calorie artificial sweetener most commonly known by the brand name Splenda. It is derived from a modified sucrose (table sugar) molecule, but is processed by replacing three hydroxyl groups with chlorine atoms. This chemical modification makes sucralose about 600 times sweeter than sugar and prevents the body from metabolizing it for calories. It was discovered in 1976 and was first approved by the FDA for use in the US in 1998, with more than 110 studies supporting its initial approval. Despite decades of use, recent research has raised significant concerns about its long-term effects on human health, leading to a recent reevaluation by major health organizations.

Potential Health Concerns with Sucralose

  • Gut Microbiome Disruption: A growing body of research, including human clinical trials and animal studies, suggests that sucralose can negatively impact the balance of the gut microbiome. Animal studies indicate that even at low doses, sucralose can reduce the abundance of beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, while increasing potentially pathogenic families like Enterobacteriaceae. These changes could affect metabolic responses and overall gut health.
  • Metabolic Effects: While often recommended for blood sugar management, some studies have found conflicting results regarding sucralose's impact on insulin sensitivity. Several studies in healthy individuals have shown that consuming sucralose can increase insulin resistance and alter glucose levels. The activation of sweet taste receptors in the gut by sucralose may also increase insulin secretion, potentially disrupting glucose homeostasis over time.
  • Heating Risks: One of the most serious concerns for sucralose relates to its instability at high temperatures. Research indicates that when heated above 119°C (246°F), sucralose can begin to decompose and interact with other ingredients like fats and glycerol, potentially creating harmful chlorinated compounds, including carcinogenic dioxin-like compounds. This makes it a less safe option for baking or high-temperature cooking compared to other sweeteners.
  • Drug Interaction: Elevated levels of certain enzymes associated with drug metabolism have been observed with sucralose consumption in animal studies. These enzymes, like cytochrome P-450, can affect how the body processes and absorbs certain medications, potentially reducing their effectiveness.

What is Stevia?

Stevia is a non-nutritive sweetener derived from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant, native to South America. Its sweetness comes from compounds called steviol glycosides. The safety of stevia depends heavily on its form. The FDA and other major health bodies only recognize highly purified steviol glycoside extracts (containing at least 95% steviol glycosides) as safe for consumption, earning them a 'Generally Recognized as Safe' (GRAS) status. Raw stevia leaf or crude stevia extracts are not approved due to insufficient safety data.

Potential Side Effects of Stevia

Purified stevia is generally considered safe for most people and is not known to cause the same level of metabolic disruption as sucralose. However, some considerations remain:

  • Additives in Blends: Many retail stevia products are blends that include other sweeteners, like erythritol, and fillers. These additives, particularly sugar alcohols, can cause gastrointestinal symptoms like bloating, gas, and digestive discomfort in some individuals.
  • Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar Interactions: As a vasodilator, purified stevia has been shown to lower blood pressure in some studies, which could be a concern for individuals with consistently low blood pressure or those taking blood pressure medication. Similarly, its ability to lower blood sugar in diabetics means it could interact with diabetes medication, potentially causing blood sugar to drop too low.
  • Limited Long-Term Human Data: While initial studies are promising, more long-term clinical trials are still needed to fully understand the effects of stevia, especially concerning its impact on blood sugar regulation and insulin sensitivity in obese individuals.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Sucralose vs. Stevia

Feature Sucralose Highly Purified Stevia
Origin Artificial (Modified sucrose molecule) Natural (Extracted from Stevia plant leaves)
Processing Multi-step chemical process Extracted, filtered, and purified from plant leaves
Approval Status FDA-approved as a food additive since 1998 GRAS status for high-purity extracts only
Heat Stability Unstable at high temperatures; can form potentially harmful compounds Heat-stable and suitable for baking
Gut Health Impact Emerging evidence links it to gut microbiome dysbiosis Generally not disruptive to gut microbiota
Blood Sugar Impact Mixed results; some evidence suggests potential negative effects on insulin sensitivity Does not raise blood sugar; some studies suggest benefits for glucose control
Controversies WHO alert, gut health concerns, heating risks Less refined forms are not approved; taste can be an issue

Which is safer sucralose or stevia? Understanding the Long-Term Picture

Evaluating the safety of sucralose and stevia requires more than just noting their regulatory approvals. The landscape of nutritional science is constantly evolving, and what was once considered unequivocally safe is now being viewed with a more critical lens, as evidenced by the 2023 WHO alert.

The most significant differentiator appears to be the impact on long-term health, particularly the gut microbiome and metabolic function. Sucralose's artificial nature and documented potential to alter gut bacteria and influence insulin sensitivity raise more concerns based on recent evidence. Its heat instability is another major drawback for anyone who uses sweeteners in cooking or baking, introducing the risk of toxic compound formation.

In contrast, highly purified stevia, with its natural plant origin and favorable metabolic profile in most studies, appears to be the safer option. It does not cause the same gut disruption and is heat-stable. However, consumers must remain vigilant by choosing reputable brands and reading labels to ensure they are getting a high-purity extract and not a blend with potentially problematic additives. As with any food additive, moderation is key, and individual health conditions should always be considered in consultation with a healthcare provider.

Conclusion

While both sucralose and purified stevia are zero-calorie sugar substitutes approved for consumption, their safety profiles are not identical. Emerging scientific research points to more potential long-term risks associated with sucralose, particularly concerning gut health, metabolism, and heating instability. In comparison, highly purified stevia, derived from a natural plant source, shows a more benign metabolic profile and does not pose the same risks when heated. Therefore, for most people seeking a safer, zero-calorie sweetener, highly purified stevia is the more advisable choice. Nonetheless, consulting a doctor is recommended for individuals with underlying health conditions, and moderation is always the best approach.

Source:

Unveiling the profound influence of sucralose on metabolism and its controversial association with human health - NIH

Potential side effects to be aware of include:

  • Sucralose's impact on gut health: Studies suggest sucralose can reduce beneficial gut bacteria, potentially leading to dysbiosis and impacting metabolic health.
  • Stevia's potential digestive issues: Some stevia products contain sugar alcohols which can cause bloating and gas in sensitive individuals.
  • Sucralose's heating instability: Heating sucralose above 119°C can cause it to break down and form potentially toxic chlorinated compounds.
  • Stevia's effect on blood pressure: Stevia can act as a vasodilator, potentially causing issues for those with low blood pressure or on medication.
  • Different forms of stevia: The FDA has only approved high-purity steviol glycoside extracts; crude stevia leaf extracts lack sufficient safety data.

Comparison between Sucralose and Stevia

  • Source: Stevia is a natural sweetener from the Stevia rebaudiana plant, whereas sucralose is an artificial, chemically-modified sucrose molecule.
  • Safety Profile: Highly purified stevia is generally regarded as safe (GRAS), while sucralose's safety is facing increased scrutiny due to emerging research on its long-term effects.
  • Impact on Gut Microbiome: Research indicates that sucralose may cause gut dysbiosis, while purified stevia appears to have minimal impact.
  • Metabolic Effects: Some studies suggest sucralose can negatively affect insulin sensitivity, whereas stevia has shown potential benefits for glucose control.
  • Baking and Heating: Sucralose can form toxic compounds when heated at high temperatures, making it a poor choice for baking; stevia is heat-stable.
  • Additives: Stevia products may contain sugar alcohols that cause digestive issues, so checking labels is important.

Is sucralose or stevia better for managing blood sugar levels?

Stevia is often considered better for managing blood sugar levels because it has a minimal impact on blood glucose and insulin. Some studies even suggest it could improve insulin sensitivity. In contrast, some research on sucralose has shown conflicting results, with certain studies linking it to reduced insulin sensitivity.

Can I use stevia for baking?

Yes, you can use stevia for baking, as it is heat-stable and does not break down into potentially toxic compounds like sucralose can. However, stevia does not caramelize, so it may not be a perfect 1:1 substitute for sugar in all recipes, especially those where browning or structure is important.

Why is crude or whole-leaf stevia not approved by the FDA?

The FDA has not approved crude or whole-leaf stevia extracts because there is a lack of sufficient toxicological data to establish their safety. Only highly purified steviol glycoside extracts have been approved as safe for consumption.

What does the recent WHO alert about sweeteners mean for sucralose and stevia?

The 2023 WHO alert recommended against using non-sugar sweeteners for weight control due to potential long-term health risks. While this covers both, the scientific community is now more aware of potential issues, particularly with artificial sweeteners like sucralose, highlighting the importance of ongoing research and moderation.

Is sucralose worse than other artificial sweeteners?

Research suggests that some artificial sweeteners, including sucralose, may negatively impact gut health and metabolic function, challenging previous assumptions of their complete harmlessness. Comparisons with other sweeteners like aspartame often have mixed results and depend on the specific health outcome and duration of use being studied.

Which sweetener is better for gut health?

Based on current evidence, purified stevia appears to be better for gut health than sucralose. Studies show sucralose can negatively alter gut bacteria composition, whereas purified stevia is generally not disruptive to the gut microbiome.

Should I avoid sucralose and stevia if I'm pregnant?

It is generally recommended to use caution with any sweetener during pregnancy. While highly purified stevia extracts are generally considered safe at low doses, some common additives in blends should be avoided, and more data is needed. It's best to consult a healthcare provider for personalized advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Stevia is generally considered better for blood sugar management, as it consistently shows a minimal impact on glucose and insulin levels. In contrast, some research suggests sucralose could negatively affect insulin sensitivity over time.

No, sucralose is not considered safe for high-temperature baking. Studies show that when heated above 119°C (246°F), it can decompose and form potentially harmful chlorinated compounds.

The FDA has not approved crude or whole-leaf stevia extracts because there is insufficient toxicological data to establish their safety. Only high-purity steviol glycoside extracts are approved.

Emerging research indicates that sucralose may disrupt the balance of the gut microbiome by affecting beneficial bacteria. In contrast, purified stevia appears to be less disruptive to gut microbiota.

Yes, some side effects are possible. Sucralose has been linked to potential gut issues and metabolic changes. Certain stevia products containing sugar alcohols can cause digestive issues like bloating and gas in some people. Both can have effects related to blood pressure or blood sugar in sensitive individuals.

Yes, there is a notable taste difference. Sucralose offers a clean, sugar-like taste. Stevia, particularly in some forms, can have a mild, licorice-like or slightly bitter aftertaste that some people find unappealing.

While highly purified stevia is generally considered safe at low doses, it is best to consult a healthcare provider for advice before consuming any sweetener during pregnancy, as more research is needed.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.