Skip to content

Which vitamin did Casimir Funk discover in 1912?

3 min read

In 1912, Polish biochemist Casimir Funk coined the term 'vitamine' after recognizing that certain diseases, like beriberi and scurvy, were caused by specific nutrient deficiencies rather than infections. His groundbreaking theory, detailed in his 1912 publication, revolutionized nutritional science, even though he did not successfully isolate a specific vitamin that year.

Quick Summary

Casimir Funk coined the term 'vitamine' in 1912 to describe essential nutrients preventing deficiency diseases. His work laid the groundwork for modern nutrition, though he incorrectly isolated a substance that year.

Key Points

  • Coined the Term 'Vitamine': In 1912, Casimir Funk introduced the term 'vitamine' to describe the essential nutrients needed to prevent deficiency diseases like beriberi and scurvy.

  • Formulated the Concept: His major discovery was formulating the concept of vitamins, not isolating a specific one in 1912.

  • Mistaken Isolation: The substance Funk isolated in his search for the anti-beriberi factor was later identified as niacin (B3), not the true factor, which was thiamine (B1).

  • Suzuki's Prior Work: Unbeknownst to Funk, Japanese scientist Umetaro Suzuki had already isolated thiamine (B1) in 1910, but his discovery went largely unnoticed internationally.

  • Led to Further Discoveries: Funk's revolutionary hypothesis spurred intensive research that ultimately led to the discovery of all 13 known vitamins.

  • Shortened Name: The name was shortened from 'vitamine' to 'vitamin' after it was realized that not all of these essential compounds were amines.

  • Father of Vitamin Therapy: Despite the nuances, Funk is widely celebrated as the "father of vitamin therapy" and a pioneer of modern nutrition.

In This Article

The Groundbreaking Concept of 'Vitamines'

In the early 20th century, the medical community wrestled with the mystery of deficiency diseases such as beriberi, scurvy, and pellagra. It was widely believed that infections or toxins were the cause. However, Polish biochemist Casimir Funk challenged this prevailing belief. After studying the work of Dutch physician Christiaan Eijkman, who observed that chickens fed polished rice developed beriberi-like symptoms while those on brown rice remained healthy, Funk began his crucial research. He theorized that certain diseases were not caused by a toxic substance but rather by the absence of a vital component in the diet.

Funk's 1912 Isolation and the Coining of a New Term

In 1912, while working at the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine in London, Funk attempted to isolate the 'anti-beriberi factor' from rice husks. He succeeded in extracting a substance and, believing it to be an amine (a class of nitrogen-containing organic compounds), combined 'vital' and 'amine' to coin the term 'vitamine'. This groundbreaking hypothesis was formally published in a 1912 paper titled "The etiology of the deficiency diseases". Funk proposed that deficiencies in these essential substances could explain a range of illnesses, suggesting the existence of several 'vitamines' to prevent beriberi, scurvy, pellagra, and rickets.

The Misidentification of the Anti-Beriberi Factor

Here lies the nuance of Funk's 1912 discovery. The substance he isolated as the 'anti-beriberi factor' was not actually thiamine (vitamin B1), the true anti-beriberi nutrient. It was later identified as nicotinic acid, or niacin (vitamin B3), which does not prevent beriberi. Furthermore, Japanese biochemist Umetaro Suzuki had already isolated thiamine from rice bran in 1910, but his discovery failed to gain international recognition due to its publication in a Japanese journal and an inaccurate German translation. Funk's broader concept, however, proved a catalyst for future research.

Refining the Name and Expanding the Field

In the years following Funk's publication, it became clear that not all 'vitamines' contained an amine group. This led Jack Cecil Drummond to propose dropping the final 'e' in 1920, resulting in the word we use today: 'vitamin'. Funk's initial work sparked a global hunt for these essential micronutrients, leading to the discovery of thirteen vitamins by 1948. His legacy as the "father of vitamins" is secure not for the isolation of a specific vitamin in 1912, but for his visionary theoretical framework that fundamentally changed how medicine and nutritional science understood and approached dietary diseases.

Other Contributions by Casimir Funk

Beyond his work on vitamins, Funk was a prolific scientist who conducted research in several other fields. His contributions include:

  • Hormones: He researched the roles of animal hormones, including those from the pituitary and sex glands.
  • Cancer Biochemistry: Funk spent his later years studying the causes of neoplasms.
  • Diabetes and Peptic Ulcers: He also conducted research into these common diseases.
  • Drug Manufacturing: Funk devised improved manufacturing methods for many commercial drugs, including producing the first widely accepted vitamin concentrate in the U.S..

Comparison: Funk's 1912 Hypothesis vs. Modern Understanding

Aspect Funk's Hypothesis (1912) Modern Scientific Consensus
Core Concept Essential organic substances ('vitamines') prevent specific deficiency diseases, like beriberi. Essential organic micronutrients (vitamins) are required for proper physiological function and prevent a range of deficiency disorders.
Chemical Nature All 'vitamines' are thought to contain a nitrogenous 'amine' group. Not all vitamins contain amine groups; the term was shortened after this was discovered.
Anti-Beriberi Factor Believed to have isolated the true anti-beriberi factor from rice husks. The isolated substance was actually niacin (B3), not thiamine (B1), the real anti-beriberi factor.
Scope of Discovery Postulated the existence of multiple vitamines for various diseases (beriberi, scurvy, pellagra, rickets). Laid the groundwork that led to the discovery of 13 different vitamins over the following decades.

Conclusion

Casimir Funk's contribution in 1912 was not the discovery of a single vitamin, but rather the revolutionary idea that a lack of specific nutrients could cause disease. By coining the term 'vitamine' and proposing the link between diet and illness, he reshaped the field of medicine and nutrition, becoming known as the "father of vitamin therapy". His initial misidentification of the anti-beriberi factor does not detract from the significance of his work, which fundamentally shifted scientific focus toward the importance of micronutrients for human health. His legacy continues to influence nutritional science today.

Visit the Nobel Prize website for more on the discovery of vitamins

Frequently Asked Questions

Casimir Funk did not successfully isolate a specific vitamin in 1912. His major contribution was coining the term 'vitamine' and proposing the concept that a lack of essential nutrients caused deficiency diseases.

In his search for the anti-beriberi factor from rice husks, Funk isolated a substance that was later identified as niacin (vitamin B3), not thiamine (vitamin B1), which is the actual cure for beriberi.

Japanese biochemist Umetaro Suzuki isolated thiamine (vitamin B1) from rice bran in 1910, two years before Funk's publication. However, his discovery did not gain widespread recognition at the time.

The 'e' was dropped from 'vitamine' in 1920 after scientists realized that not all of the newly discovered vitamins contained a nitrogenous amine group, making the term technically inaccurate.

Based on his research, Funk proposed that the lack of specific 'vitamines' could cause beriberi, scurvy, pellagra, and rickets.

Funk is regarded as the father of vitamin therapy because he was the first to propose the theoretical framework for vitamins and link dietary deficiencies to specific diseases, paving the way for future nutritional discoveries.

In addition to his vitamin research, Funk also studied animal hormones, diabetes, peptic ulcers, and the biochemistry of cancer.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.