Skip to content

Which two of the following are indicators of enteral nutrition? Identifying the Need for Tube Feeding

2 min read

In many hospital settings, enteral nutrition (EN) is the most common form of nutritional support, preferred over intravenous feeding when the digestive system is functional. Identifying the right candidates for this intervention is crucial, and two key clinical factors are often the primary drivers for this decision. This article examines the core indicators that help healthcare providers answer the question, "Which two of the following are indicators of enteral nutrition?"

Quick Summary

This article discusses the primary reasons patients may require enteral nutrition. It explains the significance of dysphagia and inadequate oral intake as key indicators for starting tube feeding. It also covers other medical conditions that necessitate this nutritional support and contrasts enteral with parenteral nutrition.

Key Points

  • Primary Indicators: Dysphagia (impaired swallowing) and inadequate oral intake are the two main indicators for initiating enteral nutrition.

  • Dysphagia Causes: Difficulty swallowing can arise from neurological disorders like strokes or Parkinson's, head/neck cancers, and altered mental status.

  • Inadequate Oral Intake Reasons: This is common in patients with prolonged anorexia, critical illness, on mechanical ventilation, or with specific GI disorders.

  • EN vs. PN: Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition because it is safer, more cost-effective, and preserves gut function.

  • Confirmation: Tube placement must be confirmed, often by X-ray, to prevent life-threatening complications like aspiration pneumonia.

  • Multidisciplinary Approach: A team including doctors, nurses, and dietitians assesses the patient's nutritional status and determines the appropriate feeding plan.

  • Monitoring is Crucial: Ongoing monitoring is required to check for tube displacement, feeding intolerance (vomiting, diarrhea), and skin integrity at the insertion site.

In This Article

Dysphagia (Impaired Swallowing)

One of the most common and definitive indicators for starting enteral nutrition is dysphagia, or difficulty swallowing. This condition can prevent a person from safely consuming enough food and fluids to meet their body's nutritional needs, putting them at high risk for malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia. Aspiration occurs when food or liquid accidentally enters the lungs, which can be life-threatening.

Dysphagia can result from a variety of medical issues, including neurological disorders (like stroke or Parkinson's), head and neck cancers, and altered mental status. For these patients, a feeding tube provides a direct and safe route to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Inadequate Oral Intake

The second major indicator for enteral nutrition is a patient's inability to maintain adequate oral intake. This means they cannot consume a sufficient amount of food or nutrients by mouth to meet their metabolic demands, despite having a functional GI tract. This can happen in various scenarios, and the need for nutritional support is identified through a comprehensive nutritional assessment.

Reasons for inadequate oral intake include prolonged anorexia, critical illnesses with increased nutritional requirements, mechanical ventilation, and certain gastrointestinal dysfunctions. In these cases, enteral feeding ensures the patient receives the necessary nutrients to prevent malnutrition, aid in recovery, and support immune function.

Other Relevant Indicators for Enteral Nutrition

Beyond the two primary indicators, several other clinical factors can lead to the initiation of enteral nutrition, including high-output fistulas, liver failure, and pancreatitis. A thorough assessment by a multidisciplinary team is essential.

Enteral vs. Parenteral Nutrition: A Comparison

The decision to use enteral nutrition is often contrasted with parenteral nutrition (PN), which involves delivering nutrients intravenously, bypassing the GI tract entirely. The table below highlights the key differences and why EN is generally preferred when possible.

Feature Enteral Nutrition (EN) Parenteral Nutrition (PN)
Route Uses the gastrointestinal tract, via a feeding tube. Bypasses the GI tract, delivering nutrients directly into a vein.
Physiology More natural and physiological, maintaining gut integrity. Less physiological, bypassing the digestive system.
Cost Generally less expensive. More costly.
Infection Risk Lower risk of systemic infection. Higher risk of infection.
Complications Can include aspiration, diarrhea, and tube issues. Includes metabolic complications, liver dysfunction, and catheter issues.

Conclusion

When a patient's nutritional status is compromised but their GI tract is functional, healthcare providers primarily look for dysphagia and inadequate oral intake as key indicators for initiating enteral nutrition. These conditions signify an inability to safely swallow or consume enough nutrients orally. While other factors exist, dysphagia and insufficient oral consumption are the most direct clinical signals for tube feeding to prevent malnutrition and promote recovery. EN is prioritized over PN due to being more physiological, cost-effective, and having a lower risk of complications.


Further reading:

For more detailed information on the indications and techniques of enteral feeding, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) provides extensive clinical overviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

Dysphagia is the medical term for difficulty swallowing. It indicates a need for enteral nutrition because it prevents a person from safely consuming enough food and liquids by mouth, increasing the risk of malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia, where food or fluid enters the lungs.

Providers conduct a nutritional assessment to determine if a patient's oral intake is sufficient to meet their metabolic needs. Indicators include significant unintentional weight loss, prolonged anorexia, and conditions that prevent safe eating, like mechanical ventilation or altered mental status.

Besides dysphagia and inadequate intake, conditions frequently necessitating enteral nutrition include strokes, head and neck cancers, critical illnesses such as severe burns, and certain gastrointestinal disorders like Crohn's disease.

No. Enteral nutrition uses a feeding tube to deliver nutrients into the gastrointestinal tract. Parenteral nutrition bypasses the GI tract entirely, delivering nutrients intravenously. EN is generally preferred when the GI tract is functional.

If a feeding tube is misplaced (e.g., into the lungs instead of the stomach), administering feedings or medications can cause life-threatening aspiration pneumonia. Proper placement is verified immediately after insertion, typically with an X-ray.

Common complications include gastrointestinal intolerance (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), tube-related issues (clogging, dislodgement), and aspiration. Metabolic complications like refeeding syndrome can also occur.

The duration of enteral nutrition varies. It can be short-term for conditions that resolve quickly, such as after a temporary illness or injury. For chronic conditions like neurological disorders, it may be a long-term solution.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.