Skip to content

Why Is There No B11? The Evolution of Nutritional Science

2 min read

Over time, several substances once classified as B vitamins have been reclassified as non-vitamins. This is the scientific reason why there is no B11 or other missing B vitamins found in supplements today.

Quick Summary

B vitamins like B11 were once thought to be essential nutrients but were later reclassified as non-vitamins. The discovery that these compounds could be synthesized by the body or were not truly essential led to their removal from the official vitamin list, reflecting the progressive nature of nutritional science.

Key Points

  • Reclassification of Non-Essential Nutrients: Substances initially labeled as vitamins, like B11, were reclassified when they were found to be non-essential or synthesizable by the body.

  • What B11 Was: The name 'Vitamin B11' was historically associated with both pteroyl-hepta-glutamic acid (a form of folate/B9) and salicylic acid.

  • Evolution of Scientific Understanding: The gaps in the B vitamin numbering (B4, B8, B10, B11) reflect the progression of scientific knowledge in the field of nutrition.

  • Defining a True Vitamin: A substance is a true vitamin only if it is essential for human health and cannot be sufficiently produced by the body, necessitating dietary intake.

  • Focus on Eight Core B Vitamins: The nutritional focus is now on the eight definitively recognized B vitamins: B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, and B12.

  • Avoiding Dangerous 'Vitamins': The case of 'vitamin' B17 (laetrile), which releases cyanide, highlights the importance of relying on established scientific classifications.

In This Article

The Scientific Definition of a Vitamin

The absence of certain B vitamins, including B11, stems from the strict scientific criteria for vitamin classification. A substance must be an essential organic compound that an organism cannot produce sufficiently and must obtain from external sources. A deficiency must also cause specific symptoms. The B complex originally grouped water-soluble compounds found together, but research clarified which were truly essential.

The Discovery and Reclassification of Vitamin B11

Early research identified substances like chick growth factor or pteroyl-hepta-glutamic acid, mistakenly labeled vitamin B11. Further study showed this was a form of folic acid (vitamin B9) and not a unique vitamin. Salicylic acid was also sometimes called B11 but was excluded because the human body can synthesize it, meaning it didn't meet the essentiality criteria for a vitamin. This reclassification left a gap in the numbering.

A Look at Other 'Lost' B Vitamins

Numbers are missing from the B vitamin list because substances initially considered vitamins were later reclassified. Examples include B4 (Adenine/Choline), B8 (Inositol), B10 (PABA), B15 (Pangamic Acid), and B17 (Amygdalin). For a detailed look at why these were declassified and the true B vitamin complex, see {Link: wikidoc https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/B_vitamins}.

Comparison Table: Genuine vs. 'Lost' Vitamins

Feature Genuine Vitamin B9 (Folate) 'Lost' Vitamin B11 (Pteroyl-hepta-glutamic Acid/Salicylic Acid)
Essentiality Essential for human health; deficiency causes megaloblastic anemia and birth defects. Not essential from diet; either a form of B9 or synthesizable by the body.
Source Found in leafy greens, beans, fortified foods. Pteroyl-hepta-glutamic acid is a form of folate; salicylic acid is body-synthesized.
Function Critical for DNA replication and cell division. Functions related to B9 or other roles not requiring vitamin status.
Classification Recognized as one of the eight B vitamins. De-classified from vitamin status.
Supplementation Included in B-complex supplements and fortified foods. Not included in legitimate vitamin supplements.

Conclusion: The Evolving Science of Nutrition

The absence of B11 reflects the dynamic nature of nutritional science. Substances initially thought to be unique vitamins were reclassified when better understood, either as forms of existing vitamins or non-essential compounds. This ensures our understanding is based on accurate evidence, focusing on the eight proven essential B vitamins.

Frequently Asked Questions

The vitamins with missing numbers, such as B4, B8, B10, and B11, were reclassified as non-vitamins. This occurred after scientists discovered that these compounds were either not truly essential for humans or could be produced by the body, which disqualifies them from the official vitamin definition.

No, B11 was never officially a real vitamin. The number was mistakenly assigned to substances that were later either reidentified (like a form of folate) or found to be non-essential (like salicylic acid).

The label B11 was given to several substances, including pteroyl-hepta-glutamic acid (later found to be a form of vitamin B9) and salicylic acid. Salicylic acid was removed from the list because the body can synthesize it.

Accurate classification is vital for ensuring public health and safety. It helps medical professionals and nutritionists provide sound advice, prevents the promotion of unproven and potentially dangerous substances (like B17), and ensures that official guidelines focus on truly essential nutrients.

B4 (Adenine/Choline) and B8 (Inositol) were also declassified. Adenine is produced by the body, and while choline is an essential nutrient, the body can produce some of it. Inositol can be synthesized from glucose.

It is unlikely that new B vitamins will be discovered and added to the numbered list. The current eight-vitamin classification is based on extensive scientific research and is considered stable. However, nutritional science is always evolving, leading to deeper understanding of existing nutrients.

No, you should not be concerned. Since B11 was never a true, essential vitamin, there is no nutritional requirement for it. Focusing on a balanced diet rich in the eight scientifically recognized B vitamins is the most effective way to maintain good health.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.