Skip to content

Are Cheez-Its or Goldfish Crackers Healthier? A Nutritional Showdown

4 min read

According to nutritional data, Goldfish crackers contain slightly less fat per serving than original Cheez-Its, but overall differences are marginal. While both are popular choices, comparing their ingredients and processing is essential to determine if Cheez-Its or Goldfish are healthier for your family.

Quick Summary

This nutritional breakdown analyzes the ingredients, processing, and calorie count of Goldfish and Cheez-Its to help you make an informed decision on your next cheesy snack purchase.

Key Points

  • Nutritional Similarities: The calories, fat, and protein content per serving of Cheez-Its and Goldfish are very similar, making overall nutritional differences marginal.

  • Slight Fat Difference: Goldfish generally have slightly less fat per serving compared to original Cheez-Its, giving them a minor calorie advantage.

  • Additives and Preservatives: Goldfish often avoid artificial colors, but Cheez-Its contain the controversial preservative TBHQ, which has been linked to potential immune system issues.

  • Whole-Grain Advantage: Certain Goldfish varieties made with whole grains provide a slightly more nutritious alternative than the standard enriched flour versions of both brands.

  • Ultra-Processed Classification: Both snack crackers are considered ultra-processed foods, and health organizations advise against frequent consumption.

  • Moderation is Key: Neither snack is truly 'healthy,' and they should be enjoyed in moderation as part of a balanced diet that emphasizes whole foods.

In This Article

A Tale of Two Crackers: A Brief History

Cheez-Its, first introduced in 1921 by the Green & Green Company, have long been a pantry staple known for their distinct square shape and intense cheese flavor. Today, the brand is owned by Kellogg's and continues to offer a variety of flavors beyond the classic original. Goldfish crackers, introduced by Pepperidge Farm in 1958, are famous for their fun, fish-shaped design and milder taste. Baked, not fried, Goldfish have often been marketed with a family-friendly image, with options like whole-grain varieties expanding their appeal.

Nutritional Breakdown: Cheez-Its vs. Goldfish

To get to the heart of the matter, we must compare the standard versions of each cracker side-by-side. For this analysis, we will use approximate nutritional values based on a standard 30g or 1-ounce serving size, though exact values may vary slightly by product line and region.

Nutritional Aspect Cheez-Its (Original) Goldfish (Cheddar)
Calories ~150 kcal ~140 kcal
Total Fat ~8g ~5-6g
Saturated Fat ~1-1.5g ~1-1.5g
Sodium ~210-230mg ~240-250mg
Total Carbohydrates ~16-17g ~19-20g
Dietary Fiber <1g ~1g
Protein ~3g ~3g

What the Numbers Tell Us

From a pure macronutrient standpoint, the differences between the original versions are minimal. Goldfish have a slight edge with fewer calories and less fat per serving. However, Cheez-Its often contain slightly less sodium. It is important to remember that these are both processed, refined flour snacks that lack significant fiber and protein, making them less filling and nutritionally dense than whole-food alternatives.

Deeper Dive: Ingredients and Processing

Looking beyond the basic nutrition label, the specific ingredients and processing methods offer a clearer picture of potential health implications.

Ingredients: Where the Differences Lie

  • Enriched Flour: Both crackers begin with enriched wheat flour, which is a refined carbohydrate source. While enriched with some vitamins, it is not a whole grain and lacks the fiber and nutrients of its unprocessed counterpart. Some Goldfish varieties, like the Whole Grain Cheddar, do include whole wheat flour, which is a more nutritious option.
  • Vegetable Oils: Both snacks use a blend of vegetable oils like canola, soybean, and sunflower oil. While a source of fat, some consumers express concerns over the use of refined oils, which are often highly processed.
  • Cheese: Both brands proudly advertise being made with real cheese. However, the cheese in processed snacks is often heavily processed itself, and some ingredients like annatto extract are used to enhance color.
  • Additives and Preservatives: This is a key area of divergence. Goldfish crackers do not contain artificial colors in many varieties, instead using plant-based extracts like paprika and turmeric. Cheez-Its, on the other hand, contain the preservative tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ). Research from the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has raised concerns about TBHQ potentially harming the immune system and increasing the risk of allergies.

Processing Concerns

EWG classifies both products as “unhealthy ultra-processed foods,” linking consumption to a higher risk of health problems such as heart disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. The intense processing and addition of flavor enhancers like autolyzed yeast extract (in Goldfish) and monosodium glutamate (in some Cheez-It varieties) contribute to the addictive nature of these snacks.

Which is the "Healthier" Choice?

Based on a detailed comparison, neither Cheez-Its nor Goldfish can be considered truly 'healthy' in the way that whole foods are. However, a distinction can be made when evaluating the nuances of their ingredients. Goldfish crackers, particularly the whole-grain varieties and those without artificial colors, present a slightly better option for those aiming to minimize processed ingredients. The presence of the potentially concerning preservative TBHQ in Cheez-Its is a significant point of concern for some consumers. For a more balanced, less-processed snack, consider alternatives like Simple Mills cheddar crackers.

The Moderation Message

Ultimately, for most people, the occasional enjoyment of either snack is not a major dietary concern, as long as it's part of a balanced diet rich in whole foods. As mentioned in a comparative analysis by Nutrition Hungry, the nutritional differences are not significant enough to declare one definitively superior to the other for general consumption. The choice may come down to taste, price, and personal comfort with certain ingredients.

Conclusion

While both Cheez-Its and Goldfish crackers are ultra-processed snacks with comparable macronutrient profiles, a deeper look reveals subtle differences. The absence of controversial additives like TBHQ in many Goldfish varieties and the availability of a whole-grain option give them a slight edge in the health department. The best decision for your diet depends on your personal priorities regarding ingredients and processing. For the average consumer, enjoying either snack in moderation as part of a varied diet is the most sensible approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

Standard cheddar Goldfish typically contain slightly fewer calories per serving than original Cheez-Its, though the difference is very small.

In their standard versions, Goldfish crackers usually have slightly more sodium per serving than original Cheez-Its.

Whole-grain Goldfish are a marginally healthier option because they contain a higher percentage of whole wheat flour, providing slightly more fiber than the enriched flour versions.

Some consumers are concerned about Cheez-Its due to the presence of the preservative TBHQ, which the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has raised concerns about regarding its potential effects on immune health.

No, most Goldfish varieties use colors sourced from plants, such as paprika and turmeric extracts, instead of artificial food dyes.

Yes, as with most processed foods, Cheez-Its and Goldfish can be enjoyed in moderation as an occasional snack within a balanced diet. However, they should not be a dietary staple.

Healthier alternatives include whole-food snacks like fruit, vegetables with dip, nuts, seeds, or minimally processed crackers such as Simple Mills cheddar crackers.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.