Skip to content

Are ALOHA protein bars better than GoMacro bars? A Head-to-Head Comparison

5 min read

The global protein bar market is projected to reach $26.33 billion by 2034, fueled by a growing demand for convenient and healthy snacks. In this booming market, two prominent plant-based contenders often battle for attention: ALOHA and GoMacro. But when it comes down to it, are ALOHA protein bars better than GoMacro bars?

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of ALOHA and GoMacro protein bars, examining nutritional content, ingredient sourcing, certifications, taste, and cost.

Key Points

  • Higher Protein and Fiber: ALOHA bars contain more protein (14g vs. 10-12g) and significantly more fiber (up to 10g vs. 2-3g) per bar compared to GoMacro.

  • Lower Sugar Content: ALOHA bars have substantially less sugar (around 5g) than GoMacro bars (around 14g), making them more suitable for low-sugar diets.

  • Low-FODMAP Option: GoMacro offers certified low-FODMAP options, a key benefit for individuals with digestive sensitivities.

  • Taste and Texture are Subjective: Both brands offer a chewy, non-chalky texture and a wide variety of flavors, but personal preference dictates which tastes 'better'.

  • Certifications Vary: Both are USDA Organic, Vegan, and Non-GMO, but ALOHA is also a Certified B-Corporation, while GoMacro features low-FODMAP options.

  • Better for 'Macro-Conscious': Due to the higher protein-to-sugar ratio, ALOHA is often considered a better choice for those closely monitoring their macros.

In This Article

Nutritional Breakdown: Protein, Sugar, and Fiber

When choosing a protein bar, the nutritional profile is paramount. While both ALOHA and GoMacro offer clean, plant-based ingredients, their macronutrient ratios have some key differences. Comparing a standard-sized bar from both brands shows a clear distinction, especially in sugar and fiber content.

Protein Content

Both brands provide a significant dose of protein from vegan sources like organic brown rice and organic pea protein. However, ALOHA bars typically contain more. For example, a standard ALOHA bar offers 14 grams of protein, while many GoMacro MacroBars contain 10-12 grams. For those prioritizing muscle recovery or higher protein intake, ALOHA may have the edge.

Sugar and Fiber

This is where the most significant nutritional difference lies. ALOHA bars are formulated to be lower in sugar and higher in fiber. An average ALOHA bar contains around 5 grams of sugar and a substantial 10 grams of fiber, derived from organic tapioca fiber. In contrast, many popular GoMacro MacroBars have higher sugar content, often around 14 grams, and considerably less fiber, typically around 2-3 grams. For individuals mindful of sugar intake or seeking digestive support from dietary fiber, ALOHA's profile is more favorable. The lower sugar content in ALOHA bars may help prevent blood sugar spikes and crashes.

Ingredients, Sourcing, and Certifications

Both companies pride themselves on using high-quality, plant-based ingredients, but a closer look at their sourcing and certifications reveals some variations.

Ingredient Quality and Sourcing

Both ALOHA and GoMacro use organic, whole-food ingredients and avoid artificial sweeteners and flavors. A notable difference is the sweetener used: GoMacro frequently uses organic brown rice syrup, a source of sugars, while ALOHA focuses on organic cane sugar and monk fruit to achieve lower sugar levels. Both use nut and seed butters, but GoMacro has a line of nut-free options, making it more accommodating for those with nut allergies.

Certifications and Ethical Standing

Both brands have impressive certifications, including USDA Organic, Vegan, Gluten-Free, and Non-GMO Project Verified, ensuring clean, high-quality, and ethically sourced ingredients. However, ALOHA holds an additional distinction as a Certified B-Corporation. This certification signifies a commitment to higher standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency. While GoMacro is carbon neutral and gives back to community organizations, the B-Corp status is a specific, third-party verified measure of corporate social responsibility that ALOHA possesses. Additionally, GoMacro offers certified low-FODMAP bars, a key feature for those with sensitive stomachs or specific digestive needs.

Taste, Texture, and Cost

Taste and texture are subjective, but general consumer feedback offers some insight into the sensory experience of each bar.

Texture and Taste

Both bars are praised for having a chewy, soft texture that avoids the chalky, dry feel of some other protein bars. ALOHA bars are often described as tasting like a dessert, with a soft-baked cookie or brownie-like consistency. GoMacro bars are described similarly as having a dense and chewy, almost fudgy texture. Individual flavor preferences will dictate which brand a consumer prefers. Both offer a wide array of flavor options, though GoMacro has a slightly wider selection.

Cost

Both are considered premium, with prices reflecting their use of high-quality organic ingredients. While the exact cost per bar can vary widely based on retailer and purchase volume, they tend to be in a similar price range, with GoMacro sometimes slightly more expensive on a per-bar basis for standard sizes.

Comparison Table

Feature ALOHA Protein Bars GoMacro MacroBars
Protein per bar ~14g ~10-12g
Sugar per bar ~4-5g ~11-15g
Fiber per bar ~6-10g ~2-3g
Protein Source Organic brown rice & pumpkin seed Organic brown rice & pea protein
Main Sweetener Organic cane sugar, tapioca syrup, monk fruit Organic brown rice syrup
Taste/Texture Often described as tasting like dessert, soft and chewy Dense and chewy, reminiscent of homemade baked goods
Certifications Certified B-Corp, USDA Organic, Vegan, Non-GMO Low-FODMAP options, USDA Organic, Vegan, Non-GMO
Nut-Free Options No Yes
Cost Premium pricing Premium pricing (potentially slightly higher)

Making the Best Choice for Your Needs

Ultimately, the better protein bar depends on your individual priorities. Both brands are excellent, whole-food-based vegan options, but their nutritional differences cater to different needs. For the macro-conscious consumer, the choice is more straightforward.

Here’s a simplified breakdown:

  • Choose ALOHA if: Your primary goal is to consume a bar that is lower in sugar and higher in fiber while still delivering a solid amount of protein. The Certified B-Corp status may also appeal if you prioritize a company’s social and environmental impact.
  • Choose GoMacro if: You prefer a wider variety of flavors or require a low-FODMAP certified bar due to digestive sensitivities. The higher sugar content might also be beneficial for endurance athletes needing more readily available carbohydrates.

Many consumers also appreciate the nut-free options offered by GoMacro, which is a key differentiator for those with nut allergies. The recent class-action lawsuit against GoMacro regarding their "healthy" claims and high sugar content is also a consideration for some, though it's important to recognize that the nutritional profile is transparently listed. For those seeking an all-around favorable nutritional profile of higher fiber and lower sugar in a tasty, clean package, ALOHA generally comes out on top. However, personal preference for taste, texture, and specific dietary needs like FODMAP restrictions may lead you to prefer GoMacro. As with any dietary choice, reading the label and considering your specific health goals is the best approach. For more information on selecting protein bars, consider resources from authoritative health sites.

Conclusion: Are ALOHA protein bars better than GoMacro bars?

While both ALOHA and GoMacro offer high-quality, plant-based protein bars, ALOHA generally provides a more advantageous nutritional profile for many health-conscious consumers. ALOHA bars consistently deliver a higher protein-to-sugar ratio, significantly more dietary fiber, and fewer calories per bar than their GoMacro counterparts. These factors make ALOHA a more suitable choice for individuals focused on lower sugar intake and increased satiety. However, GoMacro holds a niche advantage with certified low-FODMAP options and a broader flavor selection, appealing to those with specific digestive needs or a broader palate. The final verdict depends on individual dietary goals and taste preferences; for a superior macronutrient balance in a clean, organic bar, ALOHA is often the better choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

ALOHA protein bars generally have significantly less sugar, with around 4-5 grams per bar, compared to GoMacro bars which can contain 11-15 grams of sugar.

For general digestive health, ALOHA bars contain a higher amount of fiber (up to 10g), which aids in digestion. For individuals with specific sensitivities, GoMacro offers several certified low-FODMAP options.

Yes, both ALOHA and GoMacro are certified vegan, plant-based protein bars made without any animal products or byproducts.

ALOHA bars typically contain more protein, offering around 14 grams per bar, whereas GoMacro bars usually provide 10-12 grams of protein.

Both brands offer a wide range of popular flavors like peanut butter and chocolate. Taste is subjective, but ALOHA is often praised for a dessert-like quality, while GoMacro has a slightly wider variety of options.

Several varieties of GoMacro MacroBars, including all mini bars and some full-sized bars, are certified low-FODMAP. This is a key feature that ALOHA does not offer.

ALOHA is a Certified B-Corporation, which means it has been verified to meet high standards of social and environmental performance. GoMacro is also sustainably focused and produces its bars using 100% renewable energy.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.